Quote:
Originally Posted by Sisyphus
Very nice!! B&W photos just seem capable of delivering a delicious blend of elegance & eroticism that is so SO tough to capture in color.
I wish I could express precisely why. I just don't have the photographic vocabulary....
|
I agree. People tend to see B/W as old world artsy, so hence when something is produced in B/W it immediately takes on that appeal. I remember a discussion many years ago among fellow 'artsy' types about a fellows images. He had these images, snapshots if you will, of nude women against a white wall, mostly standing, no real posing and sincerely lacking in any posing merits. He was pawning them off as art and got defensive when challenged. Someone else produced some images done for advertising, women against a white wall, better posing/production. The discussion got heated with the argument that if the first fellows images were left as color, they would have no merit and that merely printing them in B/W was not sufficient to raise them to 'art' and if that was the marker for art, then printing the commercial images in B/W would change their status. I don't recall that conversation going anywhere.
I think Iaintliein has done a good job at using B/W to it's strengths, which is stripping an image of the extraneous information allowing one to focus on the image composition and it's subject. One tends to notice more elements in an image when produced in B/W, such as an Ansel Adams. Side by side next to a color rendition, the B/W is just stunning.