Quote:
Originally Posted by ddf69
I think I understand what you are saying ---
If a guy has a bad experience, will that influence his description of the girl in a negative way. (and vice versa)
I can see where a guy might have a bad date and then tends to be negative on his description. But I've seen tons of bad reviews where there was nothing but a positive description.
In general, I think guys can separate the physical appearance of a girl from the sexual experience.
The problems will arise when the girl does not match her pics anymore!
|
well said!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba3452
Everyone has some flaws. If the session is otherwise great, those flaws become less important and may even be overlooked entirly. And the reverse is, of course, true as well. Also, since WALDT, what are saggy boobs to one guy who really likes MM boobs, may be perfect naturals to a different guy.
I have has a couple of less than outstanding sessions, but the reasons had nothing to do with her body so I dont think the results affected my ability to objectivily describe her body.
|
ditto!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Daddy Moose
Experience always affects the description.
|
not always. it's like "is it nature or nurture that forms us?"
i'd have to go back and read all my reviews to give a definitive answer about my writings styles, but i tend to write descriptions independently of ROS and recommendation. true, service results & recommendation
can affect the descriptions but
not always.
i can think of one woman w/ generally positive reviews [on aspd]. attractive face, well styled hair, toned body, implants that were too large for my tastes [but nicely done], pretty genitals. but her service, at least for me, was less than deliteful, partly her attitude, partly her repetoire.
and another woman w/ generally positive reviews [on here]. an attractive face, well styled hair, natural breasts and pretty genitals, but flabby body w/ a very pouchy stomach [worse than mine]. in that case, i described her as that. for me, at least, her service was less than deliteful.
and another woman w/ generally positive reviews [on aspd]. to me, her face was so plain, not ugly, just plain and not stimulating/enticing at all. nice body, breasts, genitals. very plain service, essentially bbbj w/ hj completion and NO attempt to strike up for round 2.
in all three cases, i described her as i saw her. and reported on her services as i experienced them. i dont think i embellished one cos of the other.
and there are women who i've consulted with who are excellent in the services dept, good to great bodies, breasts, and genitals. some have gorgemous faces, some attractive faces, one reminded me of Zelda Gilroy from the Dobie Gillis show. again, i reported as i saw and experienced.
but, it prolly does happen - good or bad service influences description.
for me, that's why just a "yes" or a "no" recommendation is not enough for me to think about contacting a woman for a consultation. i need to read between the lines, read the ROS, read other reviews of her, read other reviews by the guy, and perhaps message/chat/talk w/ others to get the scoop before i decide to contact her.
rarely have i contacted a woman just on her ads or pics. i believe in informed decisions [now, as to whether i have the correct info is another question].