There was a review written ..

[KitKatt62]

About me calling me damaged goods (and I have no idea what the rest of it says obviously) but the date it says as us meeting I can absolutely assure did not happen because 1) I wasn't even taking incalls at the time & 2) I didn't meet with anyone incall or outcall that week.
Only writing this so that maybe mods will see it and do something about the review that is slandering me if what I heard was written in the review is true. It's pretty fucked up that someone is so pitiful and pathetic that they choose to write a review claiming someone has an STD, and not even text the person they claim it came from. Like you're fucking weird for that. But the reason you chose not to text is because it is a lie and the only reason behind the review is because you want to fuck up business for me I'm assuming. Get a fucking life weirdo.

[Bames Jond]

Sorry to hear that KitKatt. Lowest of the low when disenfranchised clients take that route. Not cool.

[Ed Highlight]

These things/issues tend to have a very short shelf-life. Very few see the post you're talking about, nobody remembers it and certainly anybody that believes the post without verifying it with you is not worth seeing. Try not to keep brining it up on-line and giving life to something that is probably already dead and forgotten.

[KitKatt62]

I absolutely agree with you, and I didn't say anything until I seen it mentioned in a review for another provider that was done recently. And I had a couple people even say something about it. It's just irritating because I know the truth and know for a fact the review is a complete lie because I didn't start doing incalls again until August of this year. I especially wasn't doing them in March when the guy claimed to have seen me. And it's not right that mods won't remove a review if it's false and can be proven false.

[405Newguy]

I like reviews to be an honest as possible. If a guy didn't like a girl for whatever reason, put it in the review, but don't make up lies. I'm not saying the reviewer made up a lie, I just think it's low if it did happen. That being said, I dont think you can put much stock in the date. Sometimes guys use an approximate date for various reasons. A visit may have happened on 11/2 but they might say 11/4 because they ran into another guy and they don't want anyone to put 2 and 2 together. So don't use the exact date as proof. If you can honestly say you weren't in a certain location within 3 or 4 days forward or backwards of the review date, then your onto something.

[KitKatt62]

I NEVER was doing an incall in Norman near the OU motel at all. That's how positive I am that the review is lies. I wasn't doing incalls at all actually.

Originally Posted by 405Newguy

I like reviews to be an honest as possible. If a guy didn't like a girl for whatever reason, put it in the review, but don't make up lies. I'm not saying the reviewer made up a lie, I just think it's low if it did happen. That being said, I dont think you can put much stock in the date. Sometimes guys use an approximate date for various reasons. A visit may have happened on 11/2 but they might say 11/4 because they ran into another guy and they don't want anyone to put 2 and 2 together. So don't use the exact date as proof. If you can honestly say you weren't in a certain location within 3 or 4 days forward or backwards of the review date, then your onto something.

[Bigverde50]

The review may have been a lie, but honestly, your rep is average at best.