North Carolina Finds 2,214 Registered Voters over the Age of 110

[TheDaliLama]

http://nevo.news/index.php/2016/08/1...he-age-of-110/

North Carolina voters roll shows that the Tar Heel State has 2,214 voters that are 110-years-old. Most of these voters are democrats and most seem to live in four democrat-controlled counties. Some of these aged voters have already voted absentee.

Many are even older than 110. In fact, it seems that NC has an awful lot of voters that are 112, too. The Carolina Transparency project did a review of the voter rolls this year and found that there are 631 Democrats who are 112 or older. By contrast, the Republicans can only find 229 over 112 voters in the state (and “unaffiliated” found 39).


And it gets worse. Two voters — and, yes, they’ve already voted in early voting — are over 150! One in Gaston County is 154 and another in Granville County is an astonishing 160!

This isn’t necessarily evidence of vote theft. It could be a massively failed voter registration system, although it is notable that the largest number of these voters just happen to be Democrats. But what ever is the case, it is highly unlikely to have this many centenarian voters still able to get out of their wheelchairs or retirement homes and have a run down to the polling place. Something certainly seems amiss in North Carolina.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

http://nevo.news/index.php/2016/08/1...he-age-of-110/

North Carolina voters roll shows that the Tar Heel State has 2,214 voters that are 110-years-old. Most of these voters are democrats and most seem to live in four democrat-controlled counties. Some of these aged voters have already voted absentee.

Many are even older than 110. In fact, it seems that NC has an awful lot of voters that are 112, too. The Carolina Transparency project did a review of the voter rolls this year and found that there are 631 Democrats who are 112 or older. By contrast, the Republicans can only find 229 over 112 voters in the state (and “unaffiliated” found 39).


And it gets worse. Two voters — and, yes, they’ve already voted in early voting — are over 150! One in Gaston County is 154 and another in Granville County is an astonishing 160!

This isn’t necessarily evidence of vote theft. It could be a massively failed voter registration system, although it is notable that the largest number of these voters just happen to be Democrats. But what ever is the case, it is highly unlikely to have this many centenarian voters still able to get out of their wheelchairs or retirement homes and have a run down to the polling place. Something certainly seems amiss in North Carolina.

ROFL .. this is why the demmy's HATE Voter ID laws ..

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/...or-voting.html









have to slip this one in ... tooooooooo funny!!!!

[TheDaliLama]

I think a lot of the people they are polling aren't going to show up on Election Day. I think there's something going on when only 40 people show up to her rallys.

She's going to need every illegal immigrant and dead person's vote she can dig up..

[Yssup Rider]

More than that in South Texas.

[TheDaliLama]

Don't forget...that Hillary had to cheat to beat 74 year old Commie.

[gnadfly]

And had to have the DNC hierarchy to help her.

[LexusLover]

Her buddy, Governor of Virginia, by EXECUTIVE ORDER authorized 200,000 convicted felons to vote, was struck down by the Supreme Court, and now is doing it again ... in "lots" up to 180,000 voters.

[gnadfly]

So if they were convicted of voter fraud, they could legally commit voter fraud again. Do they get a free handgun with that voter card too?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

So if they were convicted of voter fraud, they could legally commit voter fraud again. Do they get a free handgun with that voter card too?

That was crossing my mind .... if they have enough sense to vote ... how about enough sense to own/possess a firearm!!!!

I'm sure it will further deepen the love of LE for HillaryNoMore and her errand Boy, the Gov of Virginia, .....

..... look familiar ...



...he is what is a "true insider"! The "Provider of the Politicians"!!!!

[MT Pockets]

You guys are a trip. Let me give you a hint the majority of them say they are 116 years old not 110. Last year they were all 115. The year before 14. Anyone care to try out their cognitive skills?

[Yssup Rider]

Grip. Grip. Grip.

WAAAHHHH. WAAAHHHH. WAAAHHHH.

Now run home to your Mommy.

Ignorant fucking Trumpites.

[MT Pockets]

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress....r-fraud-in-nc/

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

http://nevo.news/index.php/2016/08/1...he-age-of-110/

North Carolina voters roll shows that the Tar Heel State has 2,214 voters that are 110-years-old. Most of these voters are democrats and most seem to live in four democrat-controlled counties. Some of these aged voters have already voted absentee.

Many are even older than 110. In fact, it seems that NC has an awful lot of voters that are 112, too. The Carolina Transparency project did a review of the voter rolls this year and found that there are 631 Democrats who are 112 or older. By contrast, the Republicans can only find 229 over 112 voters in the state (and “unaffiliated” found 39).


And it gets worse. Two voters — and, yes, they’ve already voted in early voting — are over 150! One in Gaston County is 154 and another in Granville County is an astonishing 160!

This isn’t necessarily evidence of vote theft. It could be a massively failed voter registration system, although it is notable that the largest number of these voters just happen to be Democrats. But what ever is the case, it is highly unlikely to have this many centenarian voters still able to get out of their wheelchairs or retirement homes and have a run down to the polling place. Something certainly seems amiss in North Carolina.

Don't any of you check the dates? The article is almost 4 years old.
It tells you the number of voters 112 and older but not the total of dem/reps/undecided there are of the 2200+ total.
If they could show the dems outnumbered the reps they would. Everyone knows that. Plus I couldn't find any follow up stories at all

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Don't any of you check the dates? The article is almost 4 years old.
It tells you the number of voters 112 and older but not the total of dem/reps/undecided there are of the 2200+ total.
If they could show the dems outnumbered the reps they would. Everyone knows that. Plus I couldn't find any follow up stories at all

He didn't care about the facts. Those pesky things get in the way of a good spin. The link I posted has an update in it.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

He didn't care about the facts.

You live in a fact-free bubble inside your trashy trailer park home. Go fetch another bottle of Dew and a pack of Newports, pockboy.