Quote:
Originally Posted by Baconman
Welcome Back Rod! Actually they are pretty close if you really read the reviews. Since you have been silent it seems people are writing more realistic ones. If you read between the lines you can get the real deal. And consider the source.
|
Pretty sure im reading THIS "YES" REVIEW right now. Not many lines to read between here. This hobbyist enjoyed his experience and stated he would see Angelina again. Then another hobbyist (WHO HASN'T WRITTEN A REVIEW ON BUXOM BEAUTY or ANY OTHER PROVIDER) claims to have seen her on the same day has a very different recount experience.
Instead of writing his own encounter report he decided to high jack another hobbyist review by taking the time to write a more descriptive no review on this hobbyists YES REVIEW on his maiden Eccie post. Things that make you go HMMMMMM....
I guess everyone seems more creditable before evidence is presented. However with the level of hearsay, rumor, and word of mouth in the Arkansas Eccie forum. Im positive had this provider been upcharging clients for position switching for over a year, we would've heard about it but now SURELY. Also with the level of scrutiny and suspicion the Arkansas good ole boys club fraternity applies towards newbies it's kind of surprising to see how much credibility many "seasoned" hobbyist have so easily granted to a member of 3wks who's lone post is in direct contradiction to the actual Reviewers account of events, especially in this new age of a REAL reviews. In fact his accounts are in direct contradiction to all of Angelina's reviews. If it quacks like duck... buck,buck buck
Nobody told me we changed the good ole boys club initiation guidelines. Pm me next time fellows