Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 400
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70822
biomed163693
Yssup Rider61273
gman4453360
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48821
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37416
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-02-2019, 10:20 PM   #46
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papadee View Post
The issue isn't individual rights, it's how those rights can be regulated. 1st Amendment - can't yell fire, etc. We already know there are regulations on the 2nd. So I don't know why you keep yelling "individual rights" when that wasn't the focus.
The Bill of Rights are indeed referencing INDIVIDUAL rights, and, FYI, there's already a score or more laws regulating the use of a weapon for killing people in a crowded theater. But you loons on the left want to violate the 2nd and 4th Amendment rights of a great number of law abiding American citizens and superciliously pretend you're accomplishing something to assuage your petty egos.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 12:41 AM   #47
eccieuser9500
Valued Poster
 
eccieuser9500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,954
Encounters: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn View Post
no law exists on gun control and you get to write the ultimate legislative package.
REMEMBER: This was the premise of the challenge. The question of "well regulated" is a good one.


Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn View Post
You cannot violate constitutional protections. You cannot deprive people of their property if lawfully owned. You cannot deprive people of any other right without due process.
That is your mission.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
the real issue is sales between private citizens. forcing private citizens to do a background check i don't think will pass constitutional muster based on the 2nd amendment and the constitution itself. you seem to want to ban sales between private citizens or if not require background checks.


Based on the Constitution and 2nd amendment, as interpreted by a Liberal Justice, the law from the very writing would mean, to MY mind's eye, the background checks are part of being "well regulated". Private or commercial gain. FROM THE BEGINNING.

As per the mission impossible. Possibly eliminating the felons and unstable citizens from owning firearms. To a degree of course. You can't predict when someone will snap.
Hindsight is 20/20. No law exists except the Constitution and ammendments.

How do you regulate a private sale? You just make it illegal not to register the new owner before the sale. I think of it like a vehicle. It's just easier to hide the exchange. And it's up to the seller to see it's registered before, not after the sale.


in case you didn't know, all dealers pay a fee to setup at gun shows and private citizens are charged admission. since this is a paid event, you could force private sellers using this event to sell guns to other privates citizens to use the dealers on site to do a background check.


i don't advertise to sell guns on Craigslist or any other method. i don't want to take the risk of someone trying to rob me over it or knowing where i live and that i likely have other firearms along with other valuables that they will come back later and rob my house.

there is also the possibility you are selling to a person who is not legally allowed to own a gun. there is no way to verify that at present. could you insist the buyer meet you at or go to a gun dealer and have them verify the buyer? yeah, and they would likely do it for a small fee. some dealers might even do it for free as a courtesy. but a buyer can refuse that. and it doesn't mean they can't own a firearm.


when i want to sell a gun i own, i value it online and then take it to a gun shop. they'll give you a reasonable price. even pawn shops will buy guns but you'll get a better price from a gun shop. several times i have wanted to replace one gun for another. i find a gun shop that has what i want new or used and i take my current gun there and trade it out. sometimes i even make a few bucks. or pay the difference.
Paragraph structure could be a lot better and more lucid. I was editing quickly and on the fly.
eccieuser9500 is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 12:47 AM   #48
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500 View Post
REMEMBER: This was the premise of the challenge. The question of "well regulated" is a good one.
The notion that the 2nd Amendment states that an individual must belong to the militia to possess a weapon is ass backwards and is therefore emphatically false. The 2nd Amendment states that the militia is dependent on the citizen who already -- as an INDIVIDUAL RIGHT -- possesses a weapon; not vice versa.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 01:14 AM   #49
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA MAGA Trump Gurl
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,416
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500 View Post
REMEMBER: This was the premise of the challenge. The question of "well regulated" is a good one.

then you agree no amount of background checks can prevent such incidents and in fact would infringe on constitutional rights!



Paragraph structure could be a lot better and more lucid. I was editing quickly and on the fly.
i'd support regulating private sales .. under two conditions .. the left abandon any attempt at banning so-called "assault-style weapons" and they reaffirm the 2nd amendment as a fundamental right of lawful citizens to own firearms.



thank you valued grammar nazi .. but i'm not Yssup Rider so don't sweat it
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 03:55 AM   #50
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,667
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RetiredSubmariner View Post
We had an 'Assault Weapon Ban'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federa...lt_Weapons_Ban

"Studies have shown the ban has had little effect in overall criminal activity and firearm homicides while there is tentative evidence that they decrease the frequency of mass shootings"
Beto was talking about the AK-47 and AK-15. Currently it's legal to own them. Didn't the guy at Las Vegas use an AK-47?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/o-rourke-...162932105.html
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 04:05 AM   #51
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,667
Encounters: 1
Default

[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1061750402]since no one owns an assault rifle, problem solved! when will you libtards understand that only full-auto weapons are assault rifles? only police forces and the military have them.

Beto was talking about the AK-47 and the AK-15. The Yahoo article considered these two weapons to be assault weapons. You can take that up with them. Beto would have these two weapons sold back to the government. Considering one of these weapons is commonly used in mass shootings, I think it's good idea. So, since people can own these two types, THE PROBLEM IS NOT SOLVED.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/o-rourke-...162932105.html
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 06:26 AM   #52
themystic
Valued Poster
 
themystic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
I already did the research. Jefferson carried his own abridged copy of the Christian Bible. Jefferson used his influence to have certain louts in the press subjected to legal actions for lying. Everyone knows you're a left wing loon; hence, your feeble lies are being ignored.


You'd be the one not understanding what was wrote because you are being willfully ignorant of the Founding Father's intent and you're ignoring that the whole of the first nine amendments were specifically addressing INDIVIDUAL rights -- not government prerogatives.


The Supreme Court already reexamined the Founding Father's intent and ruled that gun ownership is an INDIVIDUAL right.
Is their anyone left of you that you agree with on anything? Papa had valid points that you refuted with nonsense. I have a Red Flag alert on you for being a loon. Are you still in Pittsburg at Lustys Pajama Party? When you get back please pick up Lollipop Hankering. She's at Lex Lovers crib. They were studying an Ebonics course late last night
themystic is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 08:03 AM   #53
rexdutchman
Valued Poster
 
rexdutchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
Encounters: 22
Default

Very sad , sorry for the families , But here we go again with many failures FBBI, Locals, This nut job called the fbbi and pointed a gun at a neighbor and Nothing ( you would think that when a mental case calls the fbbi they would just may-be SEND some one to talk to this nut,,,
And of course the LSM is blaming everything everyone but the nut , this is the main reason nothing gets done.
rexdutchman is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 08:27 AM   #54
themystic
Valued Poster
 
themystic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rexdutchman View Post
Very sad , sorry for the families , But here we go again with many failures FBBI, Locals, This nut job called the fbbi and pointed a gun at a neighbor and Nothing ( you would think that when a mental case calls the fbbi they would just may-be SEND some one to talk to this nut,,,
And of course the LSM is blaming everything everyone but the nut , this is the main reason nothing gets done.
Rex you are a perpetrator of fake news. I know you are a Russian sympathizer. Give me one example of the Media blaming everyone but the shooter. People like you are the reason this country is so divided. Go back to wherever the fuck you came from. We don't want your kind here. And take Moscow Mitch with you
themystic is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 08:30 AM   #55
Austin Ellen
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 248809
Join Date: Jun 25, 2014
Posts: 5,654
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Shoal Creek already has your number for being a left wing fucking retard. You'll fit right in - don't worry.




Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic View Post
Is their anyone left of you that you agree with on anything? Papa had valid points that you refuted with nonsense. I have a Red Flag alert on you for being a loon. Are you still in Pittsburg at Lustys Pajama Party? When you get back please pick up Lollipop Hankering. She's at Lex Lovers crib. They were studying an Ebonics course late last night
Austin Ellen is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 08:56 AM   #56
the_real_Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
the_real_Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2017
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 5,453
Encounters: 34
Default

[QUOTE=adav8s28;1061751493][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1061750402]since no one owns an assault rifle, problem solved! when will you libtards understand that only full-auto weapons are assault rifles? only police forces and the military have them.

Beto was talking about the AK-47 and the AK-15. The Yahoo article considered these two weapons to be assault weapons. You can take that up with them. Beto would have these two weapons sold back to the government. Considering one of these weapons is commonly used in mass shootings, I think it's good idea. So, since people can own these two types, THE PROBLEM IS NOT SOLVED.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/o-rourke-...162932105.html[/QUOT

Both weapons you cited were semi automatic and not "weapons of war" The term assault weapon is a invention of the left as anything from a rock to a meat Cleaver and a machine gun could be an assault weapon. Actually neither weapon is commonly used in mass shootings. The handgun is more common. The media makes a bigger story out of the other two. Like the Las Vegas shooting...he has many more weapons but we only hear about a couple. The VA tech shooter killed 38 people with handguns. Major Hassan, handguns again.
the_real_Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 09:45 AM   #57
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

You are correct, TWK
Banning Ak-47 and Ar-15 is just a pretext to get the precedent for all weapons banned.

And ony criminals will have them.

Full auto weapons can be owned in the US per the NFA of 1986. never been a crime in the US using a legally transferred NFA weapon.

DPST's don't care - and care less that their gun ban prescription would be completely ineffective at

controlling gun violence by the tiny minority, It is just a pretext for their objective to disarm and thus control the population for Socialism.
Based on false pretexts.

They do not care about facts and protecting the population - only Control!!
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 10:06 AM   #58
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic View Post
Is their anyone left of you that you agree with on anything? Papa had valid points that you refuted with nonsense. I have a Red Flag alert on you for being a loon. Are you still in Pittsburg at Lustys Pajama Party? When you get back please pick up Lollipop Hankering. She's at Lex Lovers crib. They were studying an Ebonics course late last night
Everyone knows your choice in "red flags", Moscow Mystic, and you're a fucking lollipop sucking loon for believing such.

I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 10:16 AM   #59
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA MAGA Trump Gurl
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,416
Encounters: 1
Default

[QUOTE=adav8s28;1061751493]
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
since no one owns an assault rifle, problem solved! when will you libtards understand that only full-auto weapons are assault rifles? only police forces and the military have them.

Beto was talking about the AK-47 and the AK-15. The Yahoo article considered these two weapons to be assault weapons. You can take that up with them. Beto would have these two weapons sold back to the government. Considering one of these weapons is commonly used in mass shootings, I think it's good idea. So, since people can own these two types, THE PROBLEM IS NOT SOLVED.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/o-rourke-...162932105.html


Beto will be president of Venezuela before he will be president of the US.


BAHHAHHAHAHHAAAAAA
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 09-03-2019, 10:19 AM   #60
themystic
Valued Poster
 
themystic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin Ellen View Post
Shoal Creek already has your number for being a left wing fucking retard. You'll fit right in - don't worry.
The Queen of Hate. Right on time. Moscow Ellen hope you find a new manager soon. I just couldn’t keep trying to promote you. There isn’t much on a market for hateful washed up hookers. Be well. Bless your Heart. I’m praying for you
themystic is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved