Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!
FIND GIRLS
Shemales
HOT SEARCH
REGISTER
REPORT TRAFFICKING
Image Scrapbook
BROWSE BIO PAGES
Available Now
SEARCH LADIES
PAY FOR PREMIUM ACCESS
DISCOUNTED BANNER SUBSCRIPTIONS
SEARCH
M.ECCIE.NET

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
Reload this Page THIS IS THE BIGGEST BUNCH OF HORSESHIT.
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Starscream66 290
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
George Spelvin 286
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 260
Top Posters
DallasRain71094
biomed165547
Yssup Rider61777
gman4454095
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49168
WTF48267
pyramider46388
bambino43480
The_Waco_Kid38559
CryptKicker37338
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-25-2018, 03:11 AM   #1
bb1961
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 7,266
Default THIS IS THE BIGGEST BUNCH OF HORSESHIT.
The Democrats in Washington have ABSOLUTELY no MORALS or SHAME!!
They definitely are a bunch of amoral shameless FUCKS!!
This sums them up in a nutshell.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kavanaugh...212308350.html
bb1961 is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 05:52 AM   #2
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default
It make you wonder if these Government Officials even are listening to what they are saying.

Forget about due process. Forget about a person facing their accuser. Forget about the concept of a person being innocent untill proven guilty.

It seems someone can step up with any accusation and do it with impunity. These accusers have no fear of legal reprisals, because nobody is willing to call them out for what they are.

It is going to be very interesting to see what MsDr Ford has to say when she is put under oath.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 07:29 AM   #3
rexdutchman
Valued Poster
 
rexdutchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
Encounters: 22
Default
unbelievably LEGAL STANDARDS in this country are being pushed away by the social justice warriors ,The new four letter word is FACT.(s)
The liberals just want you to BELIEVE
rexdutchman is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 07:38 AM   #4
Yssup Rider
BANNED
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,777
Encounters: 67
Default
Hysterical obsession much?

Sounds like some of you think that McConnell’s approach on Garland wasn’t such a great move after all!
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 08:10 AM   #5
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
Hysterical obsession much?

Sounds like some of you think that McConnell’s approach on Garland wasn’t such a great move after all!

did you forget the biden doctrine????


why is it okay when Democrats do it, but not when Republicans do it??? hmmmm?????
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 08:15 AM   #6
bambino
Valued Poster
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 43,480
Encounters: 29
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
Hysterical obsession much?

Sounds like some of you think that McConnell’s approach on Garland wasn’t such a great move after all!
That was a Presidential election, this election is not. Only Presidents can nominate Justices, not Congress. Besides, didn’t Hillary have a 98% chance of winning?

WELP
bambino is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 08:20 AM   #7
Yssup Rider
BANNED
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,777
Encounters: 67
Default
I beg to differ, bb1961

THIS MAY BE THE BIGGEST BUNCH OF HORSESHIT
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 08:20 AM   #8
Yssup Rider
BANNED
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,777
Encounters: 67
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino View Post
That was a Presidential election, this election is not. Only Presidents can nominate Justices, not Congress. Besides, didn’t Hillary have a 98% chance of winning?

WELP
Really, bambino?

So the people don’t get to decide anymore?

Just checking.
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 08:30 AM   #9
MT Pockets
Valued Poster
 
MT Pockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 9, 2016
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,234
Encounters: 20
Default
The article even explains this is not a courtroom. Innocent until proven guilty does not apply. If the majority find he is unsuitable he will not face charges.
As for being too close to the election, it was a valid point when the GOP did it but not the Dems?
Obama's pick should have been on the table after the election still and voted on but that didn't happen. It will with Trumps though.
The GOP set the precedent when they took Obama's Nomination away.
MT Pockets is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 08:32 AM   #10
Yssup Rider
BANNED
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,777
Encounters: 67
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by MT Pockets View Post
The article even explains this is not a courtroom. Innocent until proven guilty does not apply. If the majority find he is unsuitable he will not face charges.
As for being too close to the election, it was a valid point when the GOP did it but not the Dems?
Obama's pick should have been on the table after the election still and voted on but that didn't happen. It will with Trumps though.
The GOP set the precedent when they took Obama's Nomination away.
Correct.

Why are our friends on the right so intent on looking the other way?
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 09:03 AM   #11
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by MT Pockets View Post
The article even explains this is not a courtroom. Innocent until proven guilty does not apply. If the majority find he is unsuitable he will not face charges.
As for being too close to the election, it was a valid point when the GOP did it but not the Dems?
Obama's pick should have been on the table after the election still and voted on but that didn't happen. It will with Trumps though.
The GOP set the precedent when they took Obama's Nomination away.
To Advise and Consent. That is what the Senate's Constitutional Mandate is.

I agree that this is not a Court of Law. But, all of the penalties concerning pergury are in play.

Like I said. I want to see what MsDr Ford has to say when she is bound by these rules.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 09:22 AM   #12
bb1961
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 7,266
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm View Post
did you forget the biden doctrine????


why is it okay when Democrats do it, but not when Republicans do it??? hmmmm?????
His memory is...SHORT and SELECTIVE
bb1961 is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 09:24 AM   #13
TheDaliLama
Valued Poster
 
TheDaliLama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 6, 2010
Location: Ikoyi Club 1938
Posts: 7,141
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
I beg to differ, bb1961

THIS MAY BE THE BIGGEST BUNCH OF HORSESHIT
There’s got to be a pony in there somewhere.
TheDaliLama is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 09:28 AM   #14
bb1961
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 7,266
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
I beg to differ, bb1961

THIS MAY BE THE BIGGEST BUNCH OF HORSESHIT
I glad your smelling it too.
By the way...no need to beg around here.
bb1961 is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 09:32 AM   #15
bb1961
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 7,266
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
To Advise and Consent. That is what the Senate's Constitutional Mandate is.

I agree that this is not a Court of Law. But, all of the penalties concerning pergury are in play.

Like I said. I want to see what MsDr Ford has to say when she is bound by these rules.
That lying bitch ain't going to testify!!
bb1961 is offline   Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved

Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Forum Guidelines - Top