New Pet Peeve

[Cpalmson]

I've got a new pet peeve of mine for when visiting a provider's web site. A lot of these sites are essentially "cookie cutter" in design. Most have menus that have a gallery, rate information, contact information and services provided information. That's all great and actually user friendly. However, my pet peeve is when it comes to "Services Provided". Now some providers just go down the list with specifics on what they offer. I love that. It lets me know pretty much what to expect even though we all know YMMV is a factor on any date with any provider. My problem is when a provider lists as services provided the following: 5 Star Level Escort or A Level Escort. First, those aren't services provided; those are descriptions. Second, those terms are so subjective that is is laughable. Who determines what a 5 Star Level Escort is? I know that I have a certain definition and it probably is wildly different than another's. Just my little rant for the day.

[funnyboy]

I agree. The same with PSE. I know my definition is different than others.

[ForumPoster]

Most of those sites are hosted in the countries where these services are legal. Problem with ladies using them here in USA is more of legal issue rather than using descriptions as services

Lina

[Fast Gunn]

Personally, I have found that if you're going to have a pet, you should go for a cat or a dog or something similar.

I have found that peeves make terrible pets!

Regular pets may piss on your carpet, but peeves will eat your brain!

[pyramider]

It does not matter. If she states that she performs ________ that does not mean she will perform said act with you.

[Bliss]

It's funny you should mention this, because this week I removed the detailed services menu from my site. I think it adds some added protection on my side. I also don't use the term g.f.e. or p.s.e. anymore. I understand the dilemma of the hobbiest who wants to make sure they are getting the services they expect for their money. But, understand that we have to protect ourselves too. I am relying on my reviews to do the talking.

Pyramider is right, it's a crapshoot every time. There are providers that have a list a mile long of services they have no intention of providing. It's best to do your research and go by reputation, reviews, and your gut, I guess.

[Cpalmson]

Originally Posted by Bliss

It's funny you should mention this, because this week I removed the detailed services menu from my site. I think it adds some added protection on my side. I also don't use the term g.f.e. or p.s.e. anymore. I understand the dilemma of the hobbiest who wants to make sure they are getting the services they expect for their money. But, understand that we have to protect ourselves too. I am relying on my reviews to do the talking.

Pyramider is right, it's a crapshoot every time. There are providers that have a list a mile long of services they have no intention of providing. It's best to do your research and go by reputation, reviews, and your gut, I guess.

I'd prefer a provider not to list services provided vs lame generic terms. I can also understand why provider would not list specifics, but please don't try to obfuscate one's services with lame descriptions or terminology. Bliss does bring up a good point in that a history of reviews is a much better indicator of services provided than what is on a providers web site, and as I mentioned every date is a YMMV situation. What got me going are websites of providers with limited or no reviews. Some do a laundry list of services/acts provided while others are as ambiguous as possible. Since I'm not much into TOFTT, I want to know as much about a provider before contacting her.

[charlestudor2005]

Originally Posted by Bliss

It's funny you should mention this, because this week I removed the detailed services menu from my site. I think it adds some added protection on my side. I also don't use the term g.f.e. or p.s.e. anymore. I understand the dilemma of the hobbiest who wants to make sure they are getting the services they expect for their money. But, understand that we have to protect ourselves too. I am relying on my reviews to do the talking.

Pyramider is right, it's a crapshoot every time. There are providers that have a list a mile long of services they have no intention of providing. It's best to do your research and go by reputation, reviews, and your gut, I guess.

Yeah, I'm always a little concerned that I'll get BCD with provider, she'll take the envelope, and say, "But my website clearly says I don't perform sexual acts." That's a problem.

There's also the matter of the really HDHs. Since they are rarely reviewed, if at all, it is hard to tell what detailed services they provide. What if you're looking for "x" and she only provides "y?" It's a mismatch from the git-go.

Originally Posted by Cpalmson

I'd prefer a provider not to list services provided vs lame generic terms. I can also understand why provider would not list specifics, but please don't try to obfuscate one's services with lame descriptions or terminology. Bliss does bring up a good point in that a history of reviews is a much better indicator of services provided than what is on a providers web site, and as I mentioned every date is a YMMV situation. What got me going are websites of providers with limited or no reviews. Some do a laundry list of services/acts provided while others are as ambiguous as possible. Since I'm not much into TOFTT, I want to know as much about a provider before contacting her.

Nah, I'd prefer lame generic terms over no description at all. Bottom line: I'd have to have some general idea of the services offered in order to part with my hard-earned $$$.

[Dallasguy]

Originally Posted by Fast Gunn

Personally, I have found that if you're going to have a pet, you should go for a cat or a dog or something similar.

I have found that peeves make terrible pets!

Regular pets may piss on your carpet, but peeves will eat your brain!

Good one!!!

[gimme_that]

Originally Posted by Cpalmson

I'd prefer a provider not to list services provided vs lame generic terms.........Bliss does bring up a good point in that a history of reviews is a much better indicator of services provided than what is on a providers web site,.........What got me going are websites of providers with limited or no reviews. Some do a laundry list of services/acts provided while others are as ambiguous as possible. Since I'm not much into TOFTT, I want to know as much about a provider before contacting her.

I whole heartedly agree with you. I love seeing a full p411 (w services) profile with review links that include those services. I'm not always afforded time to research a lady review by review for my "must have" activities.

Usually I'll ask about things I couldnt find and ask about ymmv preferences beforehand as my money may vary in those situations.

Is their any evidence or stories of a provider getting extra time or higher fines in jail for having services on her page or reviews?

[Ravenxoxo]

Originally Posted by Cpalmson

5 Star Level Escort or A Level Escort. First, those aren't services provided; those are descriptions. Second, those terms are so subjective that is is laughable. Who determines what a 5 Star Level Escort is? I know that I have a certain definition and it probably is wildly different than another's. Just my little rant for the day.

Funny, thats my line... Five Star....I personally think the choice words you use to describe yourself are really important! If a provider says "you'll have a fine time" does that define her to the extra value menu or would you consider that five stars? If your choosing your dessert off a menu in the drive thru it says chocolate cake where as a menu at a five star restuarant would be more descriptive. You get what you pay for is not always the case, but more likely than not a carefully thought out descriptive ad rather than a few words... the thirty minutes you purchase is different than the ninety minutes the reviewer of your choice posted.

If that makes any sense to anyone besides me.....

if a provider takes the time to write a very descriptive ad doesn't mean she knows how to make those words come to life in the real scheme of things......You may find the raunchier the better....just because she says she is.... doesn't mean she is the cumshot in the face type of girl....just means she took more time to market herself to those clients, who the descriptive words make the difference in their choice of provider.

Five star is in the eye of the beholder....I just liked the idea versus no stars...and it sounds better than two thumbs up! LMAO!

Have Fun, Hope Lee

[rdigger]

You look like five stars to me Hope!!!

[pyramider]

Who issues these stars? Does Michelen rate providers like they do restaurants?

[Cpalmson]

Originally Posted by Hope Lee

Funny, thats my line... Five Star....I personally think the choice words you use to describe yourself are really important! If a provider says "you'll have a fine time" does that define her to the extra value menu or would you consider that five stars? If your choosing your dessert off a menu in the drive thru it says chocolate cake where as a menu at a five star restuarant would be more descriptive. You get what you pay for is not always the case, but more likely than not a carefully thought out descriptive ad rather than a few words... the thirty minutes you purchase is different than the ninety minutes the reviewer of your choice posted.

If that makes any sense to anyone besides me.....

if a provider takes the time to write a very descriptive ad doesn't mean she knows how to make those words come to life in the real scheme of things......You may find the raunchier the better....just because she says she is.... doesn't mean she is the cumshot in the face type of girl....just means she took more time to market herself to those clients, who the descriptive words make the difference in their choice of provider.

Five star is in the eye of the beholder....I just liked the idea versus no stars...and it sounds better than two thumbs up! LMAO!

Have Fun, Hope Lee

My point is not about how raunchy a provider is willing to be (or says she can be). My point is that some providers (not implying you specifically) will use subjective terms to describe their services. Then when a client sees the provider and is disappointed, the provider's retort to any bad review would simply be "I offered 5 Star Level of Service". When I see a provider ad that lists acronym soup like CG, RCG, BBBJ, MSOG; I have a pretty good idea of what this provider offers. On the other hand, when I see 5 Star Level of A Level Escort, I have no clue, and it has nothing to do with raunch or willingness to allow a client to cum on her face.

Originally Posted by pyramider

Who issues these stars? Does Michelen rate providers like they do restaurants?

My point exactly!

[Ravenxoxo]

Thanks rdigger!