Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
noun
Bitterness or resentfulness, especially when long-standing.
Even in your last post. You couldn't help the tard thing.
Who would you be calling a "tard" after being warned to refrain from rudeness and insults?
And no amount of twisting and deflection will change the fact that subsequent to Mueller's report that many, many Congressional dim-retards are found on the lying side of events, e.g., Adam Shitty, hildebeest, Clapper, Brennan, etc., etc., etc., when they lied to the American people hundreds upon hundreds of times by claiming that Trump colluded with the Russians. Likewise with the lib-retard, lame-stream propaganda organs of lies and deception, e.g., The New York Times, BuzzFeed, CNN, McClatchy, The Washington Post, etc., etc., etc., when they lied to the American people thousands upon thousands of times by claiming that Trump colluded with the Russians. And Barr and Rosenstein ruled there was no "obstruction".
I looked up the phrase “unethical partisan attorney general” in Webster’s dictionary for an accurate definition... and it had a picture of Eric Holder next to the definition. Go figure...
I looked up the phrase “unethical partisan attorney general” in Webster’s dictionary for an accurate definition... and it had a picture of Eric Holder next to the definition. Go figure...
Do you not posses the intellectual capacity to understand what this scene is about?
I'll say it again. The evidence is there. Somebody just doesn't want to prosecute. Passing the buck to Congress.
Yeah, that would be the script Comey followed when he lied about hildebeest's criminality. But unlike a subjective case of "obstruction" of an investigation of a "non-existent crime" being leveled against Trump, hildebeest actually broke the law and obstructed justice:
Quote:
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
There you go again with the tard thing. Keep it up.
Again, who would you be calling a "tard" after being warned to refrain from rudeness and insults?
And, again, no amount of twisting and deflection will change the fact that subsequent to Mueller's report that many, many Congressional dim-retards are found on the lying side of events, e.g., Adam Shitty, hildebeest, Clapper, Brennan, etc., etc., etc., when they lied to the American people hundreds upon hundreds of times by claiming that Trump colluded with the Russians. Likewise with the lib-retard, lame-stream propaganda organs of lies and deception, e.g., The New York Times, BuzzFeed, CNN, McClatchy, The Washington Post, etc., etc., etc., when they lied to the American people thousands upon thousands of times by claiming that Trump colluded with the Russians.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redhot1960
April 21, 2019 at 11:46 am
1 reply 18 retweets 50 likes
Reply 1 Retweet 18 Like 50 Direct message
Kurt Schlichter Retweeted
David Wohl
Verified account
@DavidWohl
1h1 hour ago
More
Replying to @realDonaldTrump
Imagine if Mueller discovered that Trump:
– bleached his email server when it had been subpoenaed.
– destroyed 13 campaign BlackBerry’s with sledge hammers.
– arranged a secret meeting between Giulliani and Bill Barr to “discuss their Grandkids”
You know, REAL CRIMES.
+1
And Barr and Rosenstein ruled there was no "obstruction".
We all know that Trump and his supporters are Un American liars. Trump defends Putin over our own country's intelligence agencies. He wont be around much longer. The trash always eventually gets taken out
According to the report, Russia 'interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion'.
That’s in the first few pages of volume one regarding conspiracy. That’s been made clear as a bell. Hell, Giuliani is stating its ok to take Russian help because it’s not a crime. All the while the freedumb caucus insists charges should be brought against the Clinton campaign for Ukraine’s work with her foundation.
It’s an attempted cover up, if Barr gets caught lying his days are numbered.
The hugest, biggest, tremendous impeachment of all time.
For two years the Democrats have been on a fishing expedition to bring down a lawfully elected president. They got skunked and reeled in no evidence to support their accusation that Trump colluded with Russia to defeat Hillary.
Their boat enjoyed a high tide of hope and momentum for two years, but after the Mueller Report was released, that tide went out. All the way out. Now they’re stuck in the mud and they all look ridiculous. Do they abandon their boat and trudge back to the shore of apology? No. Most of them are tripling down on their lunacy. They’re now threatening impeachment based on ‘obstruction,’ even though there’s no proof of that, either. Maybe Trump gritting his teeth at their witch-hunt qualifies as obstruction.
The tide is rushing back in, but this time it’s a tidal wave in Trump’s favor. What the Deep State operatives did to him is nothing short of treason and they must be held accountable. LOCK THEM UP!
I'll say it again. The evidence is there. Somebody just doesn't want to prosecute. Passing the buck to Congress.
I'll say it again. Try to follow.
1. There was no "collusion" or "conspiracy" or whatever your want to call it.
2. How do we know? Because Mueller said so!
3. Since there was no underlying crime, Mueller was effectively investigating a non-crime.
4. You can't obstruct "justice" by opposing the investigation of a non-crime. Justice is truly served by halting such a futile and wasteful expenditure of public resources, not by prolonging it!
Now please try to tell me where I am wrong.
P.S. Thanks for the two Woody Allen clips. I enjoyed them, although I have no idea how they fit into this discussion.
Hell, Giuliani is stating its ok to take Russian help because it’s not a crime.
That's a complete distortion. I watched Giuliani on Meet the Press this morning. He frustrated and demolished Chuck Todd. The way you and the left are spinning what Guiliani said is shameful and deceitful and pernicious.
Was it ok for the NY Times to publish the Pentagon Papers in 1971? The Supreme Court said yes. They didn't steal the papers, they published what was stolen by someone else. And that involved classified material, not campaign chatter.
When Wikileaks tossed all those DNC/John Podesta emails into the public domain, was the media "taking Russian help" to boost their readership/viewership by reporting it? Was that a crime?
Of course trump hammered home the embarrassing disclosures on the campaign stump! What was he supposed to do, ignore them?
Just like hildebeest hammered home that "grab em by the pussy" tape! You remember... the one she colluded with NBC/ABC to timely release for maximum embarrassment 3 weeks before Election Day? Why don't we spend $35 million investigating how that happened?
So what's it gonna be, Jaxson?
Do you want to argue the SCOTUS erred in its Pentagon Papers decision?
P.S. Thanks for the two Woody Allen clips. I enjoyed them, although I have no idea how they fit into this discussion.
WITH ALL DO RESPECT: EVEN IF I WANTED TO AND IF THE TWO GIFs FROM THE CASABLANCA MOVIE WERE NOT SUCCESSFUL, I HAVE NO HOPE YOUR COGNITIVE ABILITIES.
The ability for the President to use the Constitution to destroy anyone's claim that this is a nation of laws, and not euphemisms, is the point. You fill in the answer.
P.S. The movie clips are about the law and political stereotypes.
Can you find Hillary's shoe?
