Still More Fake News To Slur A Deceased President.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

What say you get back on the fucking topic which is about the NYT posting a FAKE NEWS article to slur a recently deceased president.

Ok. On topic. You say its Fake News. The people who say it isn't are the ones who published it. LEGIT! Bush didn't know what a grocery scanner was. Its ok. This president has never payed a bill. They all are a little out of touch with everyday people

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

Ok. On topic. You say its Fake News. The people who say it isn't are the ones who published it. LEGIT! Bush didn't know what a grocery scanner was. Its ok. This president has never payed a bill. They all are a little out of touch with everyday people

You didn't read the OP did you.

The Daily Wire reported that this NYT piece on Bush41 was FAKE NEWS.

Snopes reported that the NYT was FAKE NEWS.

Subsequently, it was discovered that even WaPo said the NYT piece was FAKE NEWS.

Hence, only pea brain, lib-retarded morons believe that the NYT ISN'T FAKE NEWS.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Snopes reported that the NYT was FAKE NEWS.

So you admit Snoopes is the standard to sniff out erroneous news. Good to know.

https://www.politifact.com/personali...yruling/false/


It will take days to go through all of Trumps lies...

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

So you admit Snoopes is the standard to sniff out erroneous news. Good to know.

https://www.politifact.com/personali...yruling/false/


It will take days to go through all of Trumps lies...

The OP is about the lib-retard media, i.e., the New York Times, continuing to publish FAKE NEWS articles -- lies -- to slur a Republican president -- Bush41 -- even after he is dead.

That ain't got shit to do with Trump, now does it?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The OP is about the lib-retard media, i.e., the New York Times, continuing to publish FAKE NEWS articles -- lies -- to slur a Republican president -- Bush41 -- even after he is dead.

That ain't got shit to do with Trump, now does it?

You brought up Snoopes. Trump is keeping Snoopes busy with all his lies.

You started a thread using a freshly deceased President to bash a news organisation you seem not to care for.

Pretty low blow. I'm suprised TDL hasn't chimed in. He , like I , does not think it the time to use his death for political gain.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

You brought up Snoopes. Trump is keeping Snoopes busy with all his lies.

You started a thread using a freshly deceased President to bash a news organisation you seem not to care for.

Pretty low blow. I'm suprised TDL hasn't chimed in. He , like I , does not think it the time to use his death for political gain.

The Daily Wire introduced Snopes to show what a shitty FAKE NEWS article the NYT published about a recently deceased president -- that was the "low blow".

On such occasions as this, proactive measures are required to nip that shit in the bud early on or else morons with lib-retard leanings will still believe the lie even 26 years after the lie has been refuted.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The Daily Wire introduced Snopes to show what a shitty FAKE NEWS article the NYT published about a recently deceased president -- that was the "low blow".

On such occasions as this, proactive measures are required to nip that shit in the bud early on or else morons with lib-retard leanings will still believe the lie even 26 years after the lie has been refuted.

Nobody on a Hooker Board cares about a 26 year old lie.

You are no better than the NYT by bringing it up.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The Daily Wire introduced Snopes to show what a shitty FAKE NEWS article the NYT published about a recently deceased president -- that was the "low blow".

On such occasions as this, proactive measures are required to nip that shit in the bud early on or else morons with lib-retard leanings will still believe the lie even 26 years after the lie has been refuted.

Thanks for your post IB. That Snopes is a fantastic source to track Trump. I still like The NYT. I still like Bush 41-(God Rest His Body) even though he didn't know what a grocery scanner was. Hell 26 years ago? I might not have known either.Im not sure. That's been a long time ago and most, including me, have moved on. It is funny though. Did he know what a bar code was LOL!! RIP Mr President

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

Nobody on a Hooker Board cares about a 26 year old lie.

You are no better than the NYT by bringing it up.

Perhaps you missed the part in the OP where its stated that the NYT republished its 26 year old FAKE NEWS lie about Bush41 again just a few days ago. So, its a current event and an example of the partisan bias held by the lame-stream media against Republican politicians --- even after they are dead! Hence, very relevant.

And this is the Political Forum on said hooker board where such topics are discussed by bodies who know what this forum is about.

Originally Posted by themystic

Thanks for your post IB. That Snopes is a fantastic source to track Trump. I still like The NYT. I still like Bush 41-(God Rest His Body) even though he didn't know what a grocery scanner was. Hell 26 years ago? I might not have known either.Im not sure. That's been a long time ago and most, including me, have moved on. It is funny though. Did he know what a bar code was LOL!! RIP Mr President

If you actually troubled yourself to read Snopes more carefully, it says you've been duped and that you're spreading a lie again.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Perhaps you missed the part in the OP where its stated that the NYT republished its 26 year old FAKE NEWS lie about Bush41 again just a few days ago. So, its a current event and an example of the partisan bias held by the lame-stream media against Republican politicians --- even after they are dead! Hence, very relevant.

And this is the Political Forum on said hooker board where such topics are discussed by bodies who know what this forum is about.

]

Yes like I said, you are no better than the NTY's.

Using a death to bash some perceived opponent.

I've even fallen into the trap!

Bash away while he lays in rest...

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

Yes like I said, you are no better than the NTY's.

Using a death to bash some perceived opponent.

I've even fallen into the trap!

Bash away while he lays in rest...

It was the NYTs that chose this moment to bash Bush41 with a FAKE NEWS article. To pretend otherwise is disingenuous BS.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

It was the NYTs that chose this moment to bash Bush41 with a FAKE NEWS article. To pretend otherwise is disingenuous BS.

Why would you bring up a 26 year old story during the death of a great man and public servant like George HW Bush? Pretty disingenuous of the OP during this trying time, in my opinion. Even Trump tried to bury the hatchet with the Bushes. Remember friend, the enemy of my enemy is my friend

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

Why would you bring up a 26 year old story during the death of a great man and public servant like George HW Bush? Pretty disingenuous of the OP during this trying time, in my opinion. Even Trump tried to bury the hatchet with the Bushes. Remember friend, the enemy of my enemy is my friend

Why is it you have such a problem understanding what is clearly posted in the OP about how it was the NYT that dredged up the 26 year old lie about Bush41 and published it as FAKE NEWS upon his death?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

It was the NYTs that chose this moment to bash Bush41 with a FAKE NEWS article. To pretend otherwise is disingenuous BS.

The press coverage has been overwhelming supportive for Bush 41, even in the NYT's.

To whine about this minut matter is what is disingenuous.

I've read mothing about his handsy nature in his latter years, something that is not fake news and that is to the Press's credit.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

The press coverage has been overwhelming supportive for Bush 41, even in the NYT's.

To whine about this minut matter is what is disingenuous.

I've read mothing about his handsy nature in his latter years, something that is not fake news and that is to the Press's credit.

That would be an untrue statement. WaPo couldn't bring itself to proof read the shit they initially posted as an obit for Bush41. The NYT slurred Bush41 with its FAKE NEWS lie. And the AP initially and wholly ignored Bush41's WWII service while highlighting his loss to Slick Willie in 92. Then Slate published an article attacking Bush41's service dog, Sully.