Main Menu |
|
Most Favorited Images |
|
Recently Uploaded Images |
|
Most Liked Images |
|
Top Reviewers |
| cockalatte |
646 |
| MoneyManMatt |
490 |
| Still Looking |
399 |
| samcruz |
399 |
| Jon Bon |
396 |
| Harley Diablo |
377 |
| honest_abe |
362 |
| DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
| Chung Tran |
288 |
| lupegarland |
287 |
| nicemusic |
285 |
| You&Me |
281 |
| Starscream66 |
279 |
| George Spelvin |
265 |
| sharkman29 |
255 |
|
|
Top Posters |
| DallasRain | 70793 | | biomed1 | 63231 | | Yssup Rider | 60927 | | gman44 | 53294 | | LexusLover | 51038 | | offshoredrilling | 48646 | | WTF | 48267 | | pyramider | 46370 | | bambino | 42577 | | CryptKicker | 37215 | | The_Waco_Kid | 37006 | | Mokoa | 36496 | | Chung Tran | 36100 | | Still Looking | 35944 | | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
12-09-2020, 09:53 AM
|
#16
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
You have a big problem with 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
how can one be a judge and be a prosecutor eodem tempore?
|
Do you really want to know? You'll to be able to do 3 things
1 Open a link
2 Read
3 Comprehension
https://reason.com/2020/05/17/why-do...-of-court/?amp
.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 09:56 AM
|
#17
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Do you really want to know? You'll to be able to do 3 things
.
|
if I wanted to play with a prick, I'd play with my own
|
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 10:10 AM
|
#18
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 42,577
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
if I wanted to play with a prick, I'd play with my own
|
His doesn’t work.
|
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 10:45 AM
|
#19
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino
His doesn’t work.
|
looks like his chud is in fine form.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 10:50 AM
|
#20
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
if I wanted to play with a prick, I'd play with my own
|
Hell I knew #3 would be difficult for ya but I had no idea #1 was too! 
Here let me help you're good for nothing little prick.
In fact, the "principal object" of Rule 48(a)'s "leave of court" requirement was not to protect the interests of individual defendants, but rather to guard against dubious dismissals of criminal cases that would benefit powerful and well-connected defendants. In other words, it was drafted and enacted precisely to deal with the situation that has arisen in United States v. Flynn: its purpose was to empower the Judiciary to limit dismissal in cases where the district court suspects that some impropriety prompted the Executive's decision to abandon a case.
.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 01:04 PM
|
#21
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
berating someone who doesn’t have a chance to appeal and doing it outside actual sentencing is appalling and virtually unheard of
|
Says who?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 01:09 PM
|
#22
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
Says who?
|
well I have to admit, I heard professor turley say just about that same thing
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 01:10 PM
|
#23
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,927
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino
His doesn’t work.
|
And you know this because ...
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 01:44 PM
|
#24
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 42,577
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
And you know this because ...
|
Olivia Howard told us and WTF admitted it. Now, quit stalking me.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 03:39 PM
|
#25
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,927
|
Quit your bellyaching, bud. I’ve got every right to post in this thread.
Go pound sand. And the RTM button, love chunks!
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 03:41 PM
|
#26
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino
Olivia Howard told us and WTF admitted it. Now, quit stalking me.
|
I said it didn't work with her. Wouldn't work around your gay ass either.
That be a far cry from it not working. But hey if talking about my dick gets you off....have at it.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 03:44 PM
|
#27
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
I woke before 4 am this morning
surfed the tv channels as I laid there alone
there was tmc with a 1930's "a tale of two cities" starring ronald coleman, an interesting movie and apropos in our world today, so I watched it beginning to end this morning
the left's second favorite revolution of all time (the first favorite occurring in 1917) with its perverted laws passed with retroactive application or acts under no law at all and its kangaroo tribunal
our future, what?
|
No God Damn wonder you're waking up alone! 
.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 03:45 PM
|
#28
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oeb11
Gentlemen above - i agree - Sullivan behaved in a completely 'partial' fashion for the prosecution - as his DPST masters dictated.Sullivan was part of the prosecution team against Flynn - clearly and factually - and not 'impartial' as a Judge should be.
).
|
WTF are you yacking about?
In fact, the "principal object" of Rule 48(a)'s "leave of court" requirement was not to protect the interests of individual defendants, but rather to guard against dubious dismissals of criminal cases that would benefit powerful and well-connected defendants. In other words, it was drafted and enacted precisely to deal with the situation that has arisen in United States v. Flynn: its purpose was to empower the Judiciary to limit dismissal in cases where the district court suspects that some impropriety prompted the Executive's decision to abandon a case.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 03:47 PM
|
#29
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 42,577
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Quit your bellyaching, bud. I’ve got every right to post in this thread.
Go pound sand. And the RTM button, love chunks!
|
Your file is already open. Watch you’re step.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-09-2020, 03:48 PM
|
#30
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 42,577
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
WTF are you yacking about?
In fact, the "principal object" of Rule 48(a)'s "leave of court" requirement was not to protect the interests of individual defendants, but rather to guard against dubious dismissals of criminal cases that would benefit powerful and well-connected defendants. In other words, it was drafted and enacted precisely to deal with the situation that has arisen in United States v. Flynn: its purpose was to empower the Judiciary to limit dismissal in cases where the district court suspects that some impropriety prompted the Executive's decision to abandon a case.
|
WTF are you yapping about. He dismissed the case.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
|
Find Ladies |
|
Hot Women |
|
