Opinion: We Must Have Witnesses.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Correct. The Democrats have hated Bolton for a long time. I can't believe they actual think he's a hail Mary.

shows how desperate they are. all they have left is a neocon warhawk that Trump fired. for being a neocon warhawk.



SAD!!!!

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

shows how desperate they are. all they have left is a neocon warhawk that Trump fired. for being a neocon warhawk.



SAD!!!!

If you say so.

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

awwww those poor pussies at the NSC. they think they make foreign policy. well they don't. this is happening because the person who does make foreign policy .. the President is unconcerned with the NSC's "opinions".

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

If you say so.

you have been ..










by TWK.



thank you valued poster!

[eccieuser9500]

SAD.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

SAD.

if yous say so

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Biden or other democrats aren’t on trial.

You want to bet? Where is PissLousy? She knows they are!!!!!

I've heard mice pissing on cotton making noise than she is!!!!!

This case against Trump begs for an "instructed verdict" "on the law"!

I'm relatively sure that Judge Roberts really doesn't need a string of politicians telling him what people were THINKING when their verbal and written statements are clear and concise .... the alleged 'victim" (the Ukrainian "president") has already stated he was not coerced nor was there any "quid pro quo" .... because he had no knowledge than any military aid was "withheld" ....

.... #1 ... Ukraine was already sent military aid (rockets) when they spoke!

BTW: Have any of you LOONS WHINING ABOUT TRUMP actually read the bill AUTHORIZING the PRESIDENT to send military aid to Ukraine!!!!!!!!!!!!

There was NO "MANDATE" to do so ..... even if ShitFace says there was.

Did he vote for ACA before he read it also? Like PissLousy!

[rexdutchman]

Yup , no victim , no Quid pro quo no crime = no nothing still and again ^ remember nancy didn't want this at the start and held it forever because she knows it a LOSER

[oeb11]

Remember nazi pelosi and the fascist DPST's - "you must vote to approve the bill to find out what is written in it."

Classic Fascist DPST.


9500 is facing the end of the Fascist DPST fantasy. SAD!

[Jaxson66]

Hypothetically, if Moscow Mitch and the Freedom caucus whitewash the trial with 75% of the voting public calling for witnesses. Their chances of holding the Senate and Oval Office are over.

Moscow Mitch best work from home under security, lots of security. He’s setting the stage for a violent election season, History won’t be kind to that turtle headed mutha fu....

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Hypothetically, if Moscow Mitch and the Freedom caucus whitewash the trial with 75% of the voting public calling for witnesses. Their chances of holding the Senate and Oval Office are over.

Moscow Mitch best work from home under security, lots of security. He’s setting the stage for a violent election season, History won’t be kind to that turtle headed mutha fu....

The 75% of the voting public don't even give a shit anymore. It's the 25% of the Liberal Couch Potatoes like you that are glued to the tube with this bullshit. The sad thing is none of you can comprehend what the hell is even going on.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Hypothetically, if Moscow Mitch and the Freedom caucus whitewash the trial with 75% of the voting public calling for witnesses. Their chances of holding the Senate and Oval Office are over.

Moscow Mitch best work from home under security, lots of security. He’s setting the stage for a violent election season, History won’t be kind to that turtle headed mutha fu....

75% of 1,200 surveyed hardly qualifies as the "voting public". most polls over sample Democrats so they can claim Trump has no support. butt keep believing these rigged polls .. they all predicted Hillary would win. and we all know how that turned out when the "voting public" actually .. voted.


BAHHAHAAAA

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

The 75% of the voting public don't even give a shit anymore. It's the 25% of the Liberal Couch Potatoes like you that are glued to the tube with this bullshit. The sad thing is none of you can comprehend what the hell is even going on.

Sure, that don’t

I don’t give a shit how I’m labeled by you or any other trumpster. I’ll vote for who ever is running against trump. The first Candidate who steps up to the mic and asks China to investigate Ivanka trump, they got my vote.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

75% of 1,200 surveyed hardly qualifies as the "voting public". most polls over sample Democrats so they can claim Trump has no support. butt keep believing these rigged polls .. they all predicted Hillary would win. and we all know how that turned out when the "voting public" actually .. voted.


BAHHAHAAAA

Yes, everyone knows HRC won the popular vote and Putin’s boy won the EC it was in all the papers years ago.

Grab a atta boy from the cult coffer.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Yes, everyone knows HRC won the popular vote and Putin’s boy won the EC it was in all the papers years ago.

Grab a atta boy from the cult coffer.

everyone knows the popular vote does not elect the president directly. there's that pesky thing called the electoral college. of course you leftists think the electoral college should be abolished because it denied both Hilltard and Goretard the White House. here's an example .. right on cue from the left .. Electoral College EVIL!! the founding fathers intended electoral college voters to vote their conscious .. not what the votes say. right!!!!


BAHHAAAAAAAAAA


Why Do We Have an Electoral College Again?

https://news.yahoo.com/why-electoral...164132676.html


The framers of the Constitution, and the states that ratified it, clearly expected electors to vote as they pleased. In Federalist No. 68, Alexander Hamilton wrote that electors would be men “selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass” and “most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations.”


i fail to see how the above paragraph proves this libtard author's point that selected members to the Electoral College are not bound by the will of the very voters they represent and can become "faithless electors"


just more liberal revisionist crap

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

I’ll vote for who ever is running against trump. The first Candidate who steps up to the mic and asks China to investigate Ivanka trump, they got my vote.

So you're encouraging dim-retards to engage in the exact same conduct you've been arguing for months is impeachable??

Got it!!

You just let the mask slip.... your outrage is completely phony.