Gents Reviews are not References!

[Baconman]

I don't think Rockydoc meant anything by his comment. Just his sense of humor. By the way I used to stay atHoliday Inn Express about 15 days a month for work. Miss them nights of fun. Sure helped with screening.

[TimeToPlayDr]

Originally Posted by Baconman

I don't think Rockydoc meant anything by his comment. Just his sense of humor. By the way I used to stay atHoliday Inn Express about 15 days a month for work. Miss them nights of fun. Sure helped with screening.

Ok, very good - my apologies.
(Too bad we can't have these discussions over a round or two or three of drinks - it's much easier to joke around and not be misunderstood.)

[Rockydoc]

Just a joke about the old holiday inn express commercials

[pyramider]

Originally Posted by TimeToPlayDr

As an absolute newbie to this with no references and no reviews on here I'm finding myself between a rock and a hard place since I'm also not willing to reveal RW info as the risk is too great from both a professional and personal standpoint.
I completely understand and sympathize with providers needing to insure their own safety and confidentiality, but what's a guy like me to do?

I here model trains are a fun hobby.

Originally Posted by Portrush

I have to disagree with this comparison. Swapping real world info at a bar or a business card for a free sandwich is socially acceptable and certainly not illegal activity. I think the majority of those with hesitation of giving real world info want to remain as anonymous as possible for fear of being outed or associated with anything hobby related.

Originally Posted by jeffycisme

does it work both ways do we as clients get your real world info as well

I doubt either one of you actually research ladies prior to contacting them. Remember, you are contacting the lady and not visa versa. Put in your due diligence prior to to contacting a lady. If you actually do this you should not have any issue supplying screening information.

[MJewel]

Exactly

[MJewel]

Originally Posted by Hot Summer

I completely agree with that.
And other providers with that horrible behavior shouldn’t effect the ones with a stellar reputations.

Exactly

[MJewel]

Originally Posted by WMJ4657

I think it's fine you require what you require for your safety but accept the fact that many of us know of one in Arkansas who is well known for outing people and has associates who try to backdoor information to pass on. Bullshit tactic

I will not give out my personal information but do have ways of providing enough information that I can be cleared. If not I will move on to a lady who is comfortable with info I do provide

My 2cents

I can guarantee that “one” your speaking of probably won’t post here. I’m not always 💯 sure what others will do. But my job is to keep all my clients info confidential. I am here to protect you. This is our livelihood. “Lovely hot Summer” is stellar concerning protecting the client. Suggestion, if we are telling you were solid.... We are.

[Hot Summer]

Originally Posted by MJewel

I can guarantee that “one” your speaking of probably won’t post here. I’m not always 💯 sure what others will do. But my job is to keep all my clients info confidential. I am here to protect you. This is our livelihood. “Lovely hot Summer” is stellar concerning protecting the client. Suggestion, if we are telling you were solid.... We are.

Thank you very much Macey!
I have 8yrs of providing professional service that includes protecting personal information.
Once the fellas do their homework life becomes so much easier.
I've never outted ,blackmailed , blacklisted , stalked or harrassed anyone during my career!
Cant say this for some of the Top promoted ladies in this area .
I asked that this thread be closed but I'm just a provider so they don't really care .

I Just wanted to pop on and thank you

[Rockydoc]

Originally Posted by Hot Summer

Thank you very much Macey!
I have 8yrs of providing professional service that includes protecting personal information.
Once the fellas do their homework life becomes so much easier.
I've never outted ,blackmailed , blacklisted , stalked or harrassed anyone during my career!
Cant say this for some of the Top promoted ladies in this area .
I asked that this thread be closed but I'm just a provider so they don't really care .

I Just wanted to pop on and thank you

That is some spicy information there.

[Hot Summer]

Originally Posted by Rockydoc

That is some spicy information there.

I'm not sure whats spicy about it but I'm sure you'll pic it apart and find something 😏
Have a great day sir

[biomed1]

Originally Posted by Hot Summer

I asked that this thread be closed but I'm just a provider so they don't really care .

Your request to close the Thread was considered IAW Guideline # 21.
This was noted in Post #27 - https://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p...6&postcount=27

The Thread remained on Topic and continues to do so.
There were no violations as listed in the body of Guideline # 21
Therefore, the Thread remains open.

#21 - ECCIE Staff will go to great lengths to avoid editing, deleting, or censoring our members posts or threads...unless absolutely necessary. Forbidden topics such as underage sex, illicit drugs, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance will be removed from public view. Controversial, troublesome, or objectionable posts may draw staff attention or in some cases disciplinary action, but the offending post will not be removed from the view of our membership in any but the most extreme cases. Often times you will find directions, footnotes, or other guidance from staff edited INTO posts which draw our attention. These are for the purpose of educating the readers of what is and what is not acceptable as well as informing others about how these issues have been dealt with. Members are encouraged to RTM posts which include rule infractions or objectionable material if it appears that staff has not already becomed involved with the thread or post in particular.
Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.

[Hot Summer]

[Rockydoc]

Nothing about you was spicy but that was some alarming info you posted about another