AMERICAN AMBASSADOR GANG RAPED THEN MURDERED BY MUSLIMS

[JD Barleycorn]

I'll post here instead of adding up above. Liberals should be very wary of talking about erradication because it is part of your history. The early progressives believed in eugenics which was all about weeding out the weak. That includes Woodrow Wilson and Margaret Sanger. It was the Cold Harbor Group that sent representatives to Germany to sell their program to Hitler.

So libs, erradication is all tied up in your history. You have the history of mass murder to live down here, Germany, the Soviet Union, China, North Korea, and Cambodia. You should all be ashamed for not knowing your roots and being part of the problem.

[CJ7]

no

and youre easily impressed

[Fancyinheels]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Skyler you use of the Nazi meme is offensive and way off target. This is a matter of the proper punishment for some and the protection of the United States and west. What Hitler did had nothing to do with self defense or punishment. You owe a lot of people a real apology.

As for the bastards in Benghazi, take off, nuke em from orbit. It is the only way to be sure.

I can see the analogy. Hitler wanted to wipe all Jews off the planet, and many people would like to see all Muslims blown to Allah. Hitler was thinking kill everyone but the perfect and pure "Master Race." Some factions want to kill all Americans because we are heathen Christians with an immoral society, some want to kill all heathen Muslims because they lump them all together with terrorists who will die for those 1000 virgins. There's a little bit of Hitler going on with both sides, and that's to be expected under the circumstances.

Tolerance and wisdom have to be balanced with outrage and action, or we all end up offing each other.

[Guest032516]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

Is it your fear of being called racist that makes you bend over backwards to put the most positive spin on Muslim behavior? You've got two cases of angry Muslim mobs sexually brutalizing people, and you won't admit that it increases the likelihood, it's happened again.

I think it's "weird" that you are carrying the water for our enemies.

Stop projecting your own fears onto me.

If you look, you will find more than a couple of threads where I called the Muslim fundies ragheads or worse. I have zero fear of being called racist. It is typically a sign of desperation by whomever you are arguing with.

And now YOU have to get it straight. The story is FALSE. It is a HOAX. Pointing to the sexual abuse of Lara Logan and the non-sexual abuse of Khaddafy does NOT "increase the likelihood" that the Stevens story is true. It is still FALSE. it is still a hoax.

The only thing of which it increases the likelihood is that of people not trusting you in the future. I know I won't trust any one who tried to make the case that this report was true, because it COULD have been true.

From now on, any time I see a post from you, JD Barleycorn, Whirly or any of the others I will assume it is made up bullshit until I read from a reliable source that it is true.

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by ExNYer

Stop projecting your own fears onto me.

If you look, you will find more than a couple of threads where I called the Muslim fundies ragheads or worse. I have zero fear of being called racist. It is typically a sign of desperation by whomever you are arguing with.

And now YOU have to get it straight. The story is FALSE. It is a HOAX. Pointing to the sexual abuse of Lara Logan and the non-sexual abuse of Khaddafy does NOT "increase the likelihood" that the Stevens story is true. It is still a FALSE. it is still a hoax.

The only thing that of which it increases the likelihood is that of people not trusting you in the future. I know I won't trust any one who tried to make the case that this report was true, because it COULD have been true.

From now on, any time I see a post from you, JD Barleycorn, Whirly or any of the others I will assume it is made up bullshit until I read from a reliable source that it is true.

By all means, put me on ignore. It won't hurt my feelings.

[DallasRain]

outrageous!

[AdventureAdams]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I'll post here instead of adding up above. Liberals should be very wary of talking about erradication because it is part of your history. The early progressives believed in eugenics which was all about weeding out the weak. That includes Woodrow Wilson and Margaret Sanger. It was the Cold Harbor Group that sent representatives to Germany to sell their program to Hitler.

So libs, erradication is all tied up in your history. You have the history of mass murder to live down here, Germany, the Soviet Union, China, North Korea, and Cambodia. You should all be ashamed for not knowing your roots and being part of the problem.

Did you read the OP Joe is the one talking about eradicating a whole group of people based on their faith- not me. I'm not the person negatively canvassing people based on the acts of a few. You can try to flip it anyway you want but when you catch me saying something as idiotic as he did you can gladly call me out.

I am aware of AMERICA's ( not just liberals) history and as they say if we forget whats happened before us, history is bound to repeat itself over and over again.

I don't apologize for SHIT- I'm sure some of you are familiar with that policy.

[AdventureAdams]

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

I can see the analogy. Hitler wanted to wipe all Jews off the planet, and many people would like to see all Muslims blown to Allah. Hitler was thinking kill everyone but the perfect and pure "Master Race." Some factions want to kill all Americans because we are heathen Christians with an immoral society, some want to kill all heathen Muslims because they lump them all together with terrorists who will die for those 1000 virgins. There's a little bit of Hitler going on with both sides, and that's to be expected under the circumstances.

Tolerance and wisdom have to be balanced with outrage and action, or we all end up offing each other.

Absolute poetry my dear, some people need to stop being defensive and realize the hate they spew out of their mouth is no different than what other people are saying about us in America.

[I B Hankering]

History Of The Bosnian Muslim Nazi 13th SS Handzar Division

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNzTL4zu5Xg



The Arab Ba'ath Party (predecessor to Saddam's Ba'ath Party) was pro-Hitler and Nazism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Ba%27ath_Movement

[Whirlaway]

In the past two decades we have gone to war in defense of Muslims more than 6 times...costing us lives and treasury......

It is about time our foreign policy reflects our our own values and interest....enough with bending to the will of Islam.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

In the past two decades we have gone to war in defense of Muslims more than 6 times...costing us lives and treasury......

It is about time our foreign policy reflects our our own values and interest....enough with bending to the will of Islam.

Could you be more specific?

Could you break down the cost in lives and money on each front?

My guess Iraq and Afgan are head and shoulders abouve the other four.

I would also suggest that it is oil business we are after, not Muslim protection. We go to war for the benifit of a small segment of our society. Defense Contractors and Oli Interests.

[timpage]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

In the past two decades we have gone to war in defense of Muslims more than 6 times...costing us lives and treasury......

It is about time our foreign policy reflects our our own values and interest....enough with bending to the will of Islam.

As usual, you're on Pluto. We haven't gone to war "in defense of muslims". Our foreign policy and our past, current and future entanglement with the Middle East is the result of one thing: oil. There are plenty of Muslim countries around the world where we could give a shit less what happens....those would be the ones without any fossil fuel in the ground. We only get concerned about occurrences in Muslim countries when it threatens the oil spigot.

[CuteOldGuy]

Wow. I hate to ruin your day, Timmy, but I totally agree with you on that one.

[WTF]

But oil concerns and Defense concerns get gullible people like Whirly, jb, LK to believe it is a war of cultures.

All wars worth fighting are for resources. No resources and you won't have much of a war. That is why Bosnia was such a small affair.

But you can not tell our patriotic Tea Nuts anything like facts. They will call you cowardly.

[Dawgs]

Bosnia?