Encounter: Luxe529

[wonderland696]

User ID: Seeking Luxe529
Date: 3/5/23
Name: Luxe529
Phone: -
Email Address: -
URL / Website: Seeking.com
City: albany
State: New York
Address: -
Activities: bbbj,hj,dato,daty,cfs
Hair Length and Color: long black or dark brown
Age: 30
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: Luxe529 is very petite, 5', 100lbs. her body is what I like to say, has not been touched by life. Meaning her body is almost perfect. well proportioned, no stretch marks, no fat, just toned and beautiful. small breasts that fit her tiny frame.
Recommendation: Yes

[goingfishing]

[soldierboy44]

[Tomb8871]

[wonderland696]

i cant read any responses because i was denied premium access by the communist party.

[Tomb8871]

Think you need to put in either a phone number or email address. My response nothing profound u didn't miss much there

[Scoot642]

You just did the review it may take overnight for them to read it. If not you need more contact and link info for the rest to see.

[EGrayupstate]

Without phone, etc. they wont give premium. Reviewing SA girls isn't worth it for premium

[Bighead1984]

Lol. Without a way to contact them or a link or anything you’re kinda just telling us about a chick you met online and fucked.

[Northerndancer]

In fairness her SA account is still up. Thanks for the review by the way. I’ve been wondering for months I’d she was legit or just another guy being a douche. The 1-2 photo girls always make me suspicious.

[wonderland696]

she's legit but i wasnt going to give out her number here. shes not a stg girl who posts her number openly.

[Tomb8871]

I would never do a review on SA lady without asking her if ok, and further would assume most of them won't want one to be done. OP did proper thing imo by not including contact info openly

[Hobby1750]

Wonderland696, thank you for the review. I appreciate it, as it's good info. Any Seeking member who isn't a full retard can figure out how to contact her, so no number needed.

Ignore the White Knights, there's nothing wrong with reviewing a Seeking whore. It's easy to forget what Seeking mostly is: a bunch of amateur hookers. There are a few toe-dippers sprinkled in, but it's mostly amateur escorts or full-time Sugar-whores. Especially those over the age of 25.

And don't worry, the Overlords here at Eccie are a bunch of serial killers on power-trips who get off on denying Premium Access when they're not murdering hookers. They discourage the information exchange and make the site much less useful than it could be.

[Tomb8871]

Originally Posted by Hobby1750

Wonderland696, thank you for the review. I appreciate it, as it's good info. Any Seeking member who isn't a full retard can figure out how to contact her, so no number needed.

Ignore the White Knights, there's nothing wrong with reviewing a Seeking whore. It's easy to forget what Seeking mostly is: a bunch of amateur hookers. There are a few toe-dippers sprinkled in, but it's mostly amateur escorts or full-time Sugar-whores. Especially those over the age of 25.

And don't worry, the Overlords here at Eccie are a bunch of serial killers on power-trips who get off on denying Premium Access when they're not murdering hookers. They discourage the information exchange and make the site much less useful than it could be.

Hobby-We usually agree, but I can't here. If woman on SA but not stg, she has reasonable expectation of some level of confidentiality. She only gives contact info out to those she implicitly vets by talking to them. She is not putting the info for all to see. Just think it just proper manners and decency not to "out" a girl without their agreement. Now if she robs or rips you off or tried to extort you or the like then all bets are off.I also have to take exception to white knight characterization-I and some others just happen to disagree with you on this matter.

[Hobby1750]

Originally Posted by Tomb8871

Hobby-We usually agree, but I can't here. If woman on SA but not stg, she has reasonable expectation of some level of confidentiality. She only gives contact info out to those she implicitly vets by talking to them. She is not putting the info for all to see. Just think it just proper manners and decency not to "out" a girl without their agreement. Now if she robs or rips you off or tried to extort you or the like then all bets are off.I also have to take exception to white knight characterization-I and some others just happen to disagree with you on this matter.

I agree there are some Seekings girls who are normal girls toe-dipping and not looking to be a UTR escort. The one reviewed here isn't in that "protected" category.