There is a good reason why . . .

[GP]

[chloegiggles]

Telly Savalas is best remembered as TV's Kojak. The show ran from 1973-78; Kojak was a loose and tough-talking New York police detective known for his shiny bald head, lollipops, and signature line, "Who loves ya', baby?"

[Wakeup]

Originally Posted by Doove

And please explain how what she did is any different than what you are doing by confirming that her comments are accurate about what was posted.

Dove, this is the second time you've asked me for this explanation. Did my ignoring it the first time you asked for it somehow confuse you? I didn't ignore it because I didn't see it, I ignored it because the question itself is ignorant. It seems I'm forced to explain the obvious simply so certain people can feel better about the world...

I asked the OP a very specific question in that other thread.

Originally Posted by Wakeup

Hey Chloe, what private areas were these pictures of you supposedly posted in?

I'm sure you missed it, so I'll explain the subtleties of this one sentence. I used the words "private areas", which could mean a PM, PRIVATE tags, e-mail, or even texts...not just non-public forums. I didn't speculate or confirm that they were posted in any particular place. Second, I used the word "supposedly", I used it simply because I have no knowledge of whether or not they were even posted, all I'm going on is the OPs information, and as part of that, even IF they were posted, I have no idea if the place was private or not. I wanted confirmation from the OP before I answered. The OP answered my question very specifically.

Originally Posted by chloegiggles

Mens lounge and spiderhole...If the question of how i found out or who leaked it to me is the first thing on you mind you need to question your twisted motivations, the fact is that it was done, many of you encouarged it and the moderators let it happen.

The OP has now done several things. One, she has said again that the pictures were posted somewhere, so she's confirmed to me that she has information from someone that they were in fact posted in forums. Two, she's mentioned very specific forums on this board, which helps to confirm in my mind that she's in fact telling the truth. If she had no idea exactly where they were posted, I'd believe that she was lying and wouldn't have followed up in any way. Three, she's mentioned two forums where she admits she doesn't have access. In the Men's Lounge it's obvious that she doesnt have access, but she also says that the information was "leaked" to her, admitting that she doesn't have access to the Spider Hole as well. I have no idea if she's a member there or not, but she seems to think she isn't. Four, she admits that the information was given to her by another person who does have access to those forums in some way (much longer discussion).

My follow up discussions were in no way confirming that the pictures were in fact posted in either/both of those private forums. My follow up discussions were just assuming that the OP wasn't lying when she asserted that the information was "leaked" to her from a "private forum". I have absolutely no firsthand knowledge of the truth of her claims to offer you here. Again, I'm simply trusting the OP to be telling the truth. If you would like for me to assume that the OP is a lying sack of shit who makes up drama filled alerts about being outed, then I can certainly do so, but I doubt Chloe would appreciate that, and I honestly don't believe it.

Does that answer your question?


P.S.-I'm not responsible for other posters here on the board. If there was in fact information leaked from either of those forums here in the public arena, rest assured that those people will be dealt with as well.

P.P.S.-Don't take the lack of Chloe being banned as me being "full of shit". The mods don't ban anyone on a whim, but we've all seen this happen before, and it always follows the same script. Chloe realizes what has happened, and while her frustration is indeed understandable, she has to suffer the consequences of her actions just like anyone else. The mods, even while they're discussing this, realize that the ends don't justify the means. I believe she's fine with taking her punishment now that it has been explained to her, and I seriously doubt she'll make the same mistake again.

[Lexxxy]

Didn't Michigan boards get successfully sued(by providers), investigated(due to court findings), raided, and shut down for the same exact thing before and even some a few months ago? I'm pretty sure that other things were found out during the investigations which turned it into an FBI thing.
ScorpsUSA, EscortVault, and AESource all got raided by the FBI and shut down.

[Guest121613]

do i add another post, but need to stop the feeding frenzy

[chloegiggles]

So how about some common sense, like don't allow stuff here that might make someone mad enough to draw serious attention to it. And again Wake up all that is jibber jabber, the OP outed to me that he posted that stuff . . . .

Nobody answered anything here . . . my photos were outed and who cares WHO told on that!!

And who cares WHO posted it, all of you who are members saw it and fed into it for months now!!!

I deserve the torcher, I was meant to be robbed today . . ..who had the bright idea of the creepy kitty photo?? This is sick.

[chloegiggles]

Originally Posted by Lexxxy

Didn't Michigan boards get successfully sued(by providers), investigated(due to court findings), raided, and shut down for the same exact thing before and even some a few months ago? I'm pretty sure that other things were found out during the investigations which turned it into an FBI thing.
ScorpsUSA, EscortVault, and AESource all got raided by the FBI and shut down.

Smart lady. These guys have no clue what kind of fuel they feed to this fire. Not many people stand by and allow themselves to be robbed, mocked, outed, and bullied.

[Doove]

Originally Posted by Wakeuр

Dove, this is the second time you've asked me for this explanation. Did my ignoring it the first time you asked for it somehow confuse you? I didn't ignore it because I didn't see it, I ignored it because the question itself is ignorant. It seems I'm forced to explain the obvious simply so certain people can feel better about the world...

It's not the only question you've ignored, but it seems the only one you're willing to answer. My guess is it's because you seem to think you can plausibly (or not) lie your way through it.

I asked the OP a very specific question in that other thread.

Yes you did.

Second, I used the word "supposedly", I used it simply because I have no knowledge of whether or not they were even posted,

all I'm going on is the OPs information, and as part of that, even IF they were posted, I have no idea if the place was private or not. I wanted confirmation from the OP before I answered. The OP answered my question very specifically.

Pretty clever set up. You seem uncharacteristically interested in what goes on in the UNY forums relative to this singular issue. One might suspect you became interested in an UNY posting because you caught wind of Chloe talking about something that happened, and you knew it happened in the spider hole.

Plead ignorance all you want, you ain't fooling anybody.

But since you wish to play your little rhetorical word games, then let's.

The OP has now done several things. One, she has said again that the pictures were posted somewhere,

Yeah, so? I'll say it too. Someone posted pictures of Chloe in one or more of the private lounges. Should i now be banned?

so she's confirmed to me that she has information from someone that they were in fact posted in forums.

No she didn't. What she did was simply confirm that she knew they were posted. What's the difference, you say? Ahhh, well here's the rub...

In the Men's Lounge it's obvious that she doesnt have access, but she also says that the information was "leaked" to her,

Oh? That's how you read it, is it?

Four, she admits that the information was given to her by another person who does have access to those forums in some way (much longer discussion).

Yeah......but....... Here's what she, in fact, said:

"Mens lounge and spiderhole. I will never understand how anyone had fun mocking the photos of my knocked unconscious body and cuts on my face from a traumatic experience. It is sick and disturbing how low some of you get here.

If the question of how i found out or who leaked it to me is the first thing on you mind you need to question your twisted motivations, the fact is that it was done, many of you encouarged it and the moderators let it happen.
I notified 4 moderators a while ago about a picture and nothing was done. Now that i made this public they are finally taking care of it."

At no point did she ever say that the info was leaked to her. If you're relying on her saying "...the fact is that it was done...", what she's actually referring to is the posting of the pictures. That, and at no point did she ever say that she obtained the info on her own.

Rest assured, there are ways of finding out things that occur (or, key point, will occur) in the private forums without someone reading it themselves, or, more importantly in this case, without it being leaked information. Ways that are far more plausible than your "i just asked out of curiosity" nonsense you want us to believe.

A perfect example, someone who has it in for Chloe tells her in an email that out of some twisted sense of spite, he is going to post pictures of her in the ML and in the SH. So what we have is, she knows there are going to be pictures, but she found out about it before the pictures were actually posted. Hence, no leak. Gossip, perhaps, but no leak.

Like i said, you wanna rely on rhetorical slight of hand....

My follow up discussions were in no way confirming that the pictures were in fact posted in either/both of those private forums.

And i think they were, but you're free to read it differently.

My follow up discussions were just assuming that the OP wasn't lying when she asserted that the information was "leaked" to her from a "private forum". I have absolutely no firsthand knowledge of the truth of her claims to offer you here.

Uh huh.

You have no firsthand knowledge of the truth of her claims "to offer me here".

Does that answer your question?

Yes, you've, ahem, answered my question.

One of them, at least.

By the way, which subforum rule are you relying on here? Exactly?

P.S.-I'm not responsible for other posters here on the board.

Ah, but you are responsible for Chloe?

P.P.S.-Don't take the lack of Chloe being banned as me being "full of shit".

Maybe i will.....maybe i won't.

I believe she's fine with taking her punishment now that it has been explained to her, and I seriously doubt she'll make the same mistake again.

Yeah, next time she'll just need to be more careful in how she words things. Kinda like you.

[Wakeup]

I like you Dove, instead of just taking "my photos were posted in the men's lounge and the spider hole" at face value, you're chalking this all up to a conspiracy to get Chloe banned by tricking her into saying these things in a public forum about a fake set of pictures that were never posted...gotta hand it to you...there's no arguing with crazy...

[Doove]

Originally Posted by Wakeuр

I like you Dove, instead of just taking "my photos were posted in the men's lounge and the spider hole" at face value, you're chalking this all up to a conspiracy to get Chloe banned by tricking her into saying these things in a public forum about a fake set of pictures that were never posted...gotta hand it to you...there's no arguing with crazy...

Sorry, but....no.

My main argument is that Chloe did nothing that should get her banned, even if what you say is true. The question you were willing to answer only addressed my secondary argument. So i think you're confusing the term "conspiracy" with the term "idiocy".

Anyways, about that rule you're relying on, by the way....where is it? Please don't make me have to track it down and post it again. That would so suck.

And here i thought you were supposed to be a chess player.

[GP]

[Guest042416]

too much drama no good, lets get back to good topics close this thread.

[chloegiggles]

Originally Posted by Wakeuр

I like you Dove, instead of just taking "my photos were posted in the men's lounge and the spider hole" at face value, you're chalking this all up to a conspiracy to get Chloe banned by tricking her into saying these things in a public forum about a fake set of pictures that were never posted...gotta hand it to you...there's no arguing with crazy...

Wow you are really grasping at straws man. . . .. who the hey is this random guy doing some serious posting from Houston and accusations of banning here? You are all proving me right . . . keep going . . . .

[elghund]

Originally Posted by Doove

Sorry, but....no.

My main argument is that Chloe did nothing that should get her banned, even if what you say is true. The question you were willing to answer only addressed my secondary argument. So i think you're confusing the term "conspiracy" with the term "idiocy".

Anyways, about that rule you're relying on, by the way....where is it? Please don't make me have to track it down and post it again. That would so suck.

And here i thought you were supposed to be a chess player.

Got you ahead on points in this boxing match, Doove!!!

[Wakeup]

Originally Posted by Doove

My main argument is that Chloe did nothing that should get her banned...

See...lost me right off the bat there...sorry...was there something else you said?