maybe some liberals here would like to have these guys as neighbors

[DrivesAllDay]

I for one would welcome some illegals from Mexico. I could hire someone to cut the grass, shovel the snow. Damn neighborhood kids are too lazy to do it.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by Dogface78

They are tryed to marginalize one of the few real Republicans left in the party with what they did to Liz Cheney.
IMO she is going to be a force to be reckoned with in the future!

99% of the nonsense you posted is too silly to even warrant a reply. However this statement above is beyond dumb ass crazy.

Liz Cheney is irrelevant. Anyone who thinks she is a force to be reckoned with in the future obviously has no clue what they are talking about

[bambino]

Originally Posted by berryberry

99% of the nonsense you posted is too silly to even warrant a reply. However this statement above is beyond dumb ass crazy.

Liz Cheney is irrelevant. Anyone who thinks she is a force to be reckoned with in the future obviously has no clue what they are talking about

Yeah, She won’t win re-election. She’s toast. DF may know a little about the AMP scene. Maybe. But he’s an ok guy.

[deellesamson]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

Yes, it's quite clear that some here were drawn to Trump by his hateful rhetoric, due to their irrational fear and hate, which causes them to demonstrate the lack of ability to do reality based probability calculations. That some consider a random photo of brown skinned men with possible gang tattoos to be proof of anything is quite telling.


Here's some actual evidence that Mexican immigrants in Texas (surely one of the states with the most Mexican immigrants), commit crimes at a rate that is lower than American citizens:

"In 2018, the illegal immigrant criminal conviction rate was 782 per 100,000 illegal immigrants, 535 per 100,000 legal immigrants, and 1,422 per 100,000 native‐​born Americans. The illegal immigrant criminal conviction rate was 45 percent below that of native‐​born Americans in Texas. The general pattern of native‐​born Americans having the highest criminal conviction rates followed by illegal immigrants and then with legal immigrants having the lowest holds for all of other specific types of crimes such as violent crimes, property crimes, homicide, and sex crimes."

https://www.cato.org/blog/new-resear...ration-crime-0

Like I said, irrational fear.

Interesting thread. I also saw the replies from Chloe's in the coed about the racism and such. While I do believe 1pittsburgh means well to call out no AA providers and such, or to believe in the potential of good humanity on his stance of illegals, I just thought I'd douse the flames or something

I guess if you are going by definition, no AA providers are quite literally being racist. But in my opinion there are a lot of colloquially used terms about certain words or thoughts that come with a default flavor of connotation. Racism is one of them. If we look at, for example, an affirmative action employer or school, you should be able to say their practice is "racist" too quite literally speaking; they are essentially taking race into account. Actually I suppose the webster definition always throws in the belief that one's race is superior, or that another's is inferior, but this isn't (I hope/believe) what is behind the affirmative action motive, and this likewise isn't always the case with the no AA providers. In my opinion a more appropriate definition of racism would just be one that filters or takes into account take, period, without there being believe of superiority/inferiority (negative connotation) or some sort of effort to assist those of certain races for certain reasons (potentially neutral or arguably positive connotation). If I am straight, maybe you can say I'm being sexist when I deny to share my time and efforts to pursue men? Or maybe that comparison seems silly, but when I am better rested or if someone jumps me about the perspective of my entire argument I'll perhaps try to better highlight why connotation is more important than the root issue, or at least is just as significant.

When I was initially turned away by an Asian provider in Cranberry, this was because I pass for AA. I don't know if it is relevant or necessary that I disclose whether or not I am here. Her concern whatever was not a disinterest in being with someone she felt inferior to her. It was not even perhaps a concern for her safety, a possible neutral or positive argument for the "racist" providers that say no AA for this reason. Her concern was simply "how big are you?" and she told me flat out before asking to see my member, "[if] you too big, you go home"!. Sure, this doesn't mean there aren't truly racists among the providers. It also doesn't mean what this girl and the lot of them saying "no AA" are doing isn't racist (at least in my opinion as I've hopefully now clarified). It's just filtering. I believe Bambino or someone in the other thread said it's just preference as he chooses not to see AA providers as he typically doesn't find himself drawn to them. I think the why the filtering is done though is where you should focus your criticisms.

P.S. Bambino I think you just haven't found the AA girls that you're attracted to yet is all! Imo at the end of the day beauty is beauty and if you come across one you like (which I'm sure you probably have before) the heart will let you know! Sometimes I say I'm not into AA girls as well but this may be a matter of simple stats; you're arguable in general and perhaps over your life have been exposed to more whites than blacks, and therefore statistically speaking maybe more opportunity to find whites that you are drawn to versus the AA girls? I know I find my AA lovers once in a blue moon! This perhaps doesn't account for intrinsic features of whites, blacks, or any race. But I think it's perhaps a factor and why I now try to say I haven't found her yet versus "I don't prefer AA" as it isn't necessarily always true or the case

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by deellesamson

P.S. Bambino I think you just haven't found the AA girls that you're attracted to yet is all!

LOL - Oh I believe he has. Sexy Nia was the bomb who used to visit on occasion - such a nice tasty treat. I am sure Bam saw her

[bambino]

Originally Posted by deellesamson

Interesting thread. I also saw the replies from Chloe's in the coed about the racism and such. While I do believe 1pittsburgh means well to call out no AA providers and such, or to believe in the potential of good humanity on his stance of illegals, I just thought I'd douse the flames or something

I guess if you are going by definition, no AA providers are quite literally being racist. But in my opinion there are a lot of colloquially used terms about certain words or thoughts that come with a default flavor of connotation. Racism is one of them. If we look at, for example, an affirmative action employer or school, you should be able to say their practice is "racist" too quite literally speaking; they are essentially taking race into account. Actually I suppose the webster definition always throws in the belief that one's race is superior, or that another's is inferior, but this isn't (I hope/believe) what is behind the affirmative action motive, and this likewise isn't always the case with the no AA providers. In my opinion a more appropriate definition of racism would just be one that filters or takes into account take, period, without there being believe of superiority/inferiority (negative connotation) or some sort of effort to assist those of certain races for certain reasons (potentially neutral or arguably positive connotation). If I am straight, maybe you can say I'm being sexist when I deny to share my time and efforts to pursue men? Or maybe that comparison seems silly, but when I am better rested or if someone jumps me about the perspective of my entire argument I'll perhaps try to better highlight why connotation is more important than the root issue, or at least is just as significant.

When I was initially turned away by an Asian provider in Cranberry, this was because I pass for AA. I don't know if it is relevant or necessary that I disclose whether or not I am here. Her concern whatever was not a disinterest in being with someone she felt inferior to her. It was not even perhaps a concern for her safety, a possible neutral or positive argument for the "racist" providers that say no AA for this reason. Her concern was simply "how big are you?" and she told me flat out before asking to see my member, "[if] you too big, you go home"!. Sure, this doesn't mean there aren't truly racists among the providers. It also doesn't mean what this girl and the lot of them saying "no AA" are doing isn't racist (at least in my opinion as I've hopefully now clarified). It's just filtering. I believe Bambino or someone in the other thread said it's just preference as he chooses not to see AA providers as he typically doesn't find himself drawn to them. I think the why the filtering is done though is where you should focus your criticisms.

P.S. Bambino I think you just haven't found the AA girls that you're attracted to yet is all! Imo at the end of the day beauty is beauty and if you come across one you like (which I'm sure you probably have before) the heart will let you know! Sometimes I say I'm not into AA girls as well but this may be a matter of simple stats; you're arguable in general and perhaps over your life have been exposed to more whites than blacks, and therefore statistically speaking maybe more opportunity to find whites that you are drawn to versus the AA girls? I know I find my AA lovers once in a blue moon! This perhaps doesn't account for intrinsic features of whites, blacks, or any race. But I think it's perhaps a factor and why I now try to say I haven't found her yet versus "I don't prefer AA" as it isn't necessarily always true or the case

What are you talking about? I’ve seen many AA providers. One of my ATFs is SexxyNia, who is black. What I said there are AA providers who won’t see AA men.


https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1041599

I would see her ever time she came to town.

[1pittsburgh]

Back on topic: no comments from the conservatives, now that their fear and anger based theory about how dangerous the immigrants coming here are has been debunked by solid data from Texas? Chizzy, maybe you want to post another pic of brown skinned people with tattoos as proof of what you're saying? What ever happened to that caravan? Also, is it the chicken or the egg? Are you attracted to Trump because of your irrational fear of immigrants, or did Trump's rhetoric cause you to have the irrational fear? BTW, looking at your reviews, your position on illegal immigrants is quite hypocritical. Are you only afraid of brown skinned immigrants?

[Dogface78]

Berry, because I dont share your ultra white nationalist far right conspiracy theory believing traitors molesters and Bimbos are alright with me racist Bullshit, what I post is silly?

Is it as silly as the Republican party has degrading to the party of traitors, molesters, and Bimbos! If this was your goal then
Congrats!
You've done well!

And of what I of what I posted this was your whole takeaway?
Liz Cheney?
Good for you!
I said alot in that post, you must be in agreement with most of it so I'll give myself a 98% and a gold star!
And Bam, I dont know politics?
You mean I dont worship at the altar of Trump?

There is a special place in hell for him and anybody else that helped him try to destroy our constitution and the Republic! He wasn't treated any differently in this election than any other candidate was throughout our history.
He's just a whining little bitch, (as apparently his followers are too) that can hear the keys of his jailers rattling!
I'm not going to waste my time arguing with you two, it is reassuring to know that Trump will likely end his days in one of many prison cells calling his name as all traitorous POS should!
Maybe you two can get conjugal visits!
I'm gonna sit back and enjoy the show!
Good day gentleman!

Originally Posted by berryberry

99% of the nonsense you posted is too silly to even warrant a reply. However this statement above is beyond dumb ass crazy.

Liz Cheney is irrelevant. Anyone who thinks she is a force to be reckoned with in the future obviously has no clue what they are talking about

[chizzy]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

Back on topic: no comments from the conservatives, now that their fear and anger based theory about how dangerous the immigrants coming here are has been debunked by solid data from Texas? Chizzy, maybe you want to post another pic of brown skinned people with tattoos as proof of what you're saying? What ever happened to that caravan? Also, is it the chicken or the egg? Are you attracted to Trump because of your irrational fear of immigrants, or did Trump's rhetoric cause you to have the irrational fear? BTW, looking at your reviews, your position on illegal immigrants is quite hypocritical. Are you only afraid of brown skinned immigrants?

First off, I never posted a pic of a brown skin person with tats unless it was attached to a new article I pasted. That's a lie on ur part. Secondly u found one article and there are dozens that say the opposite. It is a fact that the new policy of joe is to not turn away people crossing the border if they have a criminal record unless it is one of terrorist activity or the most serious of acts. Any fucking moron know that if someone has a criminal record let's say of theft and assault, the odds that they will commit that crime again is much higher than someone with no record of such. As to my reviews, I dont post reviews anymore nor do i need to explain who i see or why to someone like you. U have a habit of stalking and trying to bait people like a little boy. You arent worth the time little man.

[deellesamson]

Originally Posted by bambino

What are you talking about? I’ve seen many AA providers. One of my ATFs is SexxyNia, who is black. What I said there are AA providers who won’t see AA men.


https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1041599

I would see her ever time she came to town.

Sorry mate it was late and I think I recalled incorrectly who said they hadn’t a preference for AA; it was swpa1706 I should’ve addressed that to

[bambino]

Originally Posted by deellesamson

Sorry mate it was late and I think I recalled incorrectly who said they hadn’t a preference for AA; it was swpa1706 I should’ve addressed that to

No problem.

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by chizzy

First off, I never posted a pic of a brown skin person with tats unless it was attached to a new article I pasted. That's a lie on ur part. Secondly u found one article and there are dozens that say the opposite. It is a fact that the new policy of joe is to not turn away people crossing the border if they have a criminal record unless it is one of terrorist activity or the most serious of acts. Any fucking moron know that if someone has a criminal record let's say of theft and assault, the odds that they will commit that crime again is much higher than someone with no record of such. As to my reviews, I dont post reviews anymore nor do i need to explain who i see or why to someone like you. U have a habit of stalking and trying to bait people like a little boy. You arent worth the time little man.

Not a lie, a mistake. I accidentally attributed Lusty's post to you because you both have demonstrated an irrational fear of immigrants. Looking at your reviews, you don't seem to have an issue with asian illegal immigrants, so it's probably mainly the brown skin ones that you have a problem with.

It's not an article, or an opinion like the ones you might find. It's cold hard facts from a study done by the conservative Cato Institute. They looked at ALL the criminal convictions in Texas in 2018 and found that American citizens were convicted of crimes at a rate that was 40% higher than that of illegal immigrants. Considering that Texas is ground zero for illegal immigration, and also that Texas is the only state that keeps these statistics in regards to the immigration or citizen status of those who are convicted of crimes, it's the definitive study about this subject. The numbers simply do not back up your hateful and fearful narrative. You can resort to all the personal insults you want, and go find some hateful opinion pieces, but that doesn't change the fact that illegal immigrants simply do not commit crimes at a rate that's higher than American citizens.




I know that I've wasted my time here, because you will continue to spread this fearful narrative, but at least maybe some others will see how you are. Notice that seven people liked my initial comment in this thread, which makes it by far the most popular comment. It's 2021. The Archie Bunker routine is getting really old. Time to get over the fear and hate.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by Dogface78

And of what I of what I posted this was your whole takeaway?
Liz Cheney?
Good for you!
I said alot in that post, you must be in agreement with most of it so I'll give myself a 98% and a gold star!
And Bam, I dont know politics?
You mean I dont worship at the altar of Trump?

No. I will try to spell it out more slowly for you since you seem to have trouble comprehending. I said "99% of the nonsense you posted is too silly to even warrant a reply. However your statement about Liz Cheney being a force to be reckoned with is beyond dumb ass crazy."

And just like your original post, the rest of the nonsense in your latest reply is too silly to even warrant a reply.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

Not a lie, a mistake.

So in other words - you lied.

Ok then

[bambino]

Originally Posted by berryberry

So in other words - you lied.

Ok then

All liberals lies are “mistakes”