Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 398
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70819
biomed163628
Yssup Rider61234
gman4453341
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48794
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43216
The_Waco_Kid37390
CryptKicker37228
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117
View Poll Results: DO YOU THINK THIS IS WASTEFUL GOVERNMENT SPENDING?
Yes 10 83.33%
No 2 16.67%
Not Sure 0 0%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2014, 08:48 AM   #1
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default DO YOU THINK THIS IS WASTEFUL SPENDING ????

Obama administration to spend $20 BILLION on helicopter program to replace his private fleet of 23 choppers.

The contract will buy 23 SIkorsky helicopters at an estimated cost of $400 million each – about the cost of the Air Force One 747 jet.

Duplicate choppers fly as decoys whenever a president takes off from the South Lawn; others are flown to Obama's travel destinations in advance. Just one company bid on the project, raising questions about whether the Navy got a fair price
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 09:06 AM   #2
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
Obama administration to spend $20 BILLION on helicopter program to replace his private fleet of 23 choppers.

The contract will buy 23 SIkorsky helicopters at an estimated cost of $400 million each – about the cost of the Air Force One 747 jet.

Duplicate choppers fly as decoys whenever a president takes off from the South Lawn; others are flown to Obama's travel destinations in advance. Just one company bid on the project, raising questions about whether the Navy got a fair price

pssssssssssssssstttt

Obie didn't invent duplicate vehicles for Presidents ... he doesn't need 6 Suburbans either but he' s got em just like other Presidents did and will in the future ... its called security... study up!
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 09:36 AM   #3
JCM800
Ambassador
 
JCM800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 23, 2012
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 13,233
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
Duplicate choppers fly as decoys whenever a president takes off from the South Lawn; others are flown to Obama's travel destinations in advance. Just one company bid on the project, raising questions about whether the Navy got a fair price
Are you suggesting that they don't or shouldn't use duplicates, and eliminate any form of security?
JCM800 is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 09:42 AM   #4
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JCM800 View Post
Are you suggesting that they don't or shouldn't use duplicates, and eliminate any form of security?
Air Force 1 & 2 ... one goes down or is a hangar being updated and there's another ready for the President to use for emergencies ... any President

FACT !


CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 09:46 AM   #5
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,234
Encounters: 67
Default

No, let's commission another couple of committees on Benghazi.
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 10:21 AM   #6
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

You leftie are so fucking dumb...in your fucked up world it is either one way or nothing............and yes 23 helicopters is a waste..........how about 15 ? Plenty of room for duplicates....and hey, how about competitive bidding????

15 helicopters isn't "eliminating any form of security"..........You are fucking idiot for thinking that downsizing is eliminating all form of security for the president.

Why are you lefties wasteful spenders of our tax dollars ???


Quote:
Originally Posted by JCM800 View Post
Are you suggesting that they don't or shouldn't use duplicates, and eliminate any form of security?
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 10:29 AM   #7
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JCM800 View Post
Are you suggesting that they don't or shouldn't use duplicates, and eliminate any form of security?
Why was Valerie Jarett's (Odumbo's puppet-master) American security detail in Martha's Vineyard larger than Ambassador Steven's American security detail in Benghazi, 1-800-JCM-DATO: the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's soiled breechclout?
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 10:48 AM   #8
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
Obama administration to spend $20 BILLION on helicopter program to replace his private fleet of 23 choppers.

The contract will buy 23 SIkorsky helicopters at an estimated cost of $400 million each – about the cost of the Air Force One 747 jet.

Duplicate choppers fly as decoys whenever a president takes off from the South Lawn; others are flown to Obama's travel destinations in advance. Just one company bid on the project, raising questions about whether the Navy got a fair price


Not sure, the ones in use now were built in the 70's with all the new threats there will have to be updates in security.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 11:02 AM   #9
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
You leftie are so fucking dumb...in your fucked up world it is either one way or nothing............and yes 23 helicopters is a waste..........how about 15 ? Plenty of room for duplicates....and hey, how about competitive bidding????

15 helicopters isn't "eliminating any form of security"..........You are fucking idiot for thinking that downsizing is eliminating all form of security for the president.

Why are you lefties wasteful spenders of our tax dollars ???


in the event of a national emergency that posed a threat to the leaders of this country, exactly how many choppers would you consider helpful should they (top Republicans too) need to ferry away from Washington and to safety ... 1 or 2 ?


you dumbass
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 11:27 AM   #10
Mr MojoRisin
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Sep 3, 2011
Location: Here
Posts: 7,567
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
You leftie are so fucking dumb...in your fucked up world it is either one way or nothing............and yes 23 helicopters is a waste..........how about 15 ? Plenty of room for duplicates....and hey, how about competitive bidding????

15 helicopters isn't "eliminating any form of security"..........You are fucking idiot for thinking that downsizing is eliminating all form of security for the president.

Why are you lefties wasteful spenders of our tax dollars ???
Cause they are all grandiose thinkers. Besides these idiots all have Bi-Polar Disorder anyway so don't expect any logic from them. Twenty Three Helicopters is over kill. Motherfuckers only need a few.


Jim
Mr MojoRisin is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 11:36 AM   #11
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

In 2003, the DoD issued a Request for Proposals (basically an open solicitation bid sent out to defense contractors when the government wants new gear) for 23 new helicopters to replace the entire existing fleet—Sea Kings and NightHawks alike—designated the VXX proposal. Only two groups responded: Sikorsky (working with GE, Northrop, and others), which proposed a derivative of the H-92 Superhawk and chopper transport of choice for many heads of state; and AgustaWestland (along with Bell and Lockheed), which put forth the VH-71 Kestrel an American version of AugustaWestland's very successful EH101 Merlin medium lift helicopter.
SExpand
By January 2005, the Navy decided to go with the VH-71, redesignating it the US101. This 18-seat (4 crew, 14 passengers) all-weather helicopter measures 64 feet long and 22 feet high with a 61-foot rotor diameter powered by three 2,520HP GE CT7-8E turboshafts. It was originally designed as a Combat Search and Rescue platform. The Navy awarded the initial $1.7 billion contract to AugustaWestland, pre-production design began, and that's where the trouble started.
The project was immediately beset by cost overruns, and by 2007—two years its kickoff—the development and retrofit costs alone had ballooned by 40 percent ($2.4 billion) over initial estimates. By 2008, building the entire fleet of 23 whirly-birds would cost a staggering $11.2 billion—$400 million per bird, about what an Air Force One 747 would run you—up from $4.2 billion just three years before.
This near-tripling of cost did not sit well with the newly elected Obama administration. Running on a platform of change and fiscal responsibility after nearly a decade of ongoing military incursions into the Middle East, the incoming administration viewed the bloated VXX program as a meaty means of demonstrating both campaign promises to a waiting American public.
SExpand
Despite the Navy in 2008 giving the go-ahead on the project (knowing full well about exorbitant cost), the VXX program ended in February 2009—after the price had risen again to a solid $13 billion—at the behest of President Obama himself. Instead, he directed that the remaining funds being applied towards upgrading the current Sea King/NightHawk fleet. Simply solution, right? Not quite, said the Congressional Research Service.
The CRS ran the numbers on the President's plan and discovered that axing the VH-71 and retrofitting the VH-3D would, in the long run, end up costing the US taxpayers somewhere in the range of $14 billion - $21 billion—not to mention the $3 billion they'd already blown on the Kestrel R&D so far. A savings bonanza, it was not. Plus any future fleet purchases wouldn't be affordable until at least 2024, by which point the Sea Kings would be nearly eligible for Social Security.
Instead, the CRS put forth a four-option proposal for moving forward with a variation of the existing Kestrel program: One, continue the Kestrel model as currently developed (the Increment I and II versions, think of them as progressive prototype revisions). This option would cost about $10 billion and have the choppers in the air by 2019. Two, build 23 units of just the Increment I Kestrel. That would cost only $6.4 billion and would have had them ready by 2012. Three, build just 19 Increment I's for $5.9 billion and also be ready by last year. Finally, spend just $1.4 billion to upgrade the existing Sea King fleet though that wouldn't actually satisfy any of the requirements for future presidential helicopters and would still need to be replaced in the coming decades.
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 11:44 AM   #12
JCM800
Ambassador
 
JCM800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 23, 2012
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 13,233
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
You leftie are so fucking dumb...in your fucked up world it is either one way or nothing............and yes 23 helicopters is a waste..........how about 15 ? Plenty of room for duplicates....and hey, how about competitive bidding????

How do you know that 23 helicopters is a waste? ...What if 15 isn't enough?

Do you know what each copter is assigned to do on a daily basis?

Nope.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
15 helicopters isn't "eliminating any form of security"..........You are fucking idiot for thinking that downsizing is eliminating all form of security for the president.
So now you're an expert on security?

And you know how many helicopters are needed on a daily basis for the President?
JCM800 is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 11:53 AM   #13
JCM800
Ambassador
 
JCM800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 23, 2012
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 13,233
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Why was Valerie Jarett's (Odumbo's puppet-master) American security detail in Martha's Vineyard larger than Ambassador Steven's American security detail in Benghazi, 1-800-JCM-DATO: the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's soiled breechclout?

Wrong thread IB.

You're easily lost though.

Try one of the several other Benghazi threads currently going on in the Political Forum.

You're welcome.
JCM800 is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 12:02 PM   #14
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

Why does one president need 23 helicopters? Good question, said the Congressional Research Service in a report this month on the Navy’s program to buy the specially fitted VH-71 helicopters from Lockheed Martin Corp. The Navy doesn’t give reasons for needing more choppers in the inventory, the report says, adding: “It appears reasonable to ask whether an operational force of 19 new and more-capable helicopters couldn’t replace an operational force of 19 old and less-capable helicopters.”

Eisenhower had 13 ! Prior presidents have been operating with 19 helicopters; they probably could get by with less, but oh how federal bureaucrats love to waste money !




Quote:
Originally Posted by JCM800 View Post
How do you know that 23 helicopters is a waste? ...What if 15 isn't enough?

Do you know what each copter is assigned to do on a daily basis?

Nope.

So now you're an expert on security?

And you know how many helicopters are needed on a daily basis for the President?
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 12:46 PM   #15
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
Why does one president need 23 helicopters? Good question, said the Congressional Research Service in a report this month on the Navy’s program to buy the specially fitted VH-71 helicopters from Lockheed Martin Corp. The Navy doesn’t give reasons for needing more choppers in the inventory, the report says, adding: “It appears reasonable to ask whether an operational force of 19 new and more-capable helicopters couldn’t replace an operational force of 19 old and less-capable helicopters.”

Eisenhower had 13 ! Prior presidents have been operating with 19 helicopters; they probably could get by with less, but oh how federal bureaucrats love to waste money !


Why don't you check with the Pentagon who ordered them or the Marines who maintain them?
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved