Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaliLama
|
how many posters here have said exactly this over the years? quite a few yet the deaf dumb and blind
moles don't get it!!
if the solar orbit of Earth was uniform, there wouldn't be seasons as we know it now. how hard is that to understand? there would be one season, year around. the temperature would remain mostly constant with the usual variance of day and night.
that would leave only the solar cycle as the main driver of temperature. the solar cycle is approximately 11 years. we are entering a low cycle of solar sun spot activity, which is exactly what is throwing a monkey wrench into the global warming idiot's so-called
hokey stick graph. and why they had to rename it climate change.
if the solar orbit was uniform, we'd have much less ice at the poles, perhaps even none. since the Earth is already 70% covered by oceans, the land mass would be a lot less. the solar cycles might create then remove ice at the poles but the poles overall would have far less ice than they do under the current circumstances.
man made pollution is only a concern if its gets so bad that it begins to significantly alter the O2 ratio of the atmosphere. and there is no indication that it is now and long term studies show at the current rates of industrial growth it is not a short term concern. losing forest land is a concern, long term, but even if we pave the entire planet with asphalt we have easy ways to generate oxygen. we call them oceans. what is water? hydrogen and oxygen. split it apart and you get two separate gasses .. hydrogen and .. wait for it ... oxygen. problem solved! and when we develop a cost efficient method to convert salt water from the oceans into fresh water then we have nearly unlimited clean drinkable water. so much in fact you could remake Africa and western Australia into green oasis's. two for one sale!!!
