George Soros Says Facebook is Conspiring to Re-Elect Trump

[Tiny]

Poor Mark Zuckerberg, George Soros is slinging shit again. I used to think Facebook was evil. But if it's conspiring against Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren I might have to reconsider that.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...re-elect-trump

[claudefive]

vs. most us newspapers tv/cable news hollywood . Yeah fuck soros

[lustylad]

When obama used social media effectively during his 2012 re-election he was hailed as a genius.

When trumpy did the same in 2016 it was suddenly a scandal. Instead of a genius, he was called a cheat and accused of stealing the election.

Go figure.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Tiny

Poor Mark Zuckerberg, George Soros is slinging shit again. I used to think Facebook was evil. But if it's conspiring against Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren I might have to reconsider that.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...re-elect-trump

Zuckerberg is a liberal capitalist so he doesn't fit Georgie's NWO agenda of world socialism.

Originally Posted by lustylad

When obama used social media effectively during his 2012 re-election he was hailed as a genius.

When trumpy did the same in 2016 it was suddenly a scandal. Instead of a genius, he was called a cheat and accused of stealing the election.

Go figure.

and Marky Zuckerberg "helped" him by the leftist telling. he took that Russkie ad money! if a trifle on money spent on social media even the current kingpin fagbook can sway an election Democracy is already dead.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Tiny

Poor Mark Zuckerberg, George Soros is slinging shit again. I used to think Facebook was evil. But if it's conspiring against Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren I might have to reconsider that.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...re-elect-trump

Facebook removed my post when I mentioned that they were a vehicle used for spreading lies.

Sores may be on to something...notice Bloomberg News was the source.

Bloomberg would get my vote over Trump.

I wouldn't vot for either Sanders or Warren....or Trump.

[eccieuser9500]

Never been. Never will be on Facebook.

[bb1961]

Originally Posted by WTF

Bloomberg would get my vote over Trump.

I wouldn't vot for either Sanders or Warren....or Trump.

You quote:
"Bloomberg would get my vote over Trump."
Then in your infinite wisdom you quote:
"I wouldn't vot for either Sanders or Warren....or Trump."
You don't even realize what you say GENIUS...

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by lustylad

When obama used social media effectively during his 2012 re-election he was hailed as a genius.

When trumpy did the same in 2016 it was suddenly a scandal. Instead of a genius, he was called a cheat and accused of stealing the election.

Go figure.

Bingo.

Here's the problem with these social media companies: they depend on ad revenue. There's only so much they can do to vet ads before they are on the platform. And they only want to do so much. The Dims and others are crying about Republicans and conservatives and others using "their" platform. It borders on a 1A issue.

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by WTF

Facebook removed my post when I mentioned that they were a vehicle used for spreading lies.

Sores may be on to something...notice Bloomberg News was the source.

Bloomberg would get my vote over Trump.

I wouldn't vot for either Sanders or Warren....or Trump.

My concern with Bloomberg is that he, like the other Democratic candidates, wants to shut down the USA oil and gas industry. Otherwise I think he'd make a good president, especially if at least one of the houses of Congress were controlled by Republicans. Well, depending on how it shakes out, we may end up voting for the same person again. Gary Johnson was by far the best candidate last time around, too bad he didn't have a chance.

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Bingo.

Here's the problem with these social media companies: they depend on ad revenue. There's only so much they can do to vet ads before they are on the platform. And they only want to do so much. The Dims and others are crying about Republicans and conservatives and others using "their" platform. It borders on a 1A issue.

Yeah, you can blame Facebook for causing people to waste enormous amounts of time behind a computer but saying they favor one party or the other doesn't make a lot of sense. They've done their best to keep foreign government agents off their site.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by bb1961

You quote:
"Bloomberg would get my vote over Trump."
Then in your infinite wisdom you quote:
"I wouldn't vot for either Sanders or Warren....or Trump."
You don't even realize what you say GENIUS...

Not sure wtf your mental issues are but to recap....I'd never vote for Warren. Sanders or Trump.

Is that too difficult to fucking understand?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Tiny

Yeah, you can blame Facebook for causing people to waste enormous amounts of time behind a computer but saying they favor one party or the other doesn't make a lot of sense. They've done their best to keep foreign government agents off their site.

If a platform can spread lies as gospel we're fucked.

What next....having white supremacists spreading lies about their superiority?

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by WTF

If a platform can spread lies as gospel we're fucked.

What next....having white supremacists spreading lies about their superiority?

You've got to weigh against freedom of speech, which is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. Who's going to decide what's a lie? Are the Republicans going to censor the Democrats and vice versa, depending on which party is in power? Do we want to be like China or Cuba? That's a dangerous road to go down.

[oeb11]

Originally Posted by WTF

If a platform can spread lies as gospel we're fucked.

What next....having white supremacists spreading lies about their superiority?

What is : Fascist DPST's smug, self-entitled spread Lies as Gospel!!!!

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by WTF

If a platform can spread lies as gospel we're fucked.

...

Or, they can just ban you again.