January 6

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile...p-and-charged/

JV Couch Fucker gave a somewhat reasonable answer

Your article tries to make it sound like Vance's view is different than Trump's. It's not.

Nice try, though.

[HDGristle]

I shared Couch Fucker's position on Jan 6th pardons and those who got violent. I called it somewhat reasonable.

You can take whatever slant u see up with whoever wrote the article. Maybe write the editor.

Do you agree his words are somewhat reasonable?

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Not sure why you seem you start from a place where America isn't great but I'll pray that one day you get your groove back.

With the Biden Dims gone in a week, I'll def be back in the groove. So will millions of your fellow Americans who (as you put it) "lost faith". That's not just a "me" thing.

[HDGristle]

Fickle faith. At least you're not trying to hang Mike Pence

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Do you agree his words are somewhat reasonable?

Of course. Do you agree Merrick Garland's DOJ went too far in charging non-violent J6 demonstrators?

[HDGristle]

Not far enough, actually. They gave too many folks sweetheart deals who should have had a library thrown at them.

They FA'd and they deserved to FO.

[lustylad]

You're contradicting yourself. Again.

If you think Vance's answer was reasonable, then you should agree some non-violent J6 demonstrators deserve pardons, not having a "library thrown at them".

[HDGristle]

Not really. Power to pardon has very little to do with innocence. They aren't. So until they're pardoned throw the book at them. Or the whole Library of Congress.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

I shared Couch Fucker's position on Jan 6th pardons and those who got violent. I called it somewhat reasonable.

Originally Posted by HDGristle

...until they're pardoned throw the book at them.

So you think it's reasonable to pardon the same people you want to throw the book at.

Got it.

[HDGristle]

I think it's reasonable for those who got violent to not expect a pardon.

I think it's less reasonable for vandals, thieves and trespassers to get pardons, but somewhat reasonable to expect one given that the the FFOTUS has the power to grant one and, is generally an apologist for those who praise him.

So not hard to see, they don't deserve a slap on the wrist or a pardon but its somewhat reasonable to expect one.

Until they have one granted? Max sentence is good for the goose and gander. They FA'd. They should FO.

[Snafu412]

Originally Posted by Chase7

Really, when has it become against the constitution to protest.
Why don’t some of you look at the videos of the police opening the doors to the capitol and showing the protesters around, the videos prove it.

J6 committee was simply lawfare purely political to prevent the people from electing who they wanted not the likes of Obama’s pick and his failed coup.

Obama and his cronies are now a laughingstock and have been shown the door.
In fact the J6 committee was the insurrectionist and treasonous.

Trump Derangement Sydrome, Fo Sho!
Here let me help you with that
There any better? Good glad I could help brother!
Yo!
Anybody else need a MAGA labotomy?

[HDGristle]

Some of the Jan 6th protestors are mad at Couch fucker for his somewhat reasonable comments.

They must have been convicted of some felonies and misdemeanors

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Of course. Do you agree Merrick Garland's DOJ went too far in charging non-violent J6 demonstrators?

Garland didn't go far enough. His futile, weak bullshit just opened the door to many future insurrections. Go ahead, try to overthrow the government, it's all good. Nothing will happen to you anyway.

Garland is a feckless cunt.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by tommy156

Garland is a feckless cunt.

I agree. He did everything Sleepy Joe told him to do, without the slightest pushback, concern about the DOJ's independence or the need to uphold the public perception that the Department was non-partisan and un-weaponized.

Too bad. The guy had a decent reputation when Obama nominated him to the SCOTUS. Now it's all tarnished.

[HDGristle]

I thought you said Sleepy Joe had no authority and wasn't making decisions