Impulsive CLient, John_Tx. Dangerous!

[Beagle]

Originally Posted by Rand Al'Thor

I think those details are unlikely to come to light, there's not much the two parties agree on.

I have another reliable source of information. All I need to know is when the appointment between John_TX and Roxanne on Demand took place. Can either one of you step up to the plate and tell us?

[maxieryan]

And I am SUPER LATE to THIS party! Doh! the popcorn is done!

whoa!Big fella!!!!!!(John_tx) Only her side of the story goes in Girl-Talk......while only HIS side of the story goes in Men's Locker Room........Let us alllllllll remember children; everyone has a bad day, we are none of us immune to it.

So I feel it might be safe to cool off, maybe say 'no harm, no foul' and, if you must post (which is your right/ male and female to blow off some steam), just remember that keeping our comments mild means less chance we will look foolish in the future. And remember, nothing said in private on here is truly.............private. Don't put anything in writing that you may regret later.

Look for the good in all things when possible. Just my Little 2 cents......

[harkontume]

How do i get some of that payola?
I want some Quid Pro Quo!
I CAN be bought!

Help me Help You!

[Sir Hardin Thicke]

6 pages and counting...

[Guest092810]

Originally Posted by harkontume

How do i get some of that payola?
I want some Quid Pro Quo!
I CAN be bought!

Help me Help You!

Yes... The Quan. Show me the Quan.

[Rand Al'Thor]

Not since Sweet Heather, have I seen someone so thoroughly discredit themselves by showing their lack of objectivity, inability for reasoned thought, ability to alienate everyone by playing the victim, and wildly throwing insults and accusations about when thing don't go their way.

Roxxanne did the best thing possible by letting this thread play itself out, John_TX has done all the work of making sure this thread stays on the front page as long as possible so that the entire board is aware of this thread, and he's done a great job of propping up her warning by displaying traits she is warning about.

Now, if I could get both John_TX and Sweet Heather in one thread... That would be truly popcorn, Whoppers, Red Hots, and theater nacho worthy.

[Carl]

Originally Posted by John_TX

per "advice" of a mod i am going to stop posting on here. i understand that many have piled on me, not just about this, but about many other issues as well.

it is my opinion that if you simply let people dogpile on you and don't stand up to the false accusations, etc., then you are simply allowing people to say whatever they want about you. hobby rep or real-life rep, it is all important.

i think it is interesting, that the title of this thread has the description of the word "dangerous" when there is nothing in these 3 pages that remotely suggests that i am "dangerous." and the "impulsive" is also unwarranted as it is untrue with no evidence to back it.

anyway, i will be taking a vacation from this thread. feel free to talk more trash about me on here while im gone.

[MsPrittiKitti]

Originally Posted by John_TX

...
and i wasn't pushy on the phone. we agreed to her standard advertised services that I will gladly post for everyone to see that she is making that whole thing up. if I was so pushy and you felt uncomfortable why didn't you simply cancel? also i was not pushy when i got there. your clothes never came off and i gave you a hello kiss which you reciprocated. even when i got there i told you what we had agreed to which is all the services clearly spelled out on your ad. you not only agreed to these on text message but also verbally in the room. ...

i hope NO provider(s) discuss services/donation upon meeting a gent.
this is a recipe for disaster. i dont know why she cancelled the session, but if it were me, as soon as i "realized" that i had just made a HUGE mistake as discussing services, i would have cancelled also. however, from the LE post ive read, it seems as all they need is any "intent" on your part to commit a crime.

anywho. if some good comes out of this, i hope roxxanne learns to never make this mistake again.
maybe she should count her lucky stars that all she had to post about is a horrible meeting, VS. how she ended up with a wrap sheet.

good luck to you girlie!!
stay safe out there!!!

[78704]

Originally Posted by Rand Al'Thor

Now, if I could get both John_TX and Sweet Heather in one thread... That would be truly popcorn, Whoppers, Red Hots, and theater nacho worthy.

You, sir, are a freaking evil genius. I bid $20 if you can pull that off.

[Codybeast]

The thread that just won't die.

[Rand Al'Thor]

Originally Posted by 78704

You, sir, are a freaking evil genius. I bid $20 if you can pull that off.

I might collect.

[Sensual Sophia]

LUV LUV LUV this thread. Haven't read a thread in a while. Nice to see some hilarity ensue.

[Beagle]

I'll just throw this out. I communicated with a client who saw ROD on the same day. He saw her from 11:45-1:15pm. It was the last appointment at that hotel for her before switching to the next hotel (as informed by the client).

I questioned ROD and found out that ROD's appointment with John was 3pm that same day at another hotel. ROD's account of it was she went for lunch and then got settled in a little past 2pm to prepare for John's appointment.

I'm not convinced there's still a controversy here. This shows that John was most likely the first client at that new location. Only way ROD's accusation of John can still be false is if:
1) ROD did meet a client some time between 1:30-3pm, and whoever that client was, alerted the hotel or that the hotel found out something was going on in that time period.
2) ROD fabricated the whole story about hotel manager calling her up.