Still More Fake News To Slur A Deceased President.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Actually, this thread disparages WaPo, the NYT and other lame-stream media venues for disparaging Bush41; hence, this thread is in defense of Bush41.

If you think using Bush's death is a proper venue to disparage the NYT or WaPo , then we disagree.

Maybe Bush is just the enemy of your enemy and can be used however...

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Yet another lie created out of thin air. I have not criticized either Bush, and certainly not in the lying manner the farcical NYT has demonstrated over the course of the past three decades. 26 years they've had to correct their lie, but they haven't withdrawn it yet. I challenge you to find such a post where I did anything other than defend Bush43 and especially Bush41.

If they haven't "corrected" their "lie" after 26 years then maybe they dont think its a lie. They are not like Eccie where you can just change peoples words and put FTFY. Your Story and sources were clearly FAKE NEWS. And to do it during a great mans death, well, reeks of politics.

RIP Mr President. Thank you for your Service

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

If you think using Bush's death is a proper venue to disparage the NYT or WaPo , then we disagree.

Maybe Bush is just the enemy of your enemy and can be used however...

Disparaging WaPo and the NYT is an everyday event, but doubly justified when they denigrated Bush41 with Fake News stories to denigrate his presidency.

Originally Posted by themystic

If they haven't "corrected" their "lie" after 26 years then maybe they dont think its a lie. They are not like Eccie where you can just change peoples words and put FTFY. Your Story and sources were clearly FAKE NEWS. And to do it during a great mans death, well, reeks of politics.

RIP Mr President. Thank you for your Service

Even Snopes called the NYT on their lie; so, it would be you who is propagating FAKE NEWS without substantive proof to provide even the flimsiest support for your POV.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Disparaging WaPo and the NYT is an everyday event, but doubly justified when they denigrated Bush41 with Fake News stories to denigrate his presidency.




.

Then let it be an everyday event.... Bush's passing is not an everyday event is my point.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

Then let it be an everyday event.... Bush's passing is not an everyday event is my point.

Disparaging a recently deceased president with "FAKE NEWS" isn't an "every day event", and the lies need to be immediately and vigorously addressed when they occur to keep the lies from taking root in the public's mind one second longer than necessary.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Disparaging WaPo and the NYT is an everyday event, but doubly justified when they denigrated Bush41 with Fake News stories to denigrate his presidency.




Even Snopes called the NYT on their lie; so, it would be you who is propagating FAKE NEWS without substantive proof to provide even the flimsiest support for your POV.

Now I remember that story from 26 years ago. I remember because that's when Bill Clinton beat 41 for president. It was funny 41, RIP, was in a grocery store and didn't know what a grocery scanner was. Talk about out of touch with the peeps. Poor guy.I think they even had a picture to prove it. As I recall a bunch of reporters from various news outlets verified the story. One thing I'm a bit fuzzy on, Wasn't that a grocery store in the Ukrainian capital

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

Now I remember that story from 26 years ago. I remember because that's when Bill Clinton beat 41 for president. It was funny 41, RIP, was in a grocery store and didn't know what a grocery scanner was. Talk about out of touch with the peeps. Poor guy.I think they even had a picture to prove it. As I recall a bunch of reporters from various news outlets verified the story. One thing I'm a bit fuzzy on, Wasn't that a grocery store in the Ukrainian capital

You're regurgitating the FAKE NEWS lie reported by the NYT.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're regurgitating the FAKE NEWS lie reported by the NYT.

Are you citing Snopes as a Reliable source? Those guys are fake news. I offer the following proof

https://www.snopes.com/news/2015/11/...-cheering-911/

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

Are you citing Snopes as a Reliable source? Those guys are fake news. I offer the following proof

https://www.snopes.com/news/2015/11/...-cheering-911/

Even WaPo says the NYT's piece isn't true: hence FAKE NEWS. Only gullible, dim-retard moron's still believe that NYT's FAKE NEWS story is true.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Even WaPo says the NYT's piece isn't true: hence FAKE NEWS. Only gullible, dim-retard moron's still believe that NYT's FAKE NEWS story is true.

So the Washington Post and Snopes are reliable news sources? This is really good info. Ill start using them as my sources to track our current President. Thanks buddy

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

So the Washington Post and Snopes are reliable news sources? This is really good info. Ill start using them as my sources to track our current President. Thanks buddy

Follow Ben Shapiro and the Daily Wire. They'll keep you better informed than either Snopes or WaPo. There are fewer incidents of "Fake News" from the Daily Wire than the NYT. The Daily Wire conscientiously avoided publishing a FAKE NEWS story about Bush41.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Follow Ben Shapiro and the Daily Wire. They'll keep you better informed than either Snopes or WaPo. There are fewer incidents of "Fake News" from the Daily Wire than the NYT. The Daily Wire conscientiously avoided publishing a FAKE NEWS story about Bush41.

Here's one I just found that has Ben Shapiro, The Daily wire and Washington Post. Ill read the Full article later. Finally some NON FAKE NEWS. Thanks Brother

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ne-booth-chan/

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

Here's one I just found that has Ben Shapiro, The Daily wire and Washington Post. Ill read the Full article later. Finally some NON FAKE NEWS. Thanks Brother

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ne-booth-chan/

Shapiro has always been anti-Trump, but he doesn't peddle FAKE NEWS like the NYTs.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Shapiro has always been anti-Trump, but he doesn't peddle FAKE NEWS like the NYTs.

So if I read Shapiro and its anti Trump you will support it as a legitimate story?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

So if I read Shapiro and its anti Trump you will support it as a legitimate story?

What say you get back on the fucking topic which is about the NYT posting a FAKE NEWS article to slur a recently deceased president.