Prediction: THis is where the fraud will come from

[InU]

Libs always blame the other side for what they are guilty of............................ ........




ALWAYS

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by InU

Libs always blame the other side for what they are guilty of............................ ........




ALWAYS

Bullshit, jesus, trumps famous for admitting what he did by accusing the other side doing it

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by farmstud60

That isn't even close to the truth. Pretty obvious over the last 50 years.

Very obvious over the last 50 years Democrats cleaning up Republican disasters. Bush 1, Bush 2, Trump... All of them total fuckups and Dems had to clean the messes up. You'd think the American people would wisen up but too many rural farmers out there being paid to do jack shit for years. Fuckin trash 100% of these farm subsidies and see who votes for who.

[farmstud60]

Originally Posted by royamcr

Very obvious over the last 50 years Democrats cleaning up Republican disasters. Bush 1, Bush 2, Trump... All of them total fuckups and Dems had to clean the messes up. You'd think the American people would wisen up but too many rural farmers out there being paid to do jack shit for years. Fuckin trash 100% of these farm subsidies and see who votes for who.

Again, you have it backasswards. Carter worst president, Clinton would have been horrible but after he couldn't the typical Democrat failed policies enacted and lost Congress in 1994, he did an about face and basically followed New Gingrich and Republican Economic policies getting the first balanced budge in a long time. But the Dumbocrats weren't the reason for it.

[hughjahol]

Pretty sure you already have to be a citizen to vote. Which makes me wonder what this bill is really for.
What else was in it that made the Dems come out against it.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by hughjahol

Pretty sure you already have to be a citizen to vote.

If only there were some simple explanation.. if only it were placed on this thread for ease of use... if only there were follow up posts explaining the issue.... I guess if there were I might put them somewhere convenient.. maybe some place like on the previous page?

Originally Posted by hughjahol

Which makes me wonder what this bill is really for. What else was in it that made the Dems come out against it.

Simple... they don't WANT it to be illegal for foreigners to vote in our election...

[hughjahol]

Originally Posted by texassapper

If only there were some simple explanation.. if only it were placed on this thread for ease of use... if only there were follow up posts explaining the issue.... I guess if there were I might put them somewhere convenient.. maybe some place like on the previous page?

If only...you could answer a simple question and spare us your superior attitude. I figured that since you started this thread that you wouldn't mind providing a little detail. Never mind. Looked it up myself, don't strain yourself. So the bill would make people provide "documentary proof" they are citizens. Even though it has been shown over and over that this isn't a problem. So that seems like a good idea to you? Make 160 million people (I looked that up too) have to put up with a bunch of political nonsense just so the GOP can make the Dems look bad when they say "NO." WTF.

Originally Posted by texassapper

Simple... they don't WANT it to be illegal for foreigners to vote in our election...

And now you know that this is what they WANT. All of the Dems. They want this. Show me that this is true. Both things. First that voting by people who aren't citizens is a real problem. Second that this is what Dems WANT. Because I don't think either one is true. You might. But I don't believe you either. YOu are just repeating nonsense from Paxton.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by texassapper

... There's THIS - 81%.

... The American voters don't like Voter Fraud.

#### Salty

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by hughjahol

If only...you could answer a simple question and spare us your superior attitude.

I'm not superior. I'm just not ignorant.

Originally Posted by hughjahol

I figured that since you started this thread that you wouldn't mind providing a little detail.

Had you have bothered to read the thread from the start you would see in the images posted the details...

Originally Posted by hughjahol

Never mind. Looked it up myself

See ignorance can be cured. Who know what you might learn next!?

Originally Posted by hughjahol

don't strain yourself.

Wasn't planning to.

Originally Posted by hughjahol

So the bill would make people provide "documentary proof" they are citizens. Even though it has been shown over and over that this isn't a problem.

Well if it's NOT a problem then this law won't negatively impact Democrats ballot harvesting operations... it should be a now brainer to vote for it.

Originally Posted by hughjahol

So that seems like a good idea to you?

Yes... and it does to 81% of the public as well. (See posts in this thread)

Originally Posted by hughjahol

Make 160 million people (I looked that up too) have to put up with a bunch of political nonsense

Why would having to prove your eligible to actually vote be non-sense? I have to prove who I am at the bank, why not to perform a CIVIC duty?

Originally Posted by hughjahol

just so the GOP can make the Dems look bad when they say "NO." WTF.

The Democrats don't HAVE to vote no on this bill. But they will... and the reason is that they NEED the fraudulent voting to stay in power...

Originally Posted by hughjahol

And now you know that this is what they WANT. All of the Dems. They want this. Show me that this is true.

I don't have to show you, they will. With their "No" vote. That's the point of having our representatives vote... they are expressing the will of their constituents. (or should be). So when a Dem say No...it should not be illegal for foreigners to vote in US elections, they are TELLING YOU what they believe.

Why is understanding how a representative Republic works so difficult for you to comprehend?

Originally Posted by hughjahol

Both things. First that voting by people who aren't citizens is a real problem.

If it's NOT a problem then this law is just a formality...

Originally Posted by hughjahol

Second that this is what Dems WANT.

Just explained it to you...

Originally Posted by hughjahol

Because I don't think either one is true.

good for you... You just explained you don't understand how voting is an expression of constituent will... Why would I care about your opinion on a matter you don't understand?

Originally Posted by hughjahol

YOu are just repeating nonsense from Paxton.

Lol... yes, this is all about Ken Paxton... again... you could bother to read the thread.

[Michael8219]

Originally Posted by royamcr

No, liberals actually research and read from multiple sources to find the real story instead of magats just posting the first sensational propaganda conspiracy bullshit they find. Probably Russian assets fucking with your brains.

Because 51 ex government “security experts” signed a letter two weeks prior saying Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation?

Documented proof of cemetery (dead people) voting for Biden last time, ballot harvesting, and mail in ballots miraculously going 97%+ for Biden.

C’mon man!

http://youtu.be/OgLD1yhxNik?si=RGql0BKGXJ4HCNOt

[hughjahol]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... There's THIS - 81%.

... The American voters don't like Voter Fraud.

#### Salty

This does not show what texassapper says it does. It shows that people support showing ID. It does not say 81 percent of people support having to prove citizenship.

[hughjahol]

Originally Posted by Michael8219

Because 51 ex government “security experts” signed a letter two weeks prior saying Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation?

They didn't say that. They warned that it might be because of language used and things like that. Here is a summary from Newsweek: ""We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not, and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement—just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case," the letter said."

[hughjahol]

I see that you love to do this. Take someones post and tear it up line by line. Wear them down.
Hope they will give up. I'm not going to fall into the same trap that others have. This is not worth spending more time on. But I am going to use your technique against you one time only.

Originally Posted by texassapper

I'm not superior. I'm just not ignorant.

You very obviously think you are superior. The whole tone of your replies to me has been like that. And I didn't say you were ignorant. But you use arguments and sources that support your views and don't consider other facts that do not.

Originally Posted by texassapper

Had you have bothered to read the thread from the start you would see in the images posted the details...

You mean the images that do not at all show what you say they do? Like the image from Pew Research that only shows people support showing ID and says nothing about supporting proving citizenship?

Originally Posted by texassapper

See ignorance can be cured. Who know what you might learn next!?

I am learning that you cannot support your arguments with actual facts. Being rude and sarcastic does not help you.

Originally Posted by texassapper

Well if it's NOT a problem then this law won't negatively impact Democrats ballot harvesting operations... it should be a now brainer to vote for it.

Not a good argument. Paxton wants to make 160 million people prove their citizenship to vote. A hassle that is not needed.

Originally Posted by texassapper

Yes... and it does to 81% of the public as well. (See posts in this thread.

Like I said above the 81 percent are people that support showing ID. Your posts do not prove the same amount support having to prove citizenship.

Originally Posted by texassapper

Why would having to prove your eligible to actually vote be non-sense? I have to prove who I am at the bank, why not to perform a CIVIC duty?

I'll say that again too. Because it is not needed. Why make 160 million people do this if it is not. The answer is because this is all just a political show to make the Dems look bad. But it is a set up. And you are playing along.

Originally Posted by texassapper

The Democrats don't HAVE to vote no on this bill. But they will... and the reason is that they NEED the fraudulent voting to stay in power....

They don't HAVE to. They just don't want to play dumb games with this like the GOP has been trying to do.

Saying the Dems NEED this is not true at all. I will repeat myself again. Show me the proof of fraudulent voting. It barely exists and does not change national elections. Show. Me. The. Proof.

Originally Posted by texassapper

I don't have to show you, they will. With their "No" vote. That's the point of having our representatives vote... they are expressing the will of their constituents. (or should be). So when a Dem say No...it should not be illegal for foreigners to vote in US elections, they are TELLING YOU what they believe.

No. You don't have to. But the real truth is that you can't. There is no proof of almost everything you say in your posts. And you know it. Just like you also know that the Dems are not saying it should not be illegal for foreigners to vote. It won't stop you from saying it though. But things like this just make it worse.

Originally Posted by texassapper

If it's NOT a problem then this law is just a formality...

No. It is a piece of showboating bullshit. You know that too. It will make 160 million people go through hassles that are not needed. And it is so two-faced. The GOP fights unnecessary bureaucracy all the time. Until something like this.

Originally Posted by texassapper

Just explained it to you...

You have explained nothing. Just made the same arguments using the same bad logic and facts that are taken out of context.

Originally Posted by texassapper

good for you... You just explained you don't understand how voting is an expression of constituent will... Why would I care about your opinion on a matter you don't understand?

You just explained how you don't understand my points at all. I guess it is not enough that you misrepresent all of your facts. Now you do it with my arguments too. And you obviously care enough about my opinion to respond to me line by line by line. Seems to be a thing you do a lot. What a waste of time. Like I said I'm only doing this once. Paxton lies and misrepresents. You play along. Find something to talk about that is actually meaningful.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by hughjahol

This does not show what texassapper says it does. It shows that people support showing ID. It does not say 81 percent of people support having to prove citizenship.

Check your ID Einstien. Does it have a little gold star? Know why it does/should? Proves you are a US citizen. That started several years ago after 9/11. Clearly, we need to go back to have a basics civics test before people can vote.

[hughjahol]

Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Check your ID Einstien. Does it have a little gold star? Know why it does/should? Proves you are a US citizen. That started several years ago after 9/11. Clearly, we need to go back to have a basics civics test before people can vote.

OMG. Really? Too bad there is not a test for being able to post here. You should do your research, but I know that is frowned upon here. You just have to be a legal resident to get a realID. And legal residents who are non-citizens cannot vote.