Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 267
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70799
biomed163389
Yssup Rider61090
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48713
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42893
The_Waco_Kid37233
CryptKicker37224
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-14-2019, 06:12 PM   #16
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Less than 5% of the US populace understands "quid pro quo". That's why today Nervous Nancy changed her talking point to "bribery."

Nancy also said today "All roads lead to Putin" which is a ludicrous charge. And meaningless. President Trump is President. He's got to deal with the second most powerful man on the planet.

These statements tell me nothing meaningful happened today.

Trump left for another big rally. Dim need to start getting nervous. Bloomberg isn't going to save them.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 06:18 PM   #17
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
Therefore the Impeachment hearing of Donald Trump is no longer valid.



WTF is offline   Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 06:20 PM   #18
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
for once i'm actually going to reply to one of your troll posts. because you are right. this is nothing more than a stunt to swing voter opinions .. and it's failing. it.
We will not know until Nov 0f 2020

WTF is offline   Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 06:23 PM   #19
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

We will not know until Nov 0f 2020


A sensible post - is wtf running out of impeachmints????
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 06:36 PM   #20
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oeb11 View Post
We will not know until Nov 0f 2020


A sensible post - is wtf running out of impeachmints????
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 06:59 PM   #21
Unique_Carpenter
Chasing a Cowgirl
 
Unique_Carpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 19, 2013
Location: West Kansas
Posts: 31,565
Encounters: 89
Default

To Summarize:
.
Unique_Carpenter is offline   Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 07:30 PM   #22
Redhot1960
Valued Poster
 
Redhot1960's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 11, 2019
Location: United States
Posts: 3,623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
We will not know until Nov 0f 2020
WTF Song or WMB song? "wax my balls", you fuckers are funny!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdUDVP8IdZs
Redhot1960 is offline   Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 09:08 PM   #23
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post



Yep I am laughing too, with Schiff and the Democrats trying to impeach Trump on nothing and your dumb ass trying to validate it, lol. The bottom line, Trump won't be impeached and he'll be reelected in 2020.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 09:15 PM   #24
HedonistForever
Valued Poster
 
HedonistForever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 31, 2019
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 5,667
Default

While the House is no court of law, you can bet the Senate will be. The House is very proud of the fact they they can make up their own rules, anything goes and because Schiff is the chief kangaroo no Republican can stop him from allowing hearsay evidence. In the Senate, if it gets that far, one of the first things that will happen is the federal rules of evidence will apply and nobody, certainly not the first two witnesses will be allowed to say as Taylor put it "I'm just repeating what I heard". Nope, ain't gonna happen.


Another Ukrainian official said today that neither Sonland or anybody else ever mentioned to him a connection between the aid being held up and an investigation being started. Certainly no demand that "dirt be produced or else" in the immortal words of Schitt for brains. How Schiff thinks he is going to get around this testimony and the testimony of Zelinsky, I can't imagine other than to say that of course Zelensky and all the other Ukrainian officials are lying. It also sounds like Sonland next week just might blow yesterdays "bombshell" right out of the water and testify that he never said what Taylor's staff said he did. Then what do they do?


A lawyer was just explaining how the crime of bribery must contain the element of Mens rea


Mens rea (/ˈmɛnz ˈriːə/; Law Latin for "guilty mind") is the mental element of a person's intention to commit a crime; or knowledge that one's action or lack of action would cause a crime to be committed. It is a necessary element of many crimes.
Would an investigation of Biden and son be a crime? Don't think so.

The standard common law test of criminal liability is expressed in the Latin phrase actus reus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, i.e. "the act is not culpable unless the mind is guilty".[1]:113 In jurisdictions with due process, there must be both actus reus ("guilty act") and mens rea for a defendant to be guilty of a crime (see concurrence). As a general rule, someone who acted without mental fault is not liable in criminal law.


The lawyer was explaining that while asking for an investigation of Biden to be used solely for purposes of the 2020 election might be construed as a crime, what if the purpose of Trump asking was in his mind solely tied to the 2016 election which is constantly on his mind with evidence being that he actually thinks that Ukraine ( whether they were or not ) was responsible for the hacking and not the Russians. Further prove can be seen in the phone call when Trump mentions the 2016 election. Trumps defense could argue that the 2016 election is all Trump had in mind and perhaps Biden had something to do with it. How is the prosecution going to prove that isn't the case? Point being, this will be so muddied up that no Republican Senator, not even Mitt Romney will vote to convict because bribery will have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt and that's not gonna happen folks.
HedonistForever is offline   Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 09:23 PM   #25
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default Ooops! Schitty got shit on again.

.

Quote:
Ukrainian Minister: Sondland Never Linked Military Aid To A Biden Investigation

Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko said Thursday that the U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland didn’t link military aid to the country to the opening of an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden over his son’s paid board position with an allegedly corrupt Ukrainian gas company, while his father was working with the country diplomatically, reported by Interfax Ukraine.

(Sara Carter)
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 11:20 PM   #26
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
Yep I am laughing too, with Schiff and the Democrats trying to impeach Trump on nothing and your dumb ass trying to validate it, lol. The bottom line, Trump won't be impeached and he'll be reelected in 2020.
He will be impeached.


All it takes is a simple majority in the House.

Next year we will know if Trump gets reelected or not. If the market is trending down...I doubt he will be reelected.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 11:48 PM   #27
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HedonistForever View Post


The lawyer was explaining that while asking for an investigation of Biden to be used solely for purposes of the 2020 election might be construed as a crime, what if the purpose of Trump asking was in his mind solely tied to the 2016 election which is constantly on his mind with evidence being that he actually thinks that Ukraine ( whether they were or not ) was responsible for the hacking and not the Russians. Further prove can be seen in the phone call when Trump mentions the 2016 election. Trumps defense could argue that the 2016 election is all Trump had in mind and perhaps Biden had something to do with it. How is the prosecution going to prove that isn't the case? Point being, this will be so muddied up that no Republican Senator, not even Mitt Romney will vote to convict because bribery will have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt and that's not gonna happen folks.
So Trump's defense is that he is such a dumbass that he believed that Ukraine was responsible for 2016 interference and not Russia?

You want folks to believe that he brought up Biden because of the 2016 election that Biden was not running in and has nothing to do with the 2020 election that Biden is running in. Trump and his followers are so believable....











WTF is offline   Quote
Old 11-15-2019, 01:08 AM   #28
bb1961
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 7,109
Default

And by default they will elect which every clown on the left get the nod...and you the "Liberaltarian" will dutifully vote for since they have all the hallmarks of your ideology. GOTCHA
Makes perfect WTF's NONsense!!
bb1961 is offline   Quote
Old 11-15-2019, 07:10 AM   #29
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
The Impeachment Hearing resembled an SNL political skit. The two star witnesses Kent and Ambassador Taylor presented nothing but "Hear Say" testimony. Then Congressman Quigley who tried to sell the stupid idea that Hearsay is better than direct evidence, apparently this idiot isn't knowledgeable enough to know that "Hearsay" isn't admissible in a court of Law. All in all the hearing was nothing but a chattering class of dipshits on the part of every Democrat present. These people are truly a laughing stock.
did some research on this.



hearsay evidence is not allowed in federal courts, however, state courts may allow hearsay evidence. it goes into a category called "circumstantial" evidence. I think that is where quigley is coming from.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 11-15-2019, 07:59 AM   #30
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly View Post

I'm not a lawyer but my guess is that you lead off with your best witness.
#1: The last three years has been about Dumbocrats' headlines that are nothing more than their assessment that the U.S. LEGAL voters are mindless deplorables who cannot evaluate facts in order to draw conclusions so the Dumbocrats announce the results for them, sometimes before the FACTS are discussed. The Nazis called it PROPOGANDA.... and of course with respect to their alleged FACTS they are "top secret" and cannot be disclosed even in a hearing to unseat a POTUS.

#2: Today, there is more attention focused on an NFL helmet attack than the school attack yesterday and the Dumbocrats' Latest Witch Hunt.

#3: PussLousy needs to fire some shallow minded clueless staffers for feeding her bullshit to regurgitate to the media. It sounds like some have handles on Eccie.

#4: With respect to order of witnesses: "It depends." But generally, you are correct in so far as who has the "burden of proof" ..... because a defense tactic can be to refrain from calling any witnesses, which generally prohibits the prosecution from offering any "rebuttal" witnesses who occasionally have the "emotional" appeal. In this proceeding it would seem the proper tactic would be to present the best and most explosive witness first to set the tone and thereby taint the minds of the spectators and the media who, like so many foolish posters on here, pretend they know what people really meant to say or what the witnesses were thinking ...

... like someone listening to someone talk on a cell phone riding in a car (or eating in a restaurant), but could also here what the person on the other end of the call was saying AND THINKING!
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved