Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1
This statement borders on being ridiculously stupid and sticks to being just stupid.
It I kept saying Wimp Dixie is a rapist to people and told them Wimp Dixie won’t get prosecuted and he’ll get away with it. And told those people where Wimp Dixie lived. And told them Wimp Dixie is going to rape again and they should go have a talk with Wimp Dixie to keep him from raping someone else. And those people went and killed Wimp Dixie.
By you asinine ignorant stupid dumb logic, I have zero responsibility because I never told them to kill Wimp Dixie.
Wimp Dixie’s logic and critical thinking seems lacking.
|
Why not just stick to the issue instead of a silly analogy, a "whataboutism".
The issue is, did Trump, as charged, incite an insurrection and give your opinion, legal or otherwise, as to why you believe he did.
Another poster tried to make the point ( and failed ) that if this were a court of law ) Trump would easily be found guilty but 99% of what Democrat Managers presented couldn't be presented in a court of law because it didn't speak to the statutory language of incitement to insurrection. Evidence of a "bad man" prior to the day of the insurrection, most likely, wouldn't be allowed.
Yes, we all know you don't have to prove a crime to impeach but I and many other people including many Senator's, believe you do have to prove a High crime or Misdemeanor, both legal terms.
It is my understanding, I'm sure you'll correct me if you think I'm wrong, "if" this were a legal proceeding, Democrats would have to use statutory language, which in this case would basically limit their argument to, did his speech that day lead to and cause an insurrection since "imminent" is a part of the statutory language.
Or as Democrat would like you to believe, Donald Trump should have been impeached the day he took office before he ever said a word as President. That's what several members of the jury believed and some were honest enough to admit it, some weren't.
