The Rules
I just got more penalty points for breaking the rules.
I get that they are the rules and it is not my site and if I want to create the rules I should start my own site.
I also get that there are legal reasons for some of these rules.
And I am not complaining (probably against the rules) and only trying to be constructive.
Having said that - this site would be a lot more useful if there was more focus on providing valuable information.
Why do you even allow reviews to be posted that have nothing written in the ROS? Why keep the posts on the site if you won't give the reviewers credit.
I have multiple times seen known and trusted reviews not get credit for reviews that I thought were seriously valuable.
On the other hand we have lately seen reviews posted that have nothing posted in the ROS and seem suspicious at best.
We also have threads get shut down when someone posts valuable updates after 30 days, while other posts get meaningless bumps on day 29 and they stay open.
|
