Would you rather have a Mistress or just see a provider?

[pickupkid]

Provider or An affair?

pros: provider 1 or 2 hour contract

Misstress 3 or 4 hours


housing: short term with provider

apt. monthtly rent with misstress

fee Provider hourly


mistress monthly allowance


who would you choose?

[CummingsLane]

IMHO with a provider you know what you are getting. Sexual romance with no strings attached. With a mistress well ....you just never know my .02cents

[jaydalee]

With a provider it is a short affair of mutual interests without the strings.
Don't have to worry about paying an allowance pay the provider's rate have fun and less complicated.With a mistress there might be a chance of her getting too attached which can cause problems later.Go with a provider very fulfilling and less stressful!

[i'va biggen]

Tried the SB deal it sucked went to providers and it is better.

[Shayla]

Depends. If the mistress if going to keep it NSA and mutually have fun - I'd go with the mistress. A mistress generally won't charge you to have dinner or just "hang out". Will save you money in the end.
Providers aren't always a sure deal, anyway. Look at all bad reviews and bitching that goes on. IJS.

[AdventureAdams]

To conclude which situation would be easier would be solely based on which person you decided to enter into extra-marital/P4P relationship with.

As long as you are fortunate enough to pick up a chick who isn't crazy, closed minded, or too greedy you should be good no matter which one you choose.

[Shayla]

Originally Posted by SkylarCruzWantsYou

To conclude which situation would be easier would be solely based on which person you decided to enter into extra-marital/P4P relationship with.

As long as you are fortunate enough to pick up a chick who isn't crazy, closed minded, or too greedy you should be good no matter which one you choose.

Wow, that eliminates 95% of women.

[AdventureAdams]

Originally Posted by Shayla

Wow, that eliminates 95% of women.

You are right! Maybe that's why my 'Keep your mouth shut and fix me a sammich, woman!' package is doing so well.

[Naomi4u]

What a question. *sigh* really? Ever heard the saying you pay them to leave? Um that's why men prefer escorts. Smh.

[pickupkid]

Well there are pros to having a mistress.... company for dinner, a one woman man.sex when ever you want it.

[Still Looking]

YES!

[awl4knot]

Originally Posted by pickupkid

Well there are pros to having a msstress.... company for dinner, a one woman man.sex when ever you want it.

You are mixing up your terms. Having an affair is different than having a mistress/sugarbabe. Having a mistress/sugarbabe is different than seeing a provider.

Your list of benefits is suspect. Maybe you can't afford to be seen in public with your mistress so you are forced to eat in the home that you are paying for. Who says she will cook?

Also, do seriously think that a mistress would be faithful to you? That seems like a pipe dream. She should be shopping for a better deal since this one will end sooner rather than later.

And sex whenever you want it? Another pipe dream.

[pickupkid]

Corrected Misstress or provider?And if she is serving more than one man ...its goodbye.No Sex ..no rent.

[Tracey P]

I think one area where men find trouble/dissapointment with a provider is when they attempt to have a mistress type arrangement with her-- while she's still an active provider. Ive tried it and I couldn't do both at the same time. The "main-guy" wants a lot of your time and attention but so do the clients. So the provider winds up being pulled in too many different directions and can't give the main guy what he is looking for.

So my advice to guys who meet a provider and want her as your mistress, is to pull her completely off the market. Its a major financial committment but I think thats the only way for it to work out.

Or better yet, just don't try it with a provider at all

[pickupkid]

I agree if I'm paying the rent and her allowence...I don't want her seeing other men.A misstress can not serve 2 men.