abqspencer - yes, the template for Encounter Reports does say,
“general area only”
The templates for Studio, Strip Club, and AMP/Spa Encounters
says the same
My guess is that the template was written for 1 scenario,
then copy & pasted for the rest
It has been shown, by myself & others, that it’s ok
to post a full address in amp reviews
Even better, imo, would be to link an ad,
which usually states the full address, phone number, hours of operation...
helpful info that anyone who takes an interest would likely want
Their ad puts all that in the public domain,
unlike escorts, who need to keep their locations confidential
So, I think it’s ok to post an address or link an ad in a spa review
But, yes, it is also “appropriate” to be much more vague
Nobody said it’s not appropriate
What I said is,
“a review is not an ad. an intersection is not an address”
Maybe some will contend
that a review IS an ad, or intersection IS an address
I did say, at one point, that I thought amp reviews “should” (my bad), imo,
include an address or a link to an ad
That seems to me like a long time ago, now
Since then, I have learned to care less,.....though...
it is obvious to me that I need to care even less
To help make my point, I wrote this review,
as what I consider to be a good example
(it is real & genuine, nothing made up)...
https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2691800
...note the absence of any instructions, illustrations, or gps coordinates
It does include an address. in a later post, I added a link to an ad
It wasn’t that hard!
But, the people have spoken
It seems that some (most?) who are writing reviews in the amp section
prefer to write reviews that are more like this one...
https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2691812
...though, do they really prefer to read that type?
whatever. I no longer care
There are still some here whose input I value
and who value mine
Info still comes out that is useful & helpful
I know it when I see it
I will focus my energy and attention on that
