And Then The Democrats Wonder Why Republicans Want Voter ID Laws...

[Sidewinder]

http://www2.wsls.com/news/2012/jun/1...io-ar-1996759/

"When Tim Morris got his mail last week he found a pretty big surprise, a document asking his dog Mozart to register to vote.

"Not only is Mozart a dog but he's been dead for two years."

"(T)he voter registration forms were sent by the non-profit Voter Participation Center, not the State Board of Elections."

"(T)hey purchase mailing lists from vendors and while they do try and check every name the organization admits that some do fall through the cracks."

[Iaintliein]

They don't "wonder" at all, they rely on voter fraud for power, always have, and will always deny it.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Iaintliein

They don't "wonder" at all, they rely on voter fraud for power, always have, and will always deny it.

Jim 'Pinocchio' Crow, your nose is growing...

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Sidewinder

http://www2.wsls.com/news/2012/jun/1...io-ar-1996759/

"When Tim Morris got his mail last week he found a pretty big surprise, a document asking his dog Mozart to register to vote.

"Not only is Mozart a dog but he's been dead for two years."

"(T)he voter registration forms were sent by the non-profit Voter Participation Center, not the State Board of Elections."

"(T)hey purchase mailing lists from vendors and while they do try and check every name the organization admits that some do fall through the cracks."

Did the dog actually vote?

[Sidewinder]

The owner did not register the (dead) dog to vote, so the (dead) dog didn't vote. From this, one infers that the owner was not a doggedly loyal Democrat.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Sidewinder

The owner did not register the (dead) dog to vote, so the (dead) dog didn't vote. From this, one infers that the owner was not a doggedly loyal Democrat.

I think it infers that the GOP is trying to get their Jim Crow on.

[Iaintliein]

I wonder if he was a "blue dog" or a "yellow dog".

[mastermind238]

Originally Posted by WTF

I think it infers that the GOP is trying to get their Jim Crow on.

This Jim Crow bullshit from the lefties is getting old. Find some new material. Even a leftie like US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens agrees that requiring voter ID is not only CONSTITUTIONAL, but is a small price to pay to ensure the integrity of the vote.

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by mastermind238

This Jim Crow bullshit from the lefties is getting old. Find some new material. Even a leftie like US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens agrees that requiring voter ID is not only CONSTITUTIONAL, but is a small price to pay to ensure the integrity of the vote.

The requirement for photo ID is obviously common sense. Photo ID's are reqired for just about anything, even slightly important, and everyone knows it. If you are lucky enough to get a meeting with a congressman to express your support for photo ID, you're going to have to show a photo ID to get to see him. If we are not going to require photo ID, we might as well just get rid of the requirement for voter registration. Why even continue this charade that the process has any integrity.

The Dimo's opposition to photo ID is clearly an attempt to allow their continued practice of voter fraud. There is no other reason for it.

[mastermind238]

Originally Posted by WTF

Did the dog actually vote?

No, but without the requirement for a photo ID, a human being PRETENDING to be the dog could very easily have voted. And gotten away with it.

Why take any measures at all to ensure the integrity of the system? Every place, even Wisconsin, requires registration. Isn't that an attempt to ensure integrity? Why even require that much - registration - if we can trust that ONLY qualified voters (US citizens over 18 who haven't had voting privilege stripped because of a felony conviction) will vote, and that every qualified voter will vote ONLY ONCE? We've NEVER had that level of trust.

And today, because of almost 20 years of Motor Voter and a concerted effort by lefties and the left-dominated DOJ to make sure illegal aliens can vote with impunity, any reasonable person paying the slightest bit of attention would have NO reason to trust the integrity of the vote.

In close races it matters. Texas might not be close in November. But plenty of other places will be. Why else do you think George Soros has been working so hard the past 5 years or so to get his people into state-level positions (mostly secretaries of state) that control the apparatus of elections?

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=5472

Read it and weep for our republic.

A quote (perhaps incorrectly) attributed to Joseph Stalin seems appropriate:

"It doesn't matter who votes. What matters is who counts the votes."

Educate yourself. Google "Secretary of State Project." All you need to know is that George Soros is behind it.

[Whirlaway]

The liberals get all bent out of shape about electronic voting (without a paper trail) but have big issues over requiring voters to show ID.

Go figure.

The conserviatives I know respect the integrity of the voting process and want a paper trail for both the ballot and the voter.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by mastermind238

No, but without the requirement for a photo ID, a human being PRETENDING to be the dog could very easily have voted. And gotten away with it.

.

A human being pretending to be a dog?

Listen to yourself.

What about cats? Are they able to vote yet?



If you really checked, you would find that there is very little voter fraud. You propose to kill a knat on your left hand with a hammer with your right hand, just because you hate your left hand, not because you want to really kill the knat.

[mastermind238]

Originally Posted by WTF

A human being pretending to be a dog?

Listen to yourself.

What about cats? Are they able to vote yet?



If you really checked, you would find that there is very little voter fraud. You propose to kill a knat on your left hand with a hammer with your right hand, just because you hate your left hand, not because you want to really kill the knat.

The word is GNAT, by the way.

And let me use simpler words, since you obviously can't make the logical connection yourself. A PERSON who returns a voter registration form with a DOG's name on it, not his OWN name, and receives a voter registration card can show up at a polling place and ask for a ballot in the "dog's" name. Now, I put "dog's" in quotes to signify that I don't actually mean that a dog would ask for a ballot. Get it? Now that you know without question that I didn't mean that the dog would actually vote, how about paying attention to the substance of my remarks?

You continue to say voter fraud doesn't exist. And I say IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. The Supreme Court has said requiring voter ID IS CONSTITUTIONAL AND A REASONABLE, NON-BURDENSOME THING TO DO TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE VOTE. I refer you once again to Justice John Paul Stevens.

Maybe if I shout you'll pay attention. But maybe not. You just keep playing that recording over and over in your head - "There's no voter fraud. There's no voter fraud ..." and refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of the argument in favor of voter ID laws. Even hardcore lefties like John Paul Stevens are able to listen to reason once in a while.

[Guest123018-4]

If I was president I would issue an executive order saying who could and could not vote.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by mastermind238

You continue to say voter fraud doesn't exist. .

You are a God Damn Liar.

I said there is very little.

Originally Posted by mastermind238

. The Supreme Court has said requiring voter ID IS CONSTITUTIONAL AND A REASONABLE, NON-BURDENSOME THING TO DO TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE VOTE. I refer you once again to Justice John Paul Stevens.

Maybe if I shout you'll pay attention. But maybe not. You just keep playing that recording over and over in your head - "There's no voter fraud. There's no voter fraud ..." and refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of the argument in favor of voter ID laws. Even hardcore lefties like John Paul Stevens are able to listen to reason once in a while.

Now quit lying in regards to what I said and I may continue to educate you in real politics.

The counter argument is that do you want to over regulate voter ID laws?

Some times you righties hate regulation and at other you seem to embrace it! Do you want to disenfranchise x number of voters because you may have y number of fraud? Especially if y close to zero.

Should we pass a law where you need to show an ID to buy food?