Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
649 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
397 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
280 |
George Spelvin |
265 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70796 | biomed1 | 63347 | Yssup Rider | 61052 | gman44 | 53297 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48683 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 42793 | CryptKicker | 37223 | The_Waco_Kid | 37171 | Mokoa | 36496 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
12-22-2019, 04:06 PM
|
#136
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,927
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
It's regrettable that you failed to educate yourself to a level at which you could comprehend all those "big" words I publish. You might learn something of value. Never misinterpret thoughtful, reasoned hesitancy to engage a fool in a discussion they are not qualified to join .... as having anything to do with "fear"!
That would be you: the fool. You really need to stay on the porch.
|
Big words don't mean anything when you know the value of nothing. I take your " thoughtful, reasoned hesitancy to engage" as a sign you have no place of footing.
I see now not fear, but caution.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-22-2019, 11:00 PM
|
#137
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 29, 2015
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 982
|
Pelosi kinda screwed the pooch here. If/When the trial starts, the Senators are all sworn in as jurors. They have to stay in town six days a week and are not allowed to speak out in public during the trial. IF this happens, then all of the candidates who are Senators are taken off the campaign trail for as long as the trial is going on. So, Pelosi can't and wont' (in my opinion) pass them over until after the DNC convention in July, and them only maybe...depending on who the nominee is. Which is likely to be Bloomberg since he will be able to fund the DNC, which is broke right now and can't raise enough money to surpass its expenses. It will be a Hillary Clinton flashback in that sense.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-22-2019, 11:16 PM
|
#138
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,927
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwill832
Pelosi kinda screwed the pooch here. If/When the trial starts, the Senators are all sworn in as jurors. They have to stay in town six days a week and are not allowed to speak out in public during the trial. IF this happens, then all of the candidates who are Senators are taken off the campaign trail for as long as the trial is going on. So, Pelosi can't and wont' (in my opinion) pass them over until after the DNC convention in July, and them only maybe...depending on who the nominee is. Which is likely to be Bloomberg since he will be able to fund the DNC, which is broke right now and can't raise enough money to surpass its expenses. It will be a Hillary Clinton flashback in that sense.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-22-2019, 11:32 PM
|
#139
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
e95000, u saying... "say what?"
I think Pussolini over played her hand.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-22-2019, 11:56 PM
|
#140
|
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 7, 2019
Location: North
Posts: 3,942
|
Did you boys actually think this would be resolveds before Christmas? Yous are sure acting like you do. Just asking for someone who gives a fucks.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-23-2019, 12:06 AM
|
#141
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Nov 19, 2019
Location: Katy,Tx
Posts: 182
|
Dems think they are exposing Presisent Trump, when they're actually really exposing their own selves, I agree, If Trump did violate highs crimes or whatever then he deserves to be impeached, Dems don't have a tight case against Trump, I feel sorry for democratic voters, their representitives arent serving the voters, or as the saying goes, "what have you done for me lately" if the dems had an airtight case, they would most certainly push forward to have Trump removed, "this too will pass", drain the swamp.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
12-23-2019, 08:34 AM
|
#142
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
|
I still haven't heard the CRIMES , ????
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
12-23-2019, 08:56 AM
|
#143
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
|
And Still no answer
We are in the weeds , 3 questions the LSM has forgot about ?
1) IF there was a Quid pro quo was that illegal ?
2) Why are all the "witnesses " (3 hand opinions) disgruntled employees or fired ?
3) Hunters dealings ?
That's the whole base of the investigation
Funny how simple question are to difficult for the Distortion of fact fairy tales
And abuse of power really talk about distortion of facts ,,,,,
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
12-23-2019, 09:04 AM
|
#144
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
1 No but it is impeachable concerning the President.
It is illegal if any other government official does it....for an example look where the former Governor of Illinois resides because he was peddling a Quid pro quo for Obama's former Senate seat.
2 Because Trump will not let the other witnesses testify.
3 Hunter , there has been nothing illegal with Ukraine and Hunter. Rudy is supposed to be finding some shit but so far...nothing but teasers from Rudy.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-23-2019, 09:07 AM
|
#145
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
|
Apologist for biden
Accusor of Trump who did not do what Biden admitted he did.
DPST's live in a fantasy land devoid of Facts due to their TDS and hatred of anything not of their DPST narrative.
Merry Christmas, ftw!
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|