Brokaw to Mitchell: House Dems don’t really have “the goods” on Trump, do they?

[dilbert firestorm]

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morri...y-goods-trump/


former NBC anchor Tom Brokaw said this.

Brokaw, who covered the Watergate scandal as a White House correspondent in 1973, said Tuesday that Democrats don’t have “the goods” on Trump “with the same kind of clarity” the party did when Richard Nixon was president.

“The big difference is … they still don’t have what you call ‘the goods’ on this president in terms of breaking the law and being an impeachable target for them,” Brokaw said during an appearance on MSNBC.

“They’re going to start the process but they don’t have the same kind of clarity that the people who were opposed to Richard Nixon had because it was so clear that these were criminal acts that he was involved in,” he said.

when you have an anchor on the level of cronkite saying this, democrats lost the battle.

[HoeHummer]

Tom Brokaw=Walter Cronkite?

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Tom Brokaw=Walter Cronkite?

Ha! my thought as well.

who cares what semi-senile Brokaw thinks? we are having an investigation to find out if there are "goods" at a level that would impeach Trump. a real journalist wouldn't be speculating so early.

[gnadfly]

"early?" They've been investigating for THREE years!

You don't think the whistleblower and many of these latest people who've come to testify haven't been extensively pre-interviewed? Of course they have! The whole Lawfare team that the Dims have hired were first put together during the Mueller Investigation.

This has gone on long past the harassment stage.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Ha! my thought as well.

who cares what semi-senile Brokaw thinks? we are having an investigation to find out if there are "goods" at a level that would impeach Trump. a real journalist wouldn't be speculating so early.

Hey dumbass, Trump released the transcript. No quid pro quo. The rest is just unelected “officials” bloviating their opinions.

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

"early?" They've been investigating for THREE years!

nope.. the investigation began on or about September 26..

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/09/th...aint-timeline/

or were you changing the subject as usual?

[Unique_Carpenter]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

nope.. the investigation began on or about September 26..

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/09/th...aint-timeline/

or were you changing the subject as usual?

That would be the additional one cause all the others went zip. It's still continuous and ongoing harrassment.

What I'm waiting for is the Dims to start saying how to run the actual impeachment trial in the senate. That will be amusing.

[Hotrod511]

Originally Posted by bambino

Hey dumbass, Trump released the transcript. No quid pro quo. The rest is just unelected “officials” bloviating their opinions.

that what dumb-asses do "Bloviate"

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Ha! my thought as well.

who cares what semi-senile Brokaw thinks? we are having an investigation to find out if there are "goods" at a level that would impeach Trump. a real journalist wouldn't be speculating so early.

As in “real journalist”, I guess you mean the the perpetrators of the nightly “bombshells” that CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, etc keep having their anchors and pundits spew out.

As for the “investigation”, what it amounts to is the Democrats continuing to throw shit against a wall in the hopes that one little turd might stick.

Which one are we on now. #500.?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

That would be the additional one cause all the others went zip. It's still continuous and ongoing harrassment.

.

We didn't harass Obama that way....oh wait we did. Then we went after Clinton with constant Benghazi investigations to weaken her ...

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

As in “real journalist”, I guess you mean the the perpetrators of the nightly “bombshells” that CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, etc keep having their anchors and pundits spew out.

As for the “investigation”, what it amounts to is the Democrats continuing to throw shit against a wall in the hopes that one little turd might stick.

Which one are we on now. #500.?

Benghazi!

[bambino]

Originally Posted by WTF

We didn't harass Obama that way....oh wait we did. Then we went after Clinton with constant Benghazi investigations to weaken her ...

Oh, you’re a Hillary fan now? People died.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by bambino

Oh, you’re a Hillary fan now? People died.

Nope...I'mpointing out how cry baby bitchy you and others sound squealing about Trump being harassed.

But every day people die....wasn't Clinton's fault. And not one single investigation blamed her....all GOP led btw.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

Nope...I'mpointing out how cry baby bitchy you and others sound squealing about Trump being harassed.

But every day people die....wasn't Clinton's fault. And not one single investigation blamed her....all GOP led btw.

The U.S. Code of Federal Regulations stipulates that it was hildebeest's fucking JOB to provide adequate security for the ambassador.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The U.S. Code of Federal Regulations stipulates that it was hildebeest's fucking JOB to provide adequate security for the ambassador.

I said that none of the GOP investigations blamed Clinton....

So please quit changing every subject you fucking Revenge Porn promoter!