Quote:
Originally Posted by CurvyKatie
How would explaining a rebuttal to a review help in the ladies area? The point of the rebuttal is so that it can be viewed by the gentlemen. The ladies are not planning on purchasing a session from Cam.
Or is this question really just rude attempt to tell us ladies to leave coed and go have our discussions elsewhere?
Don't you have a men's locker room?
|
You said coed was the only place to post a rebuttal. I asked a simple question.
Then you get your panties all in a wad because you read some kind of intent into my question that wasn't even there.
As far as the point of posting in Co-ed goes I understand your point but as I said in an earlier post these things usually go off the rails. It happens time and time again.
Here is what I've learned from this thread. It's pretty evident that Cameron didn't screen as thoroughly as she should have. She took an appointment based on a reference that never got back to her. She went ahead anyway. Since he had a reference it doesn't sound like she used alternative screening as she would for a newbie. I don't know if it's a one off nor do I know the reason if it is a one off. That's all her business to do how she pleases. I'm not telling her how to do anything. What I am saying is that depending on who's gleaning what from the information in now over 100 posts it could be good or it could be bad, again depending on which side of the fence you're on and what you're looking to take from it.
Iquit and whatever other handles he has have been banned. We all know the guy will be back. Probably already is. He'll do the same thing to another provider. There seems to be a handful of these guys who keep doing it. I have no idea how to prevent them from getting a new handle. Seems like giving them a false sense of security on the open board and exposing them in a more appropriate private area he doesn't have access to might prevent some of the new handles being created as soon as the old one is exposes. But then that would require discipline none of us has.
That's why a rebuttal in coed needs to be carefully considered. The rebuttal itself is fine, they just usually take an unintended direction. That's the part that needs to be considered. Is the risk tolerable?
Katie, You recently have found yourself in defense mode about a comment you made in another thread. It was an innocent comment that I thought was pretty damned sexy but some fucktards apparently read something into it that wasn't there and you had to do damage control. I think you mentioned that you wished you hadn't ever made the comment.
A provider with an otherwise good reputation and pages of yes reviews should probably let a single bad review roll off their backs. Us gentlemen are smart enough to figure it out. The risk is not worth taking IMHO.
Here's some advice for anyone that wants it, you can take it or leave it. With the exception of those who have proven themselves to be trolls and in the absence of some universally recognized and accepted fonts for such things as a particular emotion, sarcasm or even body language, etc, best practice would be to try not reading any intent beyond what is in black and white on the page. Take what is written for face value. Most likely, the person blindly assigning the intent will get it wrong. This is especially important to remember if you are thin skinned or easily offended.
My Bio Page - Texas - Houston
My Bio Page - Texas - Houston
bullshit !
