Quote:
Originally Posted by Budman
What does the year book prove assuming it is 100% authentic? I honestly don't see anything wrong with the inscription. Am I missing something? All I see is someone wishing a young girl merry christmas.
|
No, you're not missing anything.
It's my recollection though that the woman who has produced the yearbook had a divorce case dismissed and there was a rubber stamped signature on the order that had the "DA" on it, which was explained to indicate it wasn't Moore who signed it but a clerk in his court while he was a judge. During those years he was an "assistant district attorney" and he wouldn't have signed "DA" but "ADA" if he actually signed it.
So it's not just "handwriting" it's content that is questioned.
Irrespective of any "circumstantial" value to it. I guess all the folks claiming that means he had sexual contact with the female also had sexual contact with everyone whose "yearbook" they signed! I guess we should be careful about "Merry Christmas" cards and notes if we don't want a paternity suit slapped on our asses!!!
If Moore wins the Senate can conduct a hearing for a month or two to sort out all these accusations and AllWrong can produce the yearbook for a forensic document examiner to inspect and test (he'll be able to "date" the ink also) and she can produce her "report" and examiner to be cross-examined by some real lawyers. After they get placed under oath with the threat of a perjury conviction they may "soften" their recollections a bit.