OAN Admits “No Widespread Voter Fraud By Election Workers” After Lawsuit Over Its Reporting

[royamcr]

Covid happened, this caused a huge amount of manual labor to deal with the mail in ballots. This wasn't written into state law because it has never happened and has never been a problem. Heck a lot of times mail in ballots and provisional ballots aren't even counted until well after the election because the margin of victory one way or the other is usually more than the amount of mailins/provisionals. They are counted though eventually but wouldn't cause a change in the election result. This time around there were so many mail ins they had to count them because in a lot of cases the number of them exceeded the margin of victory.

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Okay - you're getting better, Royamcr... The situation in PA was
a violation of state law... and votes WITHOUT proper signature
that should NOT have counted under the law.
Boxes and Boxes of them. ... Mules in PA also.

Went all the way to the state Supreme Court (7 members - 5 of them Dems)
who decided to ALLOW the votes - since Biden "won"...

Now YOU should research what happened over Wisconsin-way.

And in Arizona - the two recounts produced the SAME result
- a win for Biden - but they "re-counted the SAME ballots"
- without rejecting ones that maybe should have been rejected.

However, in THIS case - it was the Republicans who decided this.
And NOT the fault of the Dems.

Reckon the Repubs lacked the backbone to do the proper thing
and question the ballots.
Now I'm NOT saying they were fraud ballots - because I don't know,
but then-again we'll never know, because they wouldn't check.

### Salty

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

oh great.. YR is having a tranny dream.

Maybe some of your sick gay dick pics will straighten everybody out.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by royamcr

Covid happened, this caused a huge amount of manual labor to deal with the mail in ballots. This wasn't written into state law because it has never happened and has never been a problem. Heck a lot of times mail in ballots and provisional ballots aren't even counted until well after the election because the margin of victory one way or the other is usually more than the amount of mailins/provisionals. They are counted though eventually but wouldn't cause a change in the election result. This time around there were so many mail ins they had to count them because in a lot of cases the number of them exceeded the margin of victory.

... Yes, mate - I agree... But in a number of cases, "improper" ballots were counted. Ballots that lacked a proper signature or even no signature at all... And in addition, boxes of ballots
coming in that onley had "a vote for Joe Biden" on them.
No other vote on any of the ballots for any other candidate
for other elections. ... The Actuaries who study these results
will tell you THAT rarely happens. ... Groups of ballots
with just "one vote" on then.

The point I'm surely tryin' to make is that this whole thing
needs to be properly investigated.

### Salty

[royamcr]

The fact that many voters voted for Biden but not for candidates in other races, Powell argued, was problematic and indicative of fraud.

Bartiromo breaks down the 450,000 figure to five states, saying to Powell: "You say it’s 98,000 ballots in Pennsylvania, 80,000 to 90,000 in Georgia, another 42,000 in Arizona, 69,000 to 115,000 in Michigan and 62,000 in Wisconsin." The numbers do add up to approximately 450,000 votes and appear to have originated in a Nov. 7 tweet by the editor of a conservative news website called The National Pulse.

But this omits the context that undervoting, a practice where voters mark their choice for one race but skip making selections in other races down the ballot, is not a new or shocking phenomenon. It occurs in every election.

More than 24 million people voted in the election in the states that Bartiromo cites, making the 450,000 people who Powell says apparently voted for Biden and skipped the rest of the ballot less than 2%.

Full Story:

https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...-only-biden-k/

They throw around these seemingly huge numbers like 450,000, but in reality it is a very low percent of the votes.

Those who are falsely claiming potential fraud because of 450,000 ballots marked only for Biden need to report how many ballots they found marked only for Trump and no other candidate; it would likely be a similarly high number," Speel said.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by royamcr

...This wasn't written into state law because it has never happened and has never been a problem....

Three words for ya: "Spanish Flu 1918".

Reconcile. Irrational rationalization much?

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Democrat Official in Virginia Indicted on Plethora of Election Fraud-Related Counts

A Democrat holding public office in Buchanan County, Virginia, has been indicted on 82 felony counts, including 34 counts of making false statements related to election fraud.

In a press release, the Russel County Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office announced that a grand jury indicted Knox District Supervisor Trey Adkins on a slew of felony counts. Adkins, who has held the position since 2011, faces 34 counts of making false statements related to election fraud, 15 counts of uttering public records, 11 counts of absentee voting procedure violation, 11 counts of forgery of public record, 8 counts of public embezzlement, and 3 counts of conspiracy to make false statements – election fraud.
...
Numerous Knox District voters, whose absentee applications were allegedly filled out by Adkins, testified in the year-long probe – the majority of whom expressed that the “Reason Code” on their absentee ballot applications was false, the indictment asserted. Some of the incorrect information included fake travel plans to locations outside of Buchanan County and fabricated disabilities for individuals who were not disabled, according to the indictment. Adkins allegedly knew that these voters whose applications cited disabilities in the reason code were employed full-time.

The document notes that some of the witnesses who testified provided signatures that were not consistent with the signatures on their absentee ballot forms. The witnesses, who allegedly did not fill out the documents, believe their signatures were forged.
...

Does that mean it's false?

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Three words for ya: "Spanish Flu 1918".

Reconcile. Irrational rationalization much?

Come on now, voting was way different 100 years ago, population was sparse and much lower around 100million and 18.5 million votes were cast for president. Everything was done precinct by precinct and it took however long it took to tally up votes.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by royamcr

The fact that many voters voted for Biden but not for candidates in other races, Powell argued, was problematic and indicative of fraud.

Bartiromo breaks down the 450,000 figure to five states, saying to Powell: "You say it’s 98,000 ballots in Pennsylvania, 80,000 to 90,000 in Georgia, another 42,000 in Arizona, 69,000 to 115,000 in Michigan and 62,000 in Wisconsin." The numbers do add up to approximately 450,000 votes and appear to have originated in a Nov. 7 tweet by the editor of a conservative news website called The National Pulse.

But this omits the context that undervoting, a practice where voters mark their choice for one race but skip making selections in other races down the ballot, is not a new or shocking phenomenon. It occurs in every election.

More than 24 million people voted in the election in the states that Bartiromo cites, making the 450,000 people who Powell says apparently voted for Biden and skipped the rest of the ballot less than 2%.

Full Story:

https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...-only-biden-k/

They throw around these seemingly huge numbers like 450,000, but in reality it is a very low percent of the votes.

Those who are falsely claiming potential fraud because of 450,000 ballots marked only for Biden need to report how many ballots they found marked only for Trump and no other candidate; it would likely be a similarly high number," Speel said.

... No, if it were the case - the number would be out already
to show it was similar. ... Dems would be all-over this
and showing it. ... You also must remember "THE AREAS" where
the boxes of ballots came-from. ... It doesn't happen THERE in every election -
which is WHY this surely stands out.

Not to mention the many people - poll workers and vote counters
- who signed sworn statements of "wrong-doing" that they saw
on election night and in the days after.

The FBI and DOJ surely couldn't wait to get the statements.
NOT so they could investigate - but to sit on them.

... Which is why there will be better investigations
next year - when Republicans control Congress.

### Salty

[royamcr]

No they are only showing the 450,000 undervotes for Biden to fit their narrative. It is probably more like 900,000 undervotes and around half are for trump only. But they wont show that because it fucks their story.

[Salty Again]

... There is no narrative, mate.. Just facts and more facts.

You and I can surely agree to dis-agree - and that's fine.
But don't discount all the other truths that we conservatives
have pointed out FIRST - before everyone else.

Like the Hunter laptop was REAL - and the contents REAL.
We said it BEFORE the election.
While fifty (50) "Intelligence Officials" told ya it was FAKE.
So did the main stream media.

... And who was correct? ... WE WERE!

... Now we're telling you that there was voter fraud in the election.
Reckon YOU can make up yer-own mind.

### Salty

[royamcr]

There is always a narrative, you gotta dig for both sides of the story. One side will never tell you evidence that refutes their claim.

What are the exact contents?

What 50 officials?

Hunter isn't president, Joe is, so it doesn't matter.

It's always some stupid conspiracy to discredit the other side. Hillary's emails, nothingburger. Benghazi, while unfortunate, most likely republican's fault for not approving security funding.

Joe senile? No evidence of that given.

Joe doesn't know what he is doing? What about the 100s of advisers and subject matter experts that help in decision making? I suppose they are all dumb and senile also???

It is plainly stupid to think that Joe just at any whim makes decisions because he knows every thing. No president ever does that. There is just too much to know and it is constantly changing.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... No, if it were the case - the number would be out already
to show it was similar. ... Dems would be all-over this
and showing it. ... You also must remember "THE AREAS" where
the boxes of ballots came-from. ... It doesn't happen THERE in every election -
which is WHY this surely stands out.

Not to mention the many people - poll workers and vote counters
- who signed sworn statements of "wrong-doing" that they saw
on election night and in the days after.

The FBI and DOJ surely couldn't wait to get the statements.
NOT so they could investigate - but to sit on them.

... Which is why there will be better investigations
next year - when Republicans control Congress.

### Salty

You sound exactly like the Gore team of 2000.

I could point out numerous reasons Gore was cheated out of a win in 2000.

2000 miles is what you're hanging your hat on....Gore was hanging Chad's.

It don't matter.....there are no do lovers.

Republicans have 6 Justice on the SC....you don't have to worry for the next 30 years....Republicans will be winning national elections. They will be able to change the voting rules to their advantage in red states and to be fair....blue states will do the same. But the SC is going back to pre 1930 rilulings. Pro business and more pro business.

It is going to be like Back to the Future, Robber Barron style.

[royamcr]

Difference is gore didn't cry about it for a year and a half like a winey little bitch trump is. Post election analysis showed gore would have narrowly lost even if the ballots in question were tallied.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by royamcr

Difference is gore didn't cry about it for a year and a half like a winey little bitch trump is. Post election analysis showed gore would have narrowly lost even if the ballots in question were tallied.

It is actually kinda funny how woke and entitled they are....all the while crying about wokeism!

And 99% of these Trump lovers thought he was an idiot before he won the nomination in 2016. If I remember correctly most supported Cruz.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by WTF

It is actually kinda funny how woke and entitled they are....all the while crying about wokeism!

And 99% of these Trump lovers thought he was an idiot before he won the nomination in 2016. If I remember correctly most supported Cruz.

do you actually think conservatives are woke? and trump supporters in particular?