I agree! I had close to 100 reviews under another handle between 2001 and 2008. Haven't asked for any of them ... and some of them were pretty entertaining, so they say.
I don't have a clue how relevant they'd be any more. Surely the spate of archived reviews are well done, but they get in the way of new reviews of current providers.
What you suggest is a fabulous idea.
That being said, it seems as though the "fresh start" concept of ECCIE maybe ought to be re-examined by ownership. I wouldn't mind free premium membership for past contributions, but I quit contributing 2 years ago. Don't hobby enough now to qualify... at least not like I used to.
How does that figure into the equation?