SCOTUS: Only police lives matter

[eccieuser9500]

Police Shootings Stir Outrage Among Some, But Not The Supreme Court

"The majority today exacerbates that troubling asymmetry. Its decision is not just wrong on the law; it also sends an alarming signal to law enforcement officers and the public. It tells officers that they can shoot first and think later, and it tells the public that palpably unreasonable conduct will go unpunished. Because there is nothing right or just under the law about this, I respectfully dissent."

















I 2nd that.

[Hotrod511]

If you have a weapon of sort, knife, gun, and they say to drop that weapon and you don't its a real good possibility you may get shot

[Guest123018-4]

Yep and yep.

I believe that the Supreme Court has ruled far too often against our liberties when giving law enforcement rights over the citizen.

While I have respect for law enforcement, I do not have any trust in them at all.
It is no wonder that so many people refuse to talk to law enforcement.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Police Shootings Stir Outrage Among Some, But Not The Supreme Court

"The majority today exacerbates that troubling asymmetry. Its decision is not just wrong on the law; it also sends an alarming signal to law enforcement officers and the public. It tells officers that they can shoot first and think later, and it tells the public that palpably unreasonable conduct will go unpunished. Because there is nothing right or just under the law about this, I respectfully dissent."

















I 2nd that.

So, if Sotomayer is being robbed at gunpoint, will she tell the police not to shoot the robber?

[Mr MojoRisin]

An Officer drives up and a women is hacking at a tree with a kitchen knife. My first thought would be she's a bit nuts. Any officer would be inclined to approach her and investigate why she would be behaving in that manner and I also think its reasonable to command her to drop the knife. Its pretty difficult to say what the Officers perspective is just based on that article, but a goofy bitch with a knife who refuses to give it up good chance I would shoot her too. At this time I am calling justified shooting.

Jim

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

So, if Sotomayer is being robbed at gunpoint, will she tell the police not to shoot the robber?

Only if she is acting as their attorney. I guess. They broke the law in that case. According to her. "Palpably unreasonable."

Apples to oranges? No need for semantics. Two different circumstances. Do you understand Kid?

[eccieuser9500]

"One day this nation will rise up. Live out the true meaning of its creed."

The law is the law. I disagree with it.

I'm still outraged.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Only if she is acting as their attorney. I guess. They broke the law according to her. "Palpably unreasonable."

so the "minority report" is the right one? that figures in your case.

you go outside with a large kitchen knife and start chopping on a tree in your front yard and when the police show up, don't drop it when told to.

let's see what happens next ..

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

. . . in your front yard . . .

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

i prefer my own yard sign, liberal faggot. notice my neighbor also has a Trump sign in his yard.

[eccieuser9500]

Simple fascist fag. The both of you.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Simple fascist fag. The both of you.

why do you bother, loser? you won't change any opinions here with your so-called "thought provoking" socialist rubbish.

do you like to get insulted? is it some sadomasochistic thing? you should ask a Doctor about that ..

when Ginsberg kicks the bucket Trump will appoint a conservative judge .. again.

remember that it was Harry Reid and the demotards who stonewalled Bush's right as sitting president to appoint new justice yeah?
where was the outrage then? when Obama got the "Harry Reid rule" shoved up his ass you all ran around like it was a travesty.

payback is always painful. Trump made the pick, not Obama.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

why do you bother, loser? you won't change any opinions here with your so-called "thought provoking" socialist rubbish.

do you like to get insulted? is it some sadomasochistic thing? you should ask a Doctor about that ..

when Ginsberg kicks the bucket Trump will appoint a conservative judge .. again.

remember that it was Harry Reid and the demotards who stonewalled Bush's right as sitting president to appoint new justice yeah?
where was the outrage then? when Obama got the "Harry Reid rule" shoved up his ass you all ran around like it was a travesty.

payback is always painful. Trump made the pick, not Obama.

That faggot has no idea what you’re talking about. Par for the course.

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Simple fascist fag. The both of you.

Instead of playing arm chair Quarterback, tell the forum how you would have handled that situation.


Jim

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Yep and yep.

I believe that the Supreme Court has ruled far too often against our liberties when giving law enforcement rights over the citizen.

In some ways i do agree.. BUT in the case of this shooting, i think the scotus was right, that she WAS WARNED repeatedly to drop the weapon, then supposedly made an advance towards the other person in the room. So the cops shot her.. ERGO imo she should NOT have a case to sue the cops..

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

so the "minority report" is the right one? that figures in your case.

you go outside with a large kitchen knife and start chopping on a tree in your front yard and when the police show up, don't drop it when told to.

let's see what happens next ..

If i am in my own front yard, AND THERE'S no one else that i am threatening, the cops would NOT BE justified in shooting me though.