Judge rules Odumbocare unconstitutional

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Odumbocare is laughable, especially considering how Pelosi collected more than $2.3 million total in campaign contributions from pharmaceutical companies since the 2007-08 election cycle.

What is laughable is your one sided slant on people.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by bamscram

What is laughable is your one sided slant on people.

Anyone can see that Pelosi was paid $2.3 million to vote the way she did on Odumbocare. One needn't be a rocket scientist to figure out how one-sided Pelsoi was based on who was paying her. It's laughable how some people are too stupid to see the obvious.

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Anyone can see that Pelosi was paid $2.3 million to vote the way she did on Odumbocare. One needn't be a rocket scientist to figure out how one-sided Pelsoi was based on who was paying her. It's laughable how some people are too stupid to see the obvious.

Do you know what I am laughing about? Or do you just wish to ramble on?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by bamscram

Do you know what I am laughing about? Or do you just wish to ramble on?

Some fools are amused to laughter by the lint they find in their belly buttons, but I'm laughing at dim-retards who are too stupid to see that their politicians who voted for Odumbocare are in the pockets of big pharmaceutical companies.

[Wakeup]

Stop...

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Government programs, like Odumbocare, are always ripe for fraud -- because they're using other people's money and don't really give a fuck.

Certainly it is true that fraud exists in government run programs. One estimate I just read had the welfare fraud rate at 10%. So 90% of the welfare given out is to people who justifiably qualify for it. I don't like the 10% who are scamming the system but I am happy for the 90% of the people, whether "dim-retards" or others, who are able to get some help in a time of need.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Certainly it is true that fraud exists in government run programs. One estimate I just read had the welfare fraud rate at 10%. So 90% of the welfare given out is to people who justifiably qualify for it. I don't like the 10% who are scamming the system but I am happy for the 90% of the people, whether "dim-retards" or others, who are able to get some help in a time of need.

"10% fraud rate per program." Add another program -- e.g., Odumbocare ... and you've added another federal program with a 10% fraud rate.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

"10% fraud rate per program." Add another program -- e.g., Odumbocare ... and you've added another federal program with a 10% fraud rate.

So do you think providing justified welfare to 90% with the knowledge that there is 10% fraud, or should we simply eliminate ALL welfare? Same question for Obamacare. Don't blame the 90% for the crimes of the 10%. My guess is that there are very few among us who have never "cheated" on our income taxes by trying to pay less than we should. Not reporting some income (providers for example). Or inflating itemized deductions.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

So do you think providing justified welfare to 90% with the knowledge that there is 10% fraud, or should we simply eliminate ALL welfare? Same question for Obamacare. Don't blame the 90% for the crimes of the 10%. My guess is that there are very few among us who have never "cheated" on our income taxes by trying to pay less than we should. Not reporting some income (providers for example). Or inflating itemized deductions.

I blame 100% of the politicians who vote for shit programs like Odumbocare for every cent of tax payer money lost to fraud -- especially when they turn around and insist that what they had already taken wasn't enough.

[oeb11]

In a ruling issued Sunday, Justice Reed O'Connor of Ft Worth issued a stay of his decision that the ACA is invalid. He stands by his ruling that the act is invalid and unconstitutional.

This because of "great uncertainty" many Americans would face if the ACA ends abruptly without adequate replacement.

Realisticaly - to allow for DPST appeals from Kalifornia AG Becerra and Congressional

Democrats.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I blame 100% of the politicians who vote for shit programs like Odumbocare for every cent of tax payer money lost to fraud -- especially when they turn around and insist that what they had already taken wasn't enough.

Yes. we all know you are not a fan of Obamacare no matter how many people it has helped gain medical insurance for the first time in their lives. But your original statement went far beyond just Obamacare. It referenced government programs that give some people something for noting. So I ask again -- what about welfare that seems to be 90% effective in delivering money to those who need it?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Yes. we all know you are not a fan of Obamacare no matter how many people it has helped gain medical insurance for the first time in their lives. But your original statement went far beyond just Obamacare. It referenced government programs that give some people something for noting. So I ask again -- what about welfare that seems to be 90% effective in delivering money to those who need it?

Any redistribution of wealth, e.g., Odumbocare, also takes money from those who need it. Odumbocare cost too many their healthcare programs and their doctors.

[Wakeup]

Back on topic...

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by Wakeup

Back on topic...

I have to ask. We are discussing Obamacare's impact on taxpayers and the related issue of ALL programs that impact taxpayers. What is off topic?

[oeb11]

Second SRXXX query.
What is off topic?