Election fraud? What election fraud?

[bambino]

Tip of the iceberg


https://api.parler.com/l/nHDZk

[rexdutchman]

Oh no mr bill drip drip drip sadly its to late

[royamcr]

Barr, Trump's protector, said no widespread fraud. That is good enough for me.

[rexdutchman]

Note Barr was never anything close to"protector"

[bf0082]

its obvious the covid deaths are reducing the voter rolls...

[bambino]

The clean up continues


https://justthenews.com/politics-pol...-after-lawsuit

[nevergaveitathought]

barr said, "To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,"

when you don't investigate, you wont see fraud nor evidence

the Michigan investigation is happening and the fraud is seen

[matchingmole]

Originally Posted by bambino

Tip of the iceberg


https://api.parler.com/l/nHDZk

Jim Hoft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit, one of the dumbest conservative news outlets in America. Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitfart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016.

[the_real_Barleycorn]

Here is the real problem, there has been much anecdotal evidence of election irregularities in many different states; Georgia has video evidence of election watchers being forced out, windows blocked, and ballots recounted but submitted once, and the famous suitcases of mysterious ballots. Nevada has hundreds of fake addresses being found on absentee ballots. Even Idaho (a Trump state), had a 7% difference between absentee ballots and the number of envelopes containing those ballots. We also have the famous trailer full of ballots in Pennsylvania from New York. To answer these ends, we are having a full forensic recount in Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada. That means the participants do everything including verifying the envelopes, the signatures on the ballots, and then verify the identities of each voter who voted.
So, as to what Barr said; each state can do their own analysis and if they find that there was voter fraud on a significant scale to affect the election then the judge has to decide the appropriate remedy. Most times that does NOT include a new election. A new election costs money and time. It can also be said that an election six months after the fact is not a repeat of the election but an entirely different election. So that is the decision of each state. So Georgia and Arizona decide that there was sufficient voter fraud to change the outcome and a judge decides that a new election must be held. That's two states out of many. Other judges decide that in Nevada, Michigan, and Pennsylvania also decide that there was voter fraud but not enough to warrant an new election or they will not force the state to do a repeat. So the case could be made that even if Georgia and Arizona both flipped to Trump electoral votes it would not affect the outcome of the 2020 election. What would be the real point of having new elections? Almost have to put all the affected states in the basket in one case. That if a preponderance of the evidence indicted sufficient irregularities to change the outcome then all the states involved must have new elections. Then the danger to the power structure would be that Trump would garner enough electoral votes to have him declared the actual winner of the 2020 election. The democrats would challenge based on the idea that a new election is a different election and invalid. So what if a court decided that in the interest of justice Trump must be declared the winner. Of course, every executive order by Biden would be dismissed but what about legislation signed by Biden. How can you call back the trillion some dollars not already spent?
IF this occurred then would do you do about guilty parties? Someone did something illegal. Do you penalize the democrat party with a billion dollar fine? Who goes to prison? I'm sure we'll all hear about the "I was just following orders" defense. What kind of penalty would be appropriate? Exposure and probation? Fine only? Jail time? All of the above?

My opinion is that there were many intentional irregularities and someone should be held responsible criminally. Would it change the outcome of the election? I honestly don't know but we will never find out without a complete investigation.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by matchingmole

Jim Hoft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit, one of the dumbest conservative news outlets in America. Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitfart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016.

Did Deperno release his results are not? Can you refute his results? As usual, people of your ilk attack the messenger without addressing the context. Go back to posting memes and quit wasting your time doing anything else.

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2...o-the-governor

Go ahead, post your toilet meme. You’re good at it.

[bambino]

What’s this cocksucker hiding? He doesn’t own the ballots:

https://creativedestructionmedia.com...2020-election/

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by royamcr

Barr, Trump's protector, said no widespread fraud. That is good enough for me.

So you voted for the demented one totting a fake Black female VP.

I know you're proud for yourself.

Oh, yea. Almost forgot. Thanks for the admission of fraud.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Here is the real problem, ...

Not to debate that issue, but IMO the "real problem" IS:

EVERY DAY when I go out driving I see more than one person passing under a bright red light for which they most often accelerated in excess of the posted speed limit to get through the red light before someone with a green light enters the intersection. Back when "red light" cams were installed most (if not all) of those same people claimed the cams "violated their right of privacy"!

The idiots who find ANY FRAUDULENT behavior with respect to a Presidential election (or even a dog catcher's job) acceptable should be forbidden to vote in any elections for the next 10 cycles at least. They just simply have not demonstrated their mental and emotional wellness to logically participate in such an important event as an election in this country.

And with respect to current events anyone who voted for that demented fool taking up space in the People's House while living off the government tit for another four years ... should reside on the bench an added 5 cycles.

[instfixer]

Originally Posted by bf0082

its obvious the covid deaths are reducing the voter rolls...

Now do you suppose that the majority of these deaths are people that went around unmasked? If so then more Republicans died than Democrats... Maybe THAT flipped the election...

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by instfixer

Now do you suppose that the majority of these deaths are people that went around unmasked? If so then more Republicans died than Democrats... Maybe THAT flipped the election...

No. People who voted and/or supported Trump wear masks so as not to be identified and shot by angry Antifa or BLM mongers. Remember the days when you COULDN'T enter a business WITH a mask on?