Encounter: Sarah: not working for me

[afterdark1971]

Originally Posted by Ed Highlight

Tekster, after you get "dinged" for dredging up a 5 month old review thread, you should probably focus your search on a lady that elicits a more positive response. Right now, it looks like this lady is a 50-50 proposition, at best. Remember, everybiody is YMMV... everybody!

Do you feel lucky...well, do ya'?? - Dirty Harry 1971

Added no value and bumped an old thread...batting a thousand as our least valuable poster of the year.... my old eyes and surfing this on my phone last night = missed it was a bumped thread.
And good point Ed...ymmv always...what one will do for me might not for you... Im pretty sure that i wouldn't be able to talk this one into a kiss lol. Let. DD get this one from here

[DenTek]

Originally Posted by afterdark1971

I have higher expectations for a provider.... Just because shes hot...her ass cant stink... I also look for GFE that can keep my interest for an hour...
So if your nose dont work and you just want a quick fuck...she might be a yes for you... that just tells me any reviews you do i will have to take with a grain of salt because you are exhibiting lower standards than I have.
To clarify....if there is a regular I see and have a solid relationship with gets a ridiculous bad review on performance or cash and dash.... Ive just quit seeing her...thats normally signs of a downward spiral that i wont facilitate...

Originally Posted by afterdark1971

The review clearly states...smoker...She is conciderate of not lighting up if it bothers you.... I don't have good sense of smell to tell you if her apartment smells like smoke... Not a concern for me...but put it out there for ya.

I appreciate all the input. Like you said AD nothing of value came from the post.

[Corvette17]

BlAh Blah bblah blaha

[Hobby1751]

I saw this Sarah a year or so ago, in a Lansingburgh-area apartment. (She is NOT to be confused with Sarah Summers. I think the Sarah name should be retired for Ms. Summers, same way Jackie Robinson's #42 has been retired. No need to confuse Ms. Summers with imposter Sarah's like this one.)

Anyways, Imposter Sarah was a disappointment. She was attractive, but super-uber-rushed mediocre service. Completely unsatisfying and empty. Wham-bam-done-bye "oh, and can you give me a ride back." Yes, we used someone else's apartment and bedroom? Everything about the encounter was off. I wouldn't recommend her, nor bother giving her a second chance to fleece me. She was friendly enough, and attractive enough, but not a worthwhile service provider. She's been around for years and should know better by now.

[OldGuy59]

I guarantee this is NOT Sarah Summers! Just saw Ms Summers again the other day and she was ber her old sweet, beautiful, wild self! Can't get enough of her!

[DDarkness]

Should have been closed after the bump and posters after it ...

DD