Who Leaked The Supreme Court Draft?

[royamcr]

Was waiting for this, lol

SCOTUS Leaker Increasingly Seems to Be Right-Winger

[Salty Again]

... Go on with ya, mate... Rather bleedin' obvious it was
a liberal staffer - they know it already.

You surely need to start to look at VARIOUS news sources, Royamcr.
Not just the liberal news media.

For example... Do ya STILL believe the FIFTY "Intelligence Officials"
about the laptop being FAKE?? ... We conservatives KNEW it was real
all the time... Just sayin'...

... YOU are intelligent enough to NOT FOLLOW anyone else and
just make up YOUR-OWN mind.

#### Salty

[Grace Preston]

Heh....


I'm gonna go full conspiracy with this one. Who do I think leaked it? Someone connected to Justice Thomas. Why? First, it would go along with the notion of wanting to make sure that the initial opinions stuck and second, it would put attention on this issue and take attention off of the Ginny Thomas issue.



Tis a win-win for his camp.

[WTF]

What Justice Thomas is Q?

How great would that be?

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by Grace Preston

I'm gonna go full conspiracy with this one. Who do I think leaked it? Someone connected to Justice Thomas. Why? First, it would go along with the notion of wanting to make sure that the initial opinions stuck and second, it would put attention on this issue and take attention off of the Ginny Thomas issue.

Violates Occams razor. And it doesn't make a lot of sense for the Conservatives to get themselves lined up to have death threats being made on themselves.

No, if it had been a Conservative or a Conservative clerk, the FBI would have already perp walked them.

You know it was a liberal and that's why it'll take "months" for the culprit to be "found out". Even though the pool of potential leakers is smaller than a football team.

[Grace Preston]

Occams razor shouldn't really be applied when we're talking American politics.


He really should have recused himself from that vote in regards to the January 6th records-- the optics on it are really..... REALLY bad.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Grace Preston

Heh....


I'm gonna go full conspiracy with this one. Who do I think leaked it? Someone connected to Justice Thomas. .

Have you read the nutcases posting their conspiracy content as if it is gospel? They would not even give you the password to the koolaid with that one.

Their conspiracies must have a pedophile, a Clinton/Obama/Biden and voter fraud before they'll even send it to Russia to have a Meme made

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by Grace Preston

Occams razor shouldn't really be applied when we're talking American politics.

Why?

Originally Posted by Grace Preston

He really should have recused himself from that vote in regards to the January 6th records-- the optics on it are really..... REALLY bad.

Did Kagan recuse herself from the obamacare case? Optics are for Communists... time to stop playing pussyfoot with the left. No reason the Right should care about optics when it's obvious the Left doesn't..

Hence the ILLEGAL protest in front of Alitos home last night. It's illegal but it's okay because it's the LEFT.

Fcuk that.

[Grace Preston]

I'm curious-- how is the protest illegal? I can grasp actions committed during a protest being illegal, but not the act of protest itself.



I feel the same way about Kagan, btw. My attitudes on these things don't waver depending on the political party involved.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by Grace Preston

I'm curious-- how is the protest illegal? I can grasp actions committed during a protest being illegal, but not the act of protest itself.

8 U.S. Code Section 1507 --

• Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or
• with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty,
• pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or
• in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or
• with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence,
• shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

[Grace Preston]

Ahh-- gotta prove they are intending to impede or influence, though. That's the catch--many of these people are still going to protest, even if the ruling is final.



Yeah-- you and I may have opinions on whether or not they are attempting to influence-- but the issue for a conviction is to prove it.

[HedonistForever]

• near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or
• with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence,
• shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

We have all seen the video Grace. Were the protesters near a residence occupied by a judge making lots of noise? This is an illegal act but if we don't have law enforcement ready to use this law simply because it's the Left, then this shit has to change. Arrest and charge every one of these fuckers and stop this shit.


If it were up to me, nobody could protest in any residential neighborhood no matter who lives there.

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by Grace Preston

Ahh-- gotta prove they are intending to impede or influence, though. That's the catch--many of these people are still going to protest, even if the ruling is final.



Yeah-- you and I may have opinions on whether or not they are attempting to influence-- but the issue for a conviction is to prove it.

Simplest thing in the world to prove. Since the bill hasn't passed or failed yet, this is intent to influence one way or another. I say put it to a jury and let the courts rule. Isn't that how our system is supposed to work?

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by Grace Preston

Ahh-- gotta prove they are intending to impede or influence, though. That's the catch--many of these people are still going to protest, even if the ruling is final.

Yeah-- you and I may have opinions on whether or not they are attempting to influence-- but the issue for a conviction is to prove it.

That's for the court to decide.... but the law is obvious... and yet law "enforcement" stood idly by and arrested no one. Meanwhile January 6 folks are facing indefinite detention for walking into a building they were INVITED into.

And before anyone disputes that, ALL the doors on the Capitol are Mag locked. They CANNOT be opened by default UNLESS someone ACTS to open them or a fire alarm is pulled. No fire alarm went off on January 6th which means by DEFINITION, the Capitol Police OPENED the doors. That fact alone ought to end any arrest and prosecution. But it doesn't...

No justice, no peace... isn't that how the saying goes?

The shooting portion of this conflict is fast approaching since the Left knows they are going to get crushed in the election this fall. How to avoid that? Let's burn some fcuking cities, baby. You can already see pANTIFAg getting spun up for action during this summer.

Save this post.. you can refer to it during the riots this summer and fall.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by HedonistForever

• near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or
• with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence,
• shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

We have all seen the video Grace. Were the protesters near a residence occupied by a judge making lots of noise? This is an illegal act but if we don't have law enforcement ready to use this law simply because it's the Left, then this shit has to change. Arrest and charge every one of these fuckers and stop this shit.


If it were up to me, nobody could protest in any residential neighborhood no matter who lives there.

My guess is if and when the break into the SC Chambers waving Rebel Flags ....then they will be treated like the January 6 insurgency, if not worse.