Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 267
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70798
biomed163389
Yssup Rider61079
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48710
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42878
The_Waco_Kid37233
CryptKicker37224
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-05-2023, 02:57 PM   #16
texassapper
Valued Poster
 
texassapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,292
Encounters: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
umm, we have a mass shooting problem.
Who is doing all that shooting? Maybe what you think is the cause is simply a symptom? Try the five whys
Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
it's not even debatable.
uh, no. It is debatable. Anytime you say it's not, then you are simply a fcuking fascist
Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
we need bipartisan laws and regs to fix that.
According to a self professed firearms NON-EXPERT. Alternately, we could try enforcing the laws that are already on the books. with zero time off for anyone that commits a crime with a firearm. That won't happen because a certain political party thinks gun crime is useful as a tool to disarm it's enemies (the american voter; not just the right but ALL voters). So that down the road, they don't have to worry about being fired upon as they load people onto cattle cars for re-education because CLIMATE CHANGE!, or RAYCISS!, or whatever the thought for the day may become.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
we're the only first world country that is totally off the charts on mass shootings and gun deaths.
Would you care to educate us on the racial makeup of all this gun crime? Who is shooting whom? etc?

It's okay, I know you won't because to do so would break the narrative you've had established for you by the media, and the cool "P's" at college. You can figure it our for yourself... life often has a way to educate the ignorant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
the status quo is not acceptable.
Why? Explain what the status quo is and why it's not acceptable and according to who?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
banning assault rifles would be a great start.
A great way to start the government on the way to full blown authoritarianism. When the government doesn't fear the citizens it will do as it pleases... see China, USSR, North Korea, Nazi Germany, Venezuela, Iran, Cuba, any time and place where a free people have been disarmed.
texassapper is offline   Quote
Old 11-05-2023, 05:22 PM   #17
pxmcc
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 8, 2013
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 9,806
Encounters: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper View Post
Who is doing all that shooting? Maybe what you think is the cause is simply a symptom? Try the five whys
uh, no. It is debatable. Anytime you say it's not, then you are simply a fcuking fascist
According to a self professed firearms NON-EXPERT. Alternately, we could try enforcing the laws that are already on the books. with zero time off for anyone that commits a crime with a firearm. That won't happen because a certain political party thinks gun crime is useful as a tool to disarm it's enemies (the american voter; not just the right but ALL voters). So that down the road, they don't have to worry about being fired upon as they load people onto cattle cars for re-education because CLIMATE CHANGE!, or RAYCISS!, or whatever the thought for the day may become.
Would you care to educate us on the racial makeup of all this gun crime? Who is shooting whom? etc?

It's okay, I know you won't because to do so would break the narrative you've had established for you by the media, and the cool "P's" at college. You can figure it our for yourself... life often has a way to educate the ignorant.
Why? Explain what the status quo is and why it's not acceptable and according to who?
A great way to start the government on the way to full blown authoritarianism. When the government doesn't fear the citizens it will do as it pleases... see China, USSR, North Korea, Nazi Germany, Venezuela, Iran, Cuba, any time and place where a free people have been disarmed.
you are conflating banning assault rifles and disarmarment. why is it that civilians can't buy an Abrams? because an Abrams isn't designed for civilian use. it's a weapon of war. the same applies to assault rifles.

will that end all mass shootings? probably not. will it reduce gun deaths? as demonstrated in Australia, yes.
pxmcc is offline   Quote
Old 11-05-2023, 05:58 PM   #18
eccieuser9500
Valued Poster
 
eccieuser9500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,935
Encounters: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
you are conflating banning assault rifles and disarmarment. why is it that civilians can't buy an Abrams? because an Abrams isn't designed for civilian use. it's a weapon of war. the same applies to assault rifles.

will that end all mass shootings? probably not. will it reduce gun deaths? as demonstrated in Australia, yes.
Deliberately? Or unwittingly?
eccieuser9500 is offline   Quote
Old 11-05-2023, 06:00 PM   #19
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
you are conflating banning assault rifles and disarmarment. why is it that civilians can't buy an Abrams? because an Abrams isn't designed for civilian use. it's a weapon of war. the same applies to assault rifles.

will that end all mass shootings? probably not. will it reduce gun deaths? as demonstrated in Australia, yes.
Most murders are committed with Semi Auto Hand Guns and Revolvers. The reason why the Government wants to ban AR-15's is because it's a bigger threat to them than a pistol. Don't let them fool you they play numbers games and statistics games when it comes to Gun Control. They aren't interested in your safety or well being one dam bit.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 11-05-2023, 06:03 PM   #20
pxmcc
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 8, 2013
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 9,806
Encounters: 55
Default

to EccieUser: i can't speak to motivation.

^^let's allow lawsuits against gun manufacturers and retailers. suddenly these folks will start paying attention to the impact of selling inherently dangerous products to every Tom, Dick, and Harry who wants an assault rifle.

ideally, let's permit handguns and shotguns for personal defense and rifles for hunting, while carefully considering whether a given wannabe gun purchaser should even have a gun at all; furthermore, restricting assault rifles to SWAT Teams and the military.

this would build on the already-passed bipartisan reforms. obviously, they didn't go far enough because we're still having mass shootings.
pxmcc is offline   Quote
Old 11-05-2023, 06:18 PM   #21
offshoredrilling
Valued Poster
 
offshoredrilling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 12, 2009
Location: near Lake Ontario
Posts: 48,710
Encounters: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
to EccieUser: i can't speak to motivation.

^^let's allow lawsuits against gun manufacturers and retailers. suddenly these folks will start paying attention to the impact of selling inherently dangerous products to every Tom, Dick, and Harry who wants an assault rifle.

ideally, let's permit handguns and shotguns for personal defense and rifles for hunting, while carefully considering whether a given wannabe gun purchaser should even have a gun at all; furthermore, restricting assault rifles to SWAT Teams and the military.

this would build on the already-passed bipartisan reforms.
"selling inherently dangerous products to every Tom, Dick, and Harry who wants an... " like a car or pickup ????
offshoredrilling is offline   Quote
Old 11-05-2023, 06:37 PM   #22
pxmcc
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 8, 2013
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 9,806
Encounters: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by offshoredrilling View Post
"selling inherently dangerous products to every Tom, Dick, and Harry who wants an... " like a car or pickup ????
we make it way easier to buy a gun than to get a driver's license. that makes zero sense.

sure you can buy a car, but you can't legally drive it until you pass a 2-part test. i failed my field test twice before i finally succeeded on my 3rd try.

and of course car manufacturers and dealers can be held liable for negligence. why should gun manufacturers and dealers be any different?
pxmcc is offline   Quote
Old 11-05-2023, 06:57 PM   #23
eccieuser9500
Valued Poster
 
eccieuser9500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,935
Encounters: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
to EccieUser: i can't speak to motivation.

^^let's allow lawsuits against gun manufacturers and retailers. suddenly these folks will start paying attention to the impact of selling inherently dangerous products to every Tom, Dick, and Harry who wants an assault rifle.

ideally, let's permit handguns and shotguns for personal defense and rifles for hunting, while carefully considering whether a given wannabe gun purchaser should even have a gun at all; furthermore, restricting assault rifles to SWAT Teams and the military.

this would build on the already-passed bipartisan reforms. obviously, they didn't go far enough because we're still having mass shootings.

The gun lobby has too strong of a strangle-hold on lawmakers. Their long-money talks too much sense to politicians who leech off tax payers.

I'd like to put gun manufacturers to the sword myself as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by offshoredrilling View Post
"selling inherently dangerous products to every Tom, Dick, and Harry who wants an... " like a car or pickup ????
No. What the fuck? Vehicles are made for what? Transportation.

Weapons are made for what? Protection or execution. Do you get the difference? Sir?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
we make it way easier to buy a gun than to get a driver's license. that makes zero sense.

sure you can buy a car, but you can't legally drive it until you pass a 2-part test. i failed my field test twice before i finally succeeded on my 3rd try.

and of course car manufacturers and dealers can be held liable for negligence. why should gun manufacturers and dealers be any different?

Any sort of gun control is fought vehemently by their lobbyists. Who, they themselves, write the law.
eccieuser9500 is offline   Quote
Old 11-05-2023, 08:31 PM   #24
offshoredrilling
Valued Poster
 
offshoredrilling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 12, 2009
Location: near Lake Ontario
Posts: 48,710
Encounters: 36
Default

so a gun is like a car
offshoredrilling is offline   Quote
Old 11-05-2023, 10:39 PM   #25
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by offshoredrilling View Post
so a gun is like a car
... I see yer point, mate.
... People who speed and kill people with a car,
sue the car companys... See how far THAT goes.

... Me-own problem with gun control is that I DON'T WANT
the police and military being the onley ones with guns.

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 11-06-2023, 04:04 AM   #26
offshoredrilling
Valued Poster
 
offshoredrilling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 12, 2009
Location: near Lake Ontario
Posts: 48,710
Encounters: 36
Default

lots of illegal driving going on in NYS
just like no permit for that pop gun
offshoredrilling is offline   Quote
Old 11-10-2023, 12:04 AM   #27
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX View Post
Red Flag laws allow guns to be removed from the possession of those thought to be threat against themselves or others.

"The Red Flag Law, also known as the Extreme Risk Protection Order law, prevents individuals who show signs of being a threat to themselves or others from purchasing or possessing any kind of firearm.

The Red Flag Law provides procedural safeguards to ensure that no firearm is removed without due process while helping to prevent tragedies, like the school shooting in Parkland, Florida, and the racist mass shooting in Buffalo."

A person's guns are not removed from his possession until that person is deemed unfit at the time to have possession of those guns and that determination is made by close family/friends and agreed to by a judge.

You may also be correct when you state that when concealed carry is allowed, violent crime goes down. But it is also true that the states with more guns per capita have more homicides per capita. 9 of the 10 states with the most homicides per capita are red states. There is also a high correlation between states that are considered to be "gun-friendly" and high homicide rates.

https://www.criminalattorneycincinna...ides-by-state/

And while many, but far from all, the mass shootings do occur in schools which are fun-free zones, there is little to indicate that the locations for the shootings were chosen because of that. Usually the shooter has a vendetta against the school.
Nobody has the right to assume that.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 11-10-2023, 06:15 AM   #28
ICU 812
Valued Poster
 
ICU 812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,133
Encounters: 15
Default

When it comes to "mass shootings" it is my belief that the problem is not so much guns as it is mental health and how we deal with it. A much larger category of gun related deaths is suiside. . . .also a mental health issue.

As has been noted in another post, most killings, be they the murder of one person or several at once, are committed with a hand gun not a rifle. Most of these guns turn out to be illegally owned. It is my understanding that many to most of these killings are gang or drug related. This is a societal problem that more gun laws will not eliminate or even ameliorate, but effective law enforcement will.
ICU 812 is offline   Quote
Old 11-10-2023, 06:21 AM   #29
texassapper
Valued Poster
 
texassapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,292
Encounters: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
you are conflating banning assault rifles and disarmarment.
Again... you can't define what it is that you want to ban. THAT's why it is essentially a disarming of the citizens.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
why is it that civilians can't buy an Abrams? because an Abrams isn't designed for civilian use. it's a weapon of war. the same applies to assault rifles.
You claim that an object whose attributes you cannot define is a "weapon of war" and thus we should not allow civilians to own. "Keep and bear ARMS".... not artillery, ARMS. A tank is essentially a mobile artillery platform. In the same way the Founders were not advocating personal ownership of artillery, an Abrams is not covered by the 2nd Amendment. And nobody is advocating for your reductio ad absurdum.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
will that end all mass shootings? probably not. will it reduce gun deaths? as demonstrated in Australia, yes.
If you want to reduce gun deaths in the United States, you should be focused on handguns and perhaps not allowing convicted criminals back out on the streets. There's a racial element to who is killing Americans, and we all know who that is... but you won't address that because, well because you're a leftist.
texassapper is offline   Quote
Old 11-10-2023, 08:32 AM   #30
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,079
Encounters: 67
Default

They should ban mental illness. That seems to be the true cause of all the mass shootings in America these days, errrr, this month, errr, this week…
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved