Encounter: Worst Experience with Yuna at Luxury

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by dfwseeker

No wonder! Now I get it after reading through the threads of posts, and now I know whose reviews are fake.

yeah, you get it, LOL.. you write a totally fake review, your very first ever full-AMP review, and you "get it", because a fake handle with 2 total posts, an obvious shill handle follows you with more Bullshit.

you are not cut out for "real" AMPS.. go beat off at your favorite Jack-Shack, and leave the real Spas out of your anti-promotional efforts.

[Ronin3]

I’d like to see age eliminated from reviews. Theirs is no more relevant than mine. We’re here for quality of session....and aesthetic, which is generally subjective. So it’s pointless to bicker over it. There was a well known provider here that was frequently age estimated in her 20’s. She was universally appreciated but still arguments ensued over age stated in reviews. As an experiment I showed a picture she sent me to 10 friends. Their age estimates ranged from 28-35. She was 52 at the time. There’s too much bickering here over superfluous bs. There’s plenty of times sessions don’t match up with reviews. It’s not the end of the world. Move on. I’d like to see personal attacks on posters and providers result in banning. A accurate review describing an unsatisfactory session and a No should be sufficient.

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by Ronin3

I’d like to see age eliminated from reviews. Theirs is no more relevant than mine. We’re here for quality of session....and aesthetic, which is generally subjective. So it’s pointless to bicker over it. There was a well known provider here that was frequently age estimated in her 20’s. She was universally appreciated but still arguments ensued over age stated in reviews. As an experiment I showed a picture she sent me to 10 friends. Their age estimates ranged from 28-35. She was 52 at the time. There’s too much bickering here over superfluous bs. There’s plenty of times sessions don’t match up with reviews. It’s not the end of the world. Move on. I’d like to see personal attacks on posters and providers result in banning. A accurate review describing an unsatisfactory session and a No should be sufficient.

totally agree. I know who you are describing, I will leave that discussion in the past, where it deserves to stay, but yeah, age is too-often weaponized by guys who are bent on destroying a Provider or her Spa. that is the first thing the Bull shitters reach for, a ridiculously false age report. in Yuna's case, there is a concerted effort to attack her, each poster has been discredited. all the previous reviews had been laudatory. guys with agenda's to destroy see the great reviews, and counter with absurd Bull Shit. so many fake handles lay dormant, never posting until they see the time is ripe to go in and destroy. obvious second, third, whatever handles from "Hater" handles that are continually banned.. PeterBota, HSL, etc.. a good step would be to systematically purge all handles that have not posted in 30 days.. the lie-in-wait Bullshit Shill handles. the Dude who "authored" this Fake review had 13 whole posts in 7 1/2 years on ECCIE! his Bullshit responder has 2, that one signed up last January. complete Frauds, ECCIE needs to clean house.

[Ronin3]

I wish they would. And put in restraints to make this a more amicable site.

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by Ronin3

I’d like to see age eliminated from reviews. Theirs is no more relevant than mine. We’re here for quality of session....and aesthetic, which is generally subjective. So it’s pointless to bicker over it. There was a well known provider here that was frequently age estimated in her 20’s. She was universally appreciated but still arguments ensued over age stated in reviews. As an experiment I showed a picture she sent me to 10 friends. Their age estimates ranged from 28-35. She was 52 at the time. There’s too much bickering here over superfluous bs. There’s plenty of times sessions don’t match up with reviews. It’s not the end of the world. Move on. I’d like to see personal attacks on posters and providers result in banning. A accurate review describing an unsatisfactory session and a No should be sufficient.

Although I hope age stays in the reviews you experience confirms my point on ages - these ladies are much older than described, usually.

[dfwseeker]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

yeah, you get it, LOL.. you write a totally fake review, your very first ever full-AMP review, and you "get it", because a fake handle with 2 total posts, an obvious shill handle follows you with more Bullshit.

you are not cut out for "real" AMPS.. go beat off at your favorite Jack-Shack, and leave the real Spas out of your anti-promotional efforts.

People (except for some handles that promote turnoffs to hot entertainers) know what I talk about.

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by dfwseeker

People (except for some handles that promote turnoffs to hot entertainers) know what I talk about.

they do, huh?

you have barely talked at all in 8 /1/2 years here.. 13 posts until you wrote this hit piece.. now all of a sudden you are loquacious, at least in this Horseshit thread.

[DunnJackNoff]

I will weigh in on this ...reluctantly. I have no agenda at all here but I have seen Yuna and did an honest review on her. I felt like the reviews I read prior to my visit were a lot of hype and very misleading. She is definitely not as attractive as some posters have indicated. She is not 57 but she is also not 25. I would guess her to be somewhere in the middle of those numbers. She puts forth great effort but her lower body flaws-which have been described by some as “surgery gone wrong” and mostly her cigarette breath (which no one else has even mentioned) turned me off. But she sure does a killer TUMA.