Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1
What Trial testimony would Cohen be recanting?
And as usual, you’re making up stuff, you believe that people in major prosecutions of organized crime haven’t had to recant prior sworn testimony. Lol. Ok. You’re reverting to your admitted tactic or lying when the facts don’t match your narrative.
|
if you say so
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1
State attorneys can only prosecute state crimes. They can’t prosecute federal crimes. That is the purview of the US Attorneys. Some laws have state analogs which would allow a state prosecution for a crime which might be prosecuted at the federal level. I’m unclear as to what you think is going on. ie cheating on your taxes is a federal crime. The states have a state analog to prosecute tax cheats and generally if you’ve cheated on your federal taxes you also cheated on your state taxes and can be prosecuted for what looks like the same crime at the state and federal level.
I suppose you need to be more specific with your hyperbole.
As for sharing or discussing anything with congress, Bragg was right to tell them to fuck off. Remember are you right wingers all states rights and shit. Congress has no authority over Bragg and he has no obligation to give them anything. And good luck with a subpoena. The Supreme Court would have to opine on that and I suspect even those nuts would side with Bragg.
Still awaiting this exculpatory evidence you claim was withheld.
|
excellent point. so how is Bragg,
New York County District Attorney, going to make a Federal election felony case? let's recap how he plans to do that. first, Bragg is basing all this on a misdemeanor record keeping fraud whose statute of limitations has long since expired, making the rather bizarre claim that Trump
had to repay Cohen, his personal lawyer with Trump Campaign funds for non-campaign work over a personal matter, simply because Trump was running for President. interesting. but it gets better .. in a bizarre way. to make a felony (which Bragg himself can't bring,
as you said) Bragg has to link this fraud record keeping misdemeanor to a federal election statute implemented during post Civil War reconstruction that has never been used before. sounds rock solid to me!
bahahahhaaaaa
let's note that Cyrus Vance Jr, Bragg's predecessor, looked at this and passed (at least he was still within the statute of limitations for the misdemeanor). Also, the DOJ looked into the case and found no case to bring and best for last even the FEC determined no election violations occurred.
Vance Jr. determined no case.
the DOJ determined no case.
the FEC determined no case.
Bragg thinks he has a case.
bahahahhaaaaa
