Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

boardman · 02-04-2010, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Lou

I read the review right after he posted it and he did menton the money parts and seemed to be very honest about the situation. What you aren't mentioning is that the BCD was eneded early because he didn't enjoy your service. This doesn't speak to how he may or may not have been treating you, but he did tell a pretty complete story.

I'm sure there are other variables in this equation, but one thing I know for sure is that in the last 2 weeks or so, I have read 2 less than favorable things about you, Natalie. That seems to stick with people. Maybe you have had the misfortune of two seperate jerks, or maybe there is an isssue with you...?

I'm not picking sides here becuase I really don't care. That being said, I would think you would be going out of your way to make sure that your clients end their sessions with you satisfied because the last two things I have read about you were less than flattering. Does this mean you should be abused? No. Does this mean that you should be accomodating even if you feel that you aren't being treated like the princess you want to be treated like? Yes. Remember who is paying who.

Just my thoughts on the situation.

Mckenzie called. She wants an "AMEN!"

carkido45 · 02-04-2010, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ibechill

I think he was over generous.

Wow tuff crowd. Funny though but tuff.

nataliejones · 02-04-2010, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Lou

I read the review right after he posted it and he did menton the money parts and seemed to be very honest about the situation. What you aren't mentioning is that the BCD was eneded early because he didn't enjoy your service. This doesn't speak to how he may or may not have been treating you, but he did tell a pretty complete story.

I'm sure there are other variables in this equation, but one thing I know for sure is that in the last 2 weeks or so, I have read 2 less than favorable things about you, Natalie. That seems to stick with people. Maybe you have had the misfortune of two seperate jerks, or maybe there is an isssue with you...?

I'm not picking sides here becuase I really don't care. That being said, I would think you would be going out of your way to make sure that your clients end their sessions with you satisfied because the last two things I have read about you were less than flattering. Does this mean you should be abused? No. Does this mean that you should be accomodating even if you feel that you aren't being treated like the princess you want to be treated like? Yes. Remember who is paying who.

Just my thoughts on the situation.

I believe I have been reviewed 4 times on this board. 3 of the reviewers were positive and did recommend me. You can see those reviews in my signature line. I know I go out of my way to be accommodating and I do not expect anyone to treat me like a princess all I ask is to be treated like a lady.

I did not mention that he did not enjoy my service as I thought that was obvious given the less than stellar review. The session never ended early as I had previously stated. I was there almost 3 1/2 hours trying to be as accommodating as could be given the circumstances.

I have said my part and I know that a less than stellar review may stick out however I also believe that my 3 positive reviews should speak for themselves.

I appreciate the positive comments and I also understand the negative ones. We are all entitled to our own opinions and judgements. I hope that those that can understand my point of view and who are still interested in seeing me know that I don't need to be treated like a princess...All I ask is to be treated like a lady and you will see that I will go that extra mile for you!

Guest110724 · 02-04-2010, 12:26 PM

+1 Big Lou

How is he suppose to treat you like a lady? Open the car door for you, etc? The only thing he should have done was be respectful. It seems like he did that, if not please elaborate for us.

How about treating the hobbyist like a client and not tell him to show more passion.

The other bad review was on a now defunct board. It implied some type of attempted bait and switch with your assistant.

Trnch · 02-04-2010, 12:31 PM

Oh Gee-sh, just because this is a new board does not mean that the old board has been forgotten. You take us for fools?

carkido45 · 02-04-2010, 12:39 PM

Since she had so many positive reviews why worry about this bad one.
Remember you may be a peach of a provider but not everyone likes peaches.

Fancyinheels · 02-04-2010, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dearhunter

Fancy,

Your perspective is illogical...............your reference of "at the time" is not in regards to a time sensitive piece of information.

You and she do not have BCD and would never know (theoretically).

If your logic is followed to its conclusion...........since he was honest about the $, he must have been honest about the rest of the BCD............and he was gentle with her beyond what she deserved.................if we follow the logic as it is framed in this thread.

"Logic" is in the mind of the person assessing the situation. To me, if the gentlemen said in public view that she charged $450 for 3+ hours and she knew that he just gave her $250, that should logically be corrected, and has nothing to do with what's actually written in the BCD section, and rate info should be current, so therefore is time sensitive. Also, it is critically time sensitive to have a phone number removed that a lady wants kept private.

You totally missed my point that a heck of a lot of fellows do not have BCD and/or are lurking, but are still potential clients. What was in BCD was not relevant to me at all. If he had a bad time he had a bad time, but he still needs to report accurate and necessary info in the PUBLIC section. He could have noted in that area that she charged $450, but had to settle for $250, or something along those lines, and that gents could see BCD for full explanation. (Might make 'em want to pony up for that type of info.) However, aren't reviewers suppose to state BOTH the charge and what was ACTUALLY paid while giving the stats?

Jasper · 02-04-2010, 08:49 PM

I have read all the banter back and forth and I have one item I would like to clarify.

Yes I was with Natalie for 3 hours. During which (and this is in order) we:
1.Got lost going to her favorite restaurant (which by the way was $200). My first time driving in Texas.
2.Then drove to her old neighborhood to see a house, and so she could write down some phones numbers.
3. The BCD included a mandated manicure because I snagged her stocking.
4. The portion of our evening that could not be viewed on TV was less than 30 minutes.

It really doesn't matter to me what anyone else thinks, my conscious is clear. I have many reviews on the now defunct ASPD. And my generosity towards providers has at times caused some consternation among other hobbiest.

Guest040810-3 · 02-04-2010, 09:32 PM

i don't see any reason for you to lose sleep over this Jasper. you explained your story quite well and Natalie was able to correct a few details also.

on the defunct board we use to have two pricing fields. one for the fee and another for total paid. I use the first field for quoted/printed fees. While total paid was for what was actually paid, whether it be higher or lower than normal fee, tips, and possibly room costs.

nataliejones · 02-04-2010, 10:16 PM

Since it seems that some are having a hard time reading between the lines of what I mean by treating me like a lady & not a piece of meat, and since Jasper obvioulsy will dare not admit that things went sour after his several attempts "to go where one should not GO" neither in the hobby or a one-night stand.

It doesn't matter if you have been recently tested, SAFETY to me is key. There I have said it. It can't get anymore clearer than that. THAT is why Jasper was not happy with my service because I was not willing to compromise my safety for him NOR for ANYONE for that matter.

Jasper, thank you again for dinner AND for ordering for us.

If some are still unable to see why I acted the way I did, then so be it. Even after his pursuing "that" I still tried to be as accommodating as I could but he really wasn't interested in anything else. THAT is the truth. I will NEVER compromise my safety or anyone else's bad review or not and that makes me a GOOD provider NOT a bad one.

Wayward · 02-04-2010, 10:33 PM

Now we have lit the candle on this sum bitch, no dog or pony in this show just enjoying the ride.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jasper

And my generosity towards providers has at times caused some consternation among other hobbiest.

That's not really what they say is it? Sorry for interrupting but that delightful turn of phrase had me rolling on the floor.

Natalie for what it is worth this never ends well. You have every right to do it. I'm just trying to remember when it has ever worked out in a positive way and I can't.

Trnch · 02-04-2010, 10:34 PM

Never Mind, Just let it go Nat.

jim262 · 02-05-2010, 02:24 AM

Save the drama for your momma!! Just sayin.

Jasper · 02-05-2010, 04:03 AM

natiles last comment was bullshit.
My recollection was when I ended our session, Natalie Nut Case was working on a BBBJ.
If that's unsafe for a provider, she should state that she only has CBJ. That way I'll know I don't want to see her in the first place.

enderwiggin · 02-05-2010, 08:09 AM

You can't please everyone all the time. If every provider got online and disputed every negative review, there would be an unending parade of "treat me like a lady" threads here and elsewhere.

Nat, if your accusations are true, the appropriate thing to do would be to post an alert. Otherwise, I'm calling bullshit. Either way, I don't think it's a coincidence that this is the second time in as many weeks you're in here defending your reputation.