Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) said on Thursday night that his committee’s investigation represented “formal impeachment proceedings” against President Donald Trump.
The House Judiciary chairman also said on CNN that articles of impeachment could be sent to the House floor by the end of the year.
CNN host Erin Burnett asked Nadler about Democrats in the House who may not want to vote for an “impeachment inquiry” but would vote for impeachment itself.
But Nadler suggested it was just a matter of semantics and began to explain his committee’s investigations into Trump.
“In your mind, you’re saying this is exactly the same as what we all call formal impeachment proceedings by another name?” Burnett asked.
“This is formal impeachment proceedings,” Nadler replied, emphasizing the “is.”
He added:
“We are investigating all the evidence, we’re gathering the evidence, and we will at the conclusion of this ― hopefully by the end of the year ― vote articles of impeachment to the House floor, or we won’t. That’s a decision that we’ll have to make. But that’s exactly the process we’re in right now.”
He said articles of impeachment have been drafted, but they may or may not match any final documents that are submitted ― if they are submitted ― at the conclusion of the investigation.
Nadler also offered a timeline of what’s coming next, with witnesses appearing before the committee in September and October:
The House Judiciary Committee does an investigation to determine if there is evidence to warrant bringing the proceeding before the full house.
In your own link it says,
"We are investigating all the evidence, we’re gathering the evidence, and we will at the conclusion of this ― hopefully by the end of the year ― vote articles of impeachment to the House floor, or we won’t. That’s a decision that we’ll have to make. But that’s exactly the process we’re in right now.”
In other news,
"A major impeachment development: Court may order McGahn’s testimony"
Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) said on Thursday night that his committee’s investigation represented “formal impeachment proceedings” against President Donald Trump.
The House Judiciary chairman also said on CNN that articles of impeachment could be sent to the House floor by the end of the year.
CNN host Erin Burnett asked Nadler about Democrats in the House who may not want to vote for an “impeachment inquiry” but would vote for impeachment itself.
But Nadler suggested it was just a matter of semantics and began to explain his committee’s investigations into Trump.
“In your mind, you’re saying this is exactly the same as what we all call formal impeachment proceedings by another name?” Burnett asked.
“This is formal impeachment proceedings,” Nadler replied, emphasizing the “is.”
He added:
“We are investigating all the evidence, we’re gathering the evidence, and we will at the conclusion of this ― hopefully by the end of the year ― vote articles of impeachment to the House floor, or we won’t. That’s a decision that we’ll have to make. But that’s exactly the process we’re in right now.”
He said articles of impeachment have been drafted, but they may or may not match any final documents that are submitted ― if they are submitted ― at the conclusion of the investigation.
Nadler also offered a timeline of what’s coming next, with witnesses appearing before the committee in September and October:
The House Judiciary Committee does an investigation to determine if there is evidence to warrant bringing the proceeding before the full house.
In your own link it says,
"We are investigating all the evidence, we’re gathering the evidence, and we will at the conclusion of this ― hopefully by the end of the year ― vote articles of impeachment to the House floor, or we won’t. That’s a decision that we’ll have to make. But that’s exactly the process we’re in right now.”
In other news,
"A major impeachment development: Court may order McGahn’s testimony"
What's on?
Another effort to get a Fed judge to cross the separation of triumvirate of Admin, Congress and Court?
What amuses me is that the Dim's think they can tie a pretty bow on a package of BS and get a judge to deliver it.
Maybe they need to change the shit to another type, and another, and another, and ...
The House can impeach til "Hell Freezes Over" but remember history, No US President has ever been convicted and removed from office!!! Just another way for the Democrats to waste the American Taxpayers money!!!!