CLIENT REVIEW suggestion box

[fd150]

It would be nice for us female & male providers to do CLIENT reviews so we have an idea about the type of person we could possible be dealing with in the future...
FAIR IS FAIR...we get graded and reviewed and it would help out if we knew ahead of time the types of things that client is into , their personality traits, build and description, if they prefer in-call or out, if they are difficult to deal with, if they are out spoken, shy, and etc etc etc...
NOT ONLY THAT, IT KEEPS US ALL SAFE.............
lets work on this ........
THANKS EVERYONE...

[Tiffany Cums]

I disagree.

We already have implemented ways of keeping the providers safe by doing some homework and screening. I think that is all we need to know. Having correspondence with them personally to find out if there are any requests and what they like gives you a re-pore with them before you meet, which only adds to the sexual build up.

They are paying for us, and for that reason they should know what they are spending their hard earned money on. It should be a great experience for them. We are not paying, but rather we are the merchandise...we don't need to know anything other then they are safe and what they tell us themselves. We should be on our top game regardless. IMHO That's what defines a good provider.

[bluffcityguy]

As I see it, there are such things as "client reviews". They're called "references". They just tend to be passed along backchannel instead of being collected on websites.

Cheers,

bcg

[Pflugerbill]

fd150,

Start your own website for client reviews. Eccie and dozens of others started from scratch.

B

[Lust at first Sight]

I kind of like the idea as I am curious as to what providers think about me after I leave.. And it could for us in our favor as clients bc I know some hobbyists don't have P411/DC and only see providers 2-3 times per year. This rules out recent references and site verifications.. So i like the idea as it could save the less active hobbyists the hassel of job verification and what not if they have collect a few review from famous verified providers over the years.

[Cpalmson]

Maybe provide a "Client" Showcase. Escorts.com allows clients to provide an interview so providers can read up on future clients. Honesty would obviously play a key role in any system. I, do though, doubt a provider is going to write a review on a client. Remember most clients see only 1 provider a day. Whereas a provider may see multiple clients a day. How is she suppose to be objective and keep clients separated in terms of reviews.

[Lust at first Sight]

Originally Posted by Cpalmson

Maybe provide a "Client" Showcase. Escorts.com allows clients to provide an interview so providers can read up on future clients. Honesty would obviously play a key role in any system. I, do though, doubt a provider is going to write a review on a client. Remember most clients see only 1 provider a day. Whereas a provider may see multiple clients a day. How is she suppose to be objective and keep clients separated in terms of reviews.

Great point on the mult clients/day. Never crossed my mind but a really good point.. But I don't write reviews for all of my providers and I'm sure noone else does either. So I don't expect the provider to write a review for all clients they encounter.

On another note, TER has something similar to escorts.com also in their Whitelist - similiar to the "verified provider" status here but instead a famous/verified provider vouches for the client that he isnt LE, rude, and whatever else.

[gimme_that]

Originally Posted by bluffcityguy

As I see it, there are such things as "client reviews". They're called "references". They just tend to be passed along backchannel instead of being collected on websites.

Cheers,

bcg

I agree with this. All the hard to reach questions you dont feel comfortable asking the client yourself should be asked to the reference.That what they are there for backchannel. On the flip side you wont believe the degree of info I will get backchannel from hobbyist about ladies. So it works, I figured all ladies were doing this to some degree.

But even when ladies get references, everyones interpretation of a client is somewhat subjective and up in the air. What one provider likes may pale in comparison to what another likes.

Also since Im not a provider and instead a discreet hobbyist getting reviewed is not what Im looking for...after all I paid you. Its seems like a double standard but it is not.

[looiecypher]

The providers get reviewed because they get "paid" for a service.
The clients do not.Therefore the clients should not be reviewed.There are already plenty of resources available for the ladies to check references on the gents.Including alerts sections ,etc for the dangerous or really bad customers.
This option has been rehashed many times and it always comes out as a bad idea.
Call it pride or whatever you like clients would be very hestiant to see providers if they are going to be "reviewed" for their performance ,appearance,etc.
Pay me then you can review me.

[gimme_that]

I can just see it now... client showcases with guys draping snuggies over their bellies for that more thinner look. Is this really what we want lol.

[bluffcityguy]

Originally Posted by TheAlphaMale

I kind of like the idea as I am curious as to what providers think about me after I leave.. And it could for us in our favor as clients bc I know some hobbyists don't have P411/DC and only see providers 2-3 times per year. This rules out recent references and site verifications.. So i like the idea as it could save the less active hobbyists the hassel of job verification and what not if they have collect a few review from famous verified providers over the years.

What you're describing is basically Date-Check/Preferred 411/RoomService 2000.

Why should some providers go to the time/expense/labor of creating such a site when three such sites exist already?

Cheers,

bcg

[bluffcityguy]

Originally Posted by looiecypher

Call it pride or whatever you like clients would be very hestiant to see providers if they are going to be "reviewed" for their performance ,appearance,etc.
Pay me then you can review me.

Damn straight.

I'm supposed to pay $250-300 per hour for a provider to then have her turn around and tell the world what a lousy lay I am?

I got that from my ex-wife for free, thankyewverrahmuch!

Cheers,

bcg

[fd150]

The reason I am suggesting this is sometimes its tooo time consuming and interruptive on a short notice to get ahold of a provider if the CLIENT has referred someone that is out of town, cant be reached, is tooo busy and not able to return calls...As I have said in the past...anyone can write a fake review on a girl with escorts dot kom. But it saves time when we can pull up some info on a potential client with the notes someone has wrote from here...I TRUST THIS SITE BUT IN QUESTION ABOUT SOME OF THE OTHERS....sometimes it makes things faster and more effective ... I know several female providers and it would be great since they have been in this business alot longer than I that could write some notes down and being able to review if I CANT REACH THEM...

[looiecypher]

well fd150 it may be a little tougher for you to find the info but after all that is part of your job. I'm just saying reviews posted publicly of clients will never work. Most guys want the info kept confidential.Without the clients you have no business so making them happy should be your first priority. posting reviews would not please them so therefore would hurt not help you in your endeavors..
The ladies lounge can serve the purposes you speak of.

[ANONONE]

Originally Posted by bluffcityguy

Damn straight.

I'm supposed to pay $250-300 per hour for a provider to then have her turn around and tell the world what a lousy lay I am?

I got that from my ex-wife for free, thankyewverrahmuch!

Cheers,

bcg

Yeah, but I am just a bit curious if an am as awesome a lay as I think I am.



Bring it on!

Seriously it would be fun to read it in COED discussions. I volunteer for the pilot project if this penguin ever jumps up and flies.