Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right fake news website. The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.
Says who? You? Prove what the article they posted is false? Have they’ve lost lawsuits like NYT, WAPO, CNN? I’m sure you regard those as credible yeah? That’s why you’re in a deep sleep. TGP isn’t far right, just the anti MSM. All you have is attacking the messenger, not the message. Predictable.
From the video in the link you provided in post #25. Navarro is discussing the audit with Bannon. The chart shows the total of "Possible Illegal Votes" at 601,130.
The biggest category (305,701, or more than half) is titled "Absentee Ballots Cast That Were Requested Before & After Statutory Deadline". What does that mean? If the ballots were requested before the deadline, they may be valid. After the deadline, not.
The previous table, presumably from a day earlier in the audit, said the total of "Possible Illegal Votes" was 254,722. The biggest category had a different title - "Mail-In Ballots Cast By Voters Registered After the Registration Deadline" - and a nice round number of 150,000. If someone tried to add 150k names & addresses to the Maricopa County registration rolls after the deadline, I think it would have been noticed.
I'm all for strengthening voter integrity laws. But I want to see the fraud up close with my own eyes. We need to pinpoint exactly where it's coming from in order to stop it.
Says who? You? Prove what the article they posted is false? Have they’ve lost lawsuits like NYT, WAPO, CNN? I’m sure you regard those as credible yeah? That’s why you’re in a deep sleep. TGP isn’t far right, just the anti MSM. All you have is attacking the messenger, not the message. Predictable.
Because the messenger, as you so liberally call it, is a lying piece of shit targeting a fringe segment of the conscious population.
Seems you got tangled up in their web of bull puckey.
Oh, and seems like everybody says so... these false prophets have been lying about Arizona from the jump. Proof below.
Dating back to 2011, The Washington Post began to include "China Watch" advertising supplements provided by China Daily, an English language newspaper owned by the Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China, on the print and online editions. Although the header to the online "China Watch" section included the text "A Paid Supplement to The Washington Post," James Fallows of The Atlantic suggested that the notice was not clear enough for most readers to see.[124] Distributed to the Post and multiple newspapers around the world, the "China Watch" advertising supplements range from four to eight pages and appear at least monthly. According to a 2018 report by The Guardian, "China Watch" uses "a didactic, old-school approach to propaganda."[125]
In 2020, a report by Freedom House, "Beijing's Global Megaphone," was also critical of the Post and other newspapers for distributing "China Watch".[126][127] In the same year, thirty-five Republican members of the U.S. Congress wrote a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice in February 2020 calling for an investigation of potential FARA violations by China Daily.[128] The letter named an article that appeared in the Post, "Education Flaws Linked to Hong Kong Unrest," as an example of "articles [that] serve as cover for China’s atrocities, including...its support for the crackdown in Hong Kong."[129] According to The Guardian, the Post had already stopped running "China Watch" in 2019.[130]
CNN has often been the subject of allegations of partybias. In research conducted by the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University and the Project for Excellence in Journalism, the authors found disparate treatment by CNN of Republican and Democratic candidates during the earliest five months of the presidential primaries in 2007: "The CNN programming studied tended to cast a negative light on Republican candidates—by a margin of three-to-one. Four-in-ten stories (41%) were clearly negative while just 14% were positive and 46% were neutral. The network provided negative coverage of all three main candidates with McCain fairing the worst (63% negative) and Romney fairing a little better than the others only because a majority of his coverage was neutral. It's not that Democrats, other than Obama, fared well on CNN either. Nearly half of the Illinois Senator's stories were positive (46%), vs. just 8% that were negative. But both Clinton and Edwards ended up with more negative than positive coverage overall. So while coverage for Democrats overall was a bit more positive than negative, that was almost all due to extremely favorable coverage for Obama."[1] In September 2009, a Pew Research Poll showed that Democrats were much more likely than Republicans to rate the network favorably, while Republicans were much more likely than Democrats to see CNN unfavorably.[2]
From the video in the link you provided in post #25. Navarro is discussing the audit with Bannon. The chart shows the total of "Possible Illegal Votes" at 601,130.
The biggest category (305,701, or more than half) is titled "Absentee Ballots Cast That Were Requested Before & After Statutory Deadline". What does that mean? If the ballots were requested before the deadline, they may be valid. After the deadline, not.
The previous table, presumably from a day earlier in the audit, said the total of "Possible Illegal Votes" was 254,722. The biggest category had a different title - "Mail-In Ballots Cast By Voters Registered After the Registration Deadline" - and a nice round number of 150,000. If someone tried to add 150k names & addresses to the Maricopa County registration rolls after the deadline, I think it would have been noticed.
I'm all for strengthening voter integrity laws. But I want to see the fraud up close with my own eyes. We need to pinpoint exactly where it's coming from in order to stop it.
the suspect is black. explain that in non-racist terms. we'll wait.
the big question is... will the black suspect be charged with a hate crime??? the money says no. I'd be shocked if he was.
most of the attacks on asians are from blacks. this is the fact media leaves out on purpose.
if they don't charge him with a hate crime, then there needs to be a lawsuit on the constitutionality on the hate crime laws. its used only on white people. I've not seen one used against a minority or other ethnic group.
From the video in the link you provided in post #25. Navarro is discussing the audit with Bannon. The chart shows the total of "Possible Illegal Votes" at 601,130.
The biggest category (305,701, or more than half) is titled "Absentee Ballots Cast That Were Requested Before & After Statutory Deadline". What does that mean? If the ballots were requested before the deadline, they may be valid. After the deadline, not.
The previous table, presumably from a day earlier in the audit, said the total of "Possible Illegal Votes" was 254,722. The biggest category had a different title - "Mail-In Ballots Cast By Voters Registered After the Registration Deadline" - and a nice round number of 150,000. If someone tried to add 150k names & addresses to the Maricopa County registration rolls after the deadline, I think it would have been noticed.
I'm all for strengthening voter integrity laws. But I want to see the fraud up close with my own eyes. We need to pinpoint exactly where it's coming from in order to stop it.
The margin in Az, Nevada and Georgia was around 10,000 votes. They would find that easily with forensic audits in those states. Wisconsin was 20,000. That too is an easy one. Throw in the hanky panky with the machines and who knows what will come out? Why are the Dems fighting so hard if nothing to hide? Why are Ducey and Kemp fighting so hard? Because they have something to hide. Our elections have to be cleaned up. The US should have zero tolerance for fraud. ZERO.you just can’t say it happens and shrug your shoulders. So don’t believe the WSJ when they say there isn’t widespread election fraud. Conduct forensic audits and let the chips fall where they may. So you can see with your own eyes.
Dating back to 2011, The Washington Post began to include "China Watch" advertising supplements provided by China Daily, an English language newspaper owned by the Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China, on the print and online editions. Although the header to the online "China Watch" section included the text "A Paid Supplement to The Washington Post," James Fallows of The Atlantic suggested that the notice was not clear enough for most readers to see.[124] Distributed to the Post and multiple newspapers around the world, the "China Watch" advertising supplements range from four to eight pages and appear at least monthly. According to a 2018 report by The Guardian, "China Watch" uses "a didactic, old-school approach to propaganda."[125]
In 2020, a report by Freedom House, "Beijing's Global Megaphone," was also critical of the Post and other newspapers for distributing "China Watch".[126][127] In the same year, thirty-five Republican members of the U.S. Congress wrote a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice in February 2020 calling for an investigation of potential FARA violations by China Daily.[128] The letter named an article that appeared in the Post, "Education Flaws Linked to Hong Kong Unrest," as an example of "articles [that] serve as cover for China’s atrocities, including...its support for the crackdown in Hong Kong."[129] According to The Guardian, the Post had already stopped running "China Watch" in 2019.[130]
CNN has often been the subject of allegations of partybias. In research conducted by the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University and the Project for Excellence in Journalism, the authors found disparate treatment by CNN of Republican and Democratic candidates during the earliest five months of the presidential primaries in 2007: "The CNN programming studied tended to cast a negative light on Republican candidates—by a margin of three-to-one. Four-in-ten stories (41%) were clearly negative while just 14% were positive and 46% were neutral. The network provided negative coverage of all three main candidates with McCain fairing the worst (63% negative) and Romney fairing a little better than the others only because a majority of his coverage was neutral. It's not that Democrats, other than Obama, fared well on CNN either. Nearly half of the Illinois Senator's stories were positive (46%), vs. just 8% that were negative. But both Clinton and Edwards ended up with more negative than positive coverage overall. So while coverage for Democrats overall was a bit more positive than negative, that was almost all due to extremely favorable coverage for Obama."[1] In September 2009, a Pew Research Poll showed that Democrats were much more likely than Republicans to rate the network favorably, while Republicans were much more likely than Democrats to see CNN unfavorably.[2]
Says who? You? Prove what the article they posted is false? Have they’ve lost lawsuits like NYT, WAPO, CNN? I’m sure you regard those as credible yeah? That’s why you’re in a deep sleep. TGP isn’t far right, just the anti MSM. All you have is attacking the messenger, not the message. Predictable.
with the record of the nyt, wapo and cnn et al
they, in a fair world, should be banned from twitter and facebook for disinformation
