Encounter: Lona at Just Relax is Just Ok

[Manma]

User ID: -
Date: 02/20/2025
Name: Lona
Phone: (737) 297-8565
Email Address: -
URL / Website: Just Relax
City: Austin
State: Texas
Address: 4327 #106 South First St.
Activities: BBBJ, HJ, Ball Licking
Hair Length and Color: Black, Past Shoulders
Age: 50+
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: Asian
Physical Description: She is easily 50+ (guys get better at age prediction, about 5'1" and MM C cups
Recommendation: No

[Lackadaisical liger]

Yeah shes definitely in her 40s or early 50s and not pretty
. Plus while her skills are good shes greedy af and it's rather annoying.

[justhangingaround]

[tastesicles]

[justhangingaround]

[TRAUG69]

Originally Posted by tastesicles

[RadioHam]

[justhangingaround]

[GoodTyme]

Originally Posted by justhangingaround

Thank you! I will was waiting for someone else to say it first so it is not just me that repeatedly has to state what is glaringly obvious to anyone that can read. Basic Fractions taught us the term “Common Denominator”. Manma fits this definition to a TEE!!! With an almost 50% NO rate reviews even with some of the best girls in the area, yet somehow always the girls fault. Then ADD Manmas proven FAKE NEGATIVE REVIEW.

So using my basic fraction knowledge:

I will take Lona’s 99/100s positive reviews versus Manma’s 50/100 NEGATIVE reviews as my evidence that the problem is 100/100 Manma.

GT

[justhangingaround]

Originally Posted by GoodTyme

Thank you! I will was waiting for someone else to say it first so it is not just me that repeatedly has to state what is glaringly obvious to anyone that can read. Basic Fractions taught us the term “Common Denominator”. Manma fits this definition to a TEE!!! With an almost 50% NO rate reviews even with some of the best girls in the area, yet somehow always the girls fault. Then ADD Manmas proven FAKE NEGATIVE REVIEW.

So using my basic fraction knowledge:

I will take Lona’s 99/100s positive reviews versus Manma’s 50/100 NEGATIVE reviews as my evidence that the problem is 100/100 Manma.

GT

He must think that his money is worth more than the rest of ours, collectively. Obviously they don't think so.


Most of us get a great experience with the same girls that he says provided him with a poor experience. So something doesn't quite add up. Many of these girls have a proven track record of providing an exceptional experience.

[Rockyrhoade]

Originally Posted by GoodTyme

I will take Lona’s 99/100s positive reviews versus Manma’s 50/100 NEGATIVE reviews as my evidence that the problem is 100/100 Manma.

GT

How much is Manma's post is legit though? Is Lona really in her 40s/50s and Lackadaisical liger is telling the truth on her greediness?

[justhangingaround]

She’s mid 30’s to possibly early 40’s. I would guess closer to late 30’s.

She’s hasn’t shown any greediness to me but I also do not lowball or haggle. I don’t deviate from the actual market.

[Manma]

Originally Posted by justhangingaround

He must think that his money is worth more than the rest of ours, collectively. Obviously they don't think so.


Most of us get a great experience with the same girls that he says provided him with a poor experience. So something doesn't quite add up. Many of these girls have a proven track record of providing an exceptional experience.

Yes, my reviews are indeed stricter, but they are also accurate. I pride myself on predicting ages and rewards with precision, drawing from years of experience as a dedicated hobbyist. Unlike some newcomers who might prioritize pour money, I adhere to standard rates, and I believe there’s nothing wrong with that. I trust you’re not carelessly spending money that isn't yours to give away.

[justhangingaround]

Originally Posted by Manma

Yes, my reviews are indeed stricter, but they are also accurate. I pride myself on predicting ages and rewards with precision, drawing from years of experience as a dedicated hobbyist. Unlike some newcomers who might prioritize pour money, I adhere to standard rates, and I believe there’s nothing wrong with that. I trust you’re not carelessly spending money that isn't yours to give away.

My time is more valuable than the amount of my donation so I am more interested in getting an exceptional experience with the time that I have invested and have no problems rewarding those that provide it and that appreciation is often reciprocated. For those providers that I invest more of my time will prioritize seeing me over other mongers and actually accept a lower donation on a time basis than the market. For example, a two hour+ experience will end up being a 1.1-1.2 multiplier.

I don’t know what you consider the “standard rate” in 2025. If it is in line with the current market then I can understand the disappointment. The other thing to consider is if the known providers are consistently only providing you with a bad experience compared to the rest of the market then you are likely the problem. At some point you may have screwed yourself by either being known for writing bad reviews, being a lowballer and haggler or having unrealistic expectations.

[Baxter68]

Originally Posted by justhangingaround

At some point you may have screwed yourself by either being known for writing bad reviews, being a lowballer and haggler or having unrealistic expectations.

Spot on.