Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 400
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70822
biomed163693
Yssup Rider61265
gman4453360
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48819
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37409
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-14-2020, 05:36 AM   #1
bb1961
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 7,114
Default This two-faced bitch Tameka Hart has got some 'splainin' to do!!

This shit on the left has got so low down and dirty and corrupt that the left has turned into a complete cesspool of miscreants. Again I have to cite a credible source BECAUSE THE LSM DOESN'T DEEM THE NEWS WORTHY!!


Political Bias of Lead Stone Juror EXPOSED, Nets Respond With Blackout
By Nicholas Fondacaro | February 13, 2020 9:43 PM EST Tameka Hart, the forewoman in the federal trial against Roger Stone, was exposed on Wednesday by Daily Caller investigative reporter Chuck Ross for once being a Democratic candidate for Congress, on top of being a staunch anti-Trump opponent. While the story continued to spread online, the liberal broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) tried to hide the revelation from their viewers.
On Thursday, the networks continued to insist (via obsession) that the only controversy with the case was Attorney General William Barr requesting a shorter incarceration period than what prosecutors were demanding.
A simple review of Hart’s Twitter account proves how politically motivated she was by far-left politics. In October of last year, she took President Trump’s strong condemnation of Turkey’s dictator and suggested our President was the real “devil.” And other deep dives of her social media history show much of the same.
Meanwhile, during the Thursday edition of Fox News Channel’s Special Report, chief White House correspondent John Roberts was helping viewers understand the Hart controversy:
But a new revelation in all of this, when the jury forewoman from the Stone trial came forward to support the four prosecutors who resigned after the recommendation was scrapped.
Tameka Hart posting on Facebook, “It pains me to see the DOJ now interfere with the hard work of the prosecutors. They acted with the utmost intelligence, integrity, and respect for our system of justice.” Hart, who works for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ran as a Democrat for Congress in 2012 and has posted tweets critical of President Trump.
Roberts also noted that “the President fired back” in a tweet that read: “Now it looks like the foreperson and the jury in the Roger Stone case had significant bias. Add that to everything else, and this is not looking good for the ‘Justice’ Department.”
But the only Trump tweets the networks were interested in were the ones they claimed, without evidence, showed that Trump was directing Barr to interfere with Stone’s sentencing.
“On Tuesday, Justice Department prosecutors recommended a seven to nine-year prison sentence for the President's close friend, Roger Stone,” reported ABC Justice correspondent Pierre Thomas on World News Tonight. “The President, furious, tweeting, ‘Cannot allow this miscarriage of justice!’ And just hours later, the Attorney General officially overruling his own prosecutors to recommend a lighter sentence.”
In an exclusive interview, Thomas pressed Barr: “Did you talk to the President at all about your decision regarding the recommendations?” The other networks all ran the soundbites.
Speaking of tweets about the Stone case, Ross actually uncovered an instance of Hart retweeting criticism of Trump’s outrage at how Stone was arrested.
The transcript is below, click "expand" to read:
Fox News Channel’s Special Report
February 13, 2020
6:02:58 p.m. Eastern
(…)
JOHN ROBERTS: But a new revelation in all of this, when the jury forewoman from the Stone trial came forward to support the four prosecutors who resigned after the recommendation was scrapped.
Tameka Hart posting on Facebook, “It pains me to see the DOJ now interfere with the hard work of the prosecutors. They acted with the utmost intelligence, integrity, and respect for our system of justice.” Hart, who works for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ran as a Democrat for Congress in 2012 and has posted tweets critical of President Trump.
The President fired back, “Now it looks like the foreperson and the jury in the Roger Stone case had significant bias. Add that to everything else, and this is not looking good for the ‘Justice’ Department.”
In a statement to Fox News, Stone's attorney Grant Smith says, “Mr. Stone and his defense team are diligently reviewing the newly reported information to determine any appropriate next steps.”
(…)
bb1961 is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 06:54 AM   #2
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Yeah, no conspiracy here.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 07:08 AM   #3
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

I think I recall mentioning the biggest danger stone, or any of the trump friends, might face from the hoax of the Russian collusion debacle, other than rabid "get them for anything we can dream up" partisan prosecutors, would be a hostile jury pool of democrat operatives in the northeast

much like trump faces with the deep state and those awful dim secret slime ball operatives in government

but I've heard the evidence was there against him.

his real fault was his desire or need to be relevant and seen as playing some part in reclaiming America, which isn't a bad thing .

but he was a minor hanger on.

too bad the dims and their operatives ran the frame up of trump that failed but it swept up a couple of minor actors who never would have been swept up or even called to testify about anything if it weren't for the frame-up

so in a way, stone was framed too
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 07:28 AM   #4
friendly fred
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 27, 2018
Location: Back in Texas!
Posts: 7,196
Encounters: 5
Default

Seems like an examination of all elements of the trial is needed here...
friendly fred is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 08:16 AM   #5
rexdutchman
Valued Poster
 
rexdutchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
Encounters: 22
Default

LSM ""'look the other way nothing to see " Idiots
rexdutchman is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 08:21 AM   #6
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default

My question is how the fuck did this woman get on the jury to begin with?
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 08:29 AM   #7
bambino
BANNED
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 43,221
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
My question is how the fuck did this woman get on the jury to begin with?
The judge picked her. They both should be disbarred. The Dems are good at lying to the courts.
bambino is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 08:29 AM   #8
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
My question is how the fuck did this woman get on the jury to begin with?
she got on the jury with surreptitious obfuscation while rubbing her hands with evil glee
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 08:54 AM   #9
HoeHummer
BANNED
 
HoeHummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 7, 2019
Location: North
Posts: 3,942
Default

Sounds like yous need to get your house in order, boys!

The conspiracies are thickers than evers , eh?

But at least state TV is keeping you informed! LOLLING!

ONE STAR!!!
HoeHummer is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 09:06 AM   #10
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default

At the very least, Stone will get a new trial.

Also, when a potential juror fills out the juror questionnaire, or are examined by the attorneys, they are supposed to admit to any prejudices. This jury Forman might find herself in hot water.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 09:13 AM   #11
HoeHummer
BANNED
 
HoeHummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 7, 2019
Location: North
Posts: 3,942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
At the very least, Stone will get a new trial.

Also, when a potential juror fills out the juror questionnaire, or are examined by the attorneys, they are supposed to admit to any prejudices. This jury Forman might find herself in hot water.
Is that how it works? Just saw that in your sham impeachment trial.

LOLLING!
HoeHummer is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 09:19 AM   #12
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought View Post
I think I recall mentioning the biggest danger stone, or any of the trump friends, might face from the hoax of the Russian collusion debacle, other than rabid "get them for anything we can dream up" partisan prosecutors, would be a hostile jury pool of democrat operatives in the northeast

much like trump faces with the deep state and those awful dim secret slime ball operatives in government

but I've heard the evidence was there against him.

his real fault was his desire or need to be relevant and seen as playing some part in reclaiming America, which isn't a bad thing .

but he was a minor league hanger on.

too bad the dims and their operatives ran the frame up of trump that failed but it swept up a couple of minor actors who never would have been swept up or even called to testify about anything if it weren't for the frame-up

so in a way, stone was framed too

ftfy
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 09:31 AM   #13
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Anybody remember when Flynn's judge Contreras recused himself mysteriously? He gave no reason. Then it turned out he was personal friends with piece of Strzok? How'd Contreras get chosen for that trial?

Yet, somehow Flynn isn't getting a new trial either.

Nothing to see here. Move along conspiracy theorists. Pay no attention to the creature behind the curtain.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 10:24 AM   #14
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoeHummer View Post
Is that how it works? Just saw that in your sham impeachment trial.

LOLLING!
I have no idea what this has to do with the subject matter.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 02-14-2020, 10:27 AM   #15
bambino
BANNED
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 43,221
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
I have no idea what this has to do with the subject matter.
He never posts anything relevant or intelligent.
bambino is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved